본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

현업 국지모델기반 2018년 여름철 기상 1호 특별 고층관측자료의 관측 민감도 실험

Observing Sensitivity Experiment Based on Convective Scale Model for Upper-air Observation Data on GISANG 1 (KMA Research Vessel) in Summer 2018

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류대기과학

초록

KMA performed the special observation program to provide information about severe weather and to monitor typhoon PRAPIROON using the ship which called the Gisang 1 from 29 June 2018 to 4 July 2018 (UTC). For this period, upper-air was observed 21 times with 6 hour intervals using rawinsonde in the Gisang 1. We investigated the impact of upper-air observation data from the Gisang 1 on the performance of the operational convective scale model (we called LDAPS). We conducted two experiments that used all observation data including upper-air observation data from the Gisang 1 (OPER) and without it (EXPR). For a typhoon PRAPIROON case, track forecast error of OPER was lower than EXPR until forecast 24 hours. The intensity forecast error of OPER for minimum sea level pressure was lower than EXPR until forecast 12 hours. The intensity forecast error of OPER for maximum wind speed was mostly lower than EXPR until forecast 30 hours. OPER showed good performance for typhoon forecast compared with EXPR at the early lead time. Two precipitation cases occurred in the south of the Korean peninsula due to the impact of Changma on 1 July and typhoon on 3 July. The location of main precipitation band predicted from OPER was closer to observations. As assimilating upper-air data observed in the Gisang 1 to model, it showed positive results in typhoon and precipitation cases.

Abstract

KMA performed the special observation program to provide information about severe weather and to monitor typhoon PRAPIROON using the ship which called the Gisang 1 from 29 June 2018 to 4 July 2018 (UTC). For this period, upper-air was observed 21 times with 6 hour intervals using rawinsonde in the Gisang 1. We investigated the impact of upper-air observation data from the Gisang 1 on the performance of the operational convective scale model (we called LDAPS). We conducted two experiments that used all observation data including upper-air observation data from the Gisang 1 (OPER) and without it (EXPR). For a typhoon PRAPIROON case, track forecast error of OPER was lower than EXPR until forecast 24 hours. The intensity forecast error of OPER for minimum sea level pressure was lower than EXPR until forecast 12 hours. The intensity forecast error of OPER for maximum wind speed was mostly lower than EXPR until forecast 30 hours. OPER showed good performance for typhoon forecast compared with EXPR at the early lead time. Two precipitation cases occurred in the south of the Korean peninsula due to the impact of Changma on 1 July and typhoon on 3 July. The location of main precipitation band predicted from OPER was closer to observations. As assimilating upper-air data observed in the Gisang 1 to model, it showed positive results in typhoon and precipitation cases.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. Best, M. J., "The Joint UK Land Envi-ronment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 1: Energy and water fluxes", Geosci. Model Dev., 4, pp.677~699 (2011)[DOI]
  2. Braun, S. A., "Sensitivity of high-resolution simulations of hurricane Bob (1991) to planetary boundary layer parameterizations", Mon. Wea. Rev, 128, pp.3941~3961 (2000)
  3. Choi, H. -W., "A study on observing system experiment using special upper-air observations in summer 2014", Proc. of the Autumn Meeting of KMS, pp.122~123 (2014), Korean Meteorological Society
  4. Choi, H. -W., "A study on sensitivity experiment using upper-air observations in summer case in 2015", Proc. of the Autumn Meeting of KMS, pp.286~287 (2015), Korean Meteorological Society
  5. Edwards, J. M., "Studies with a flexible new radiation code. I: Choosing a configuration for a large-scale model", Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 122, pp.689~719 (1996)
  6. 하경자, "한반도 주변의 하계 강수량의 경년 변동과 이에 연관된 동아시아 순환의 특성", Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 39(5), pp.575~586 (2003), 한국기상학회
  7. 황윤정, "KLAPS와 3DVAR를 이용한 ProbeX-2009 남·서해상 고층관측자료의 관측 시스템 실험 연구", 대기, 21(2), pp.1~16 (2011), 한국기상학회
  8. Islam, T., "Tracking a tropical cyclone through WRF-ARW simulation and sensitivity of model physics", Nat. Hazards, 76, pp.1473~1495 (2015)[DOI]
  9. Jeon, E. -H., "The impact of T-PARC 2008 dropsonde observations on typhoon track forecasting of typhoon Silako (0813) and Rose (0815)", Proc. of the Autumn Meeting of KMS, pp.12~13 (2008), Korean Meteorological Society
  10. Yeon-Hee Kim, "The Impact of T-PARC 2008 Dropsonde Observations on Typhoon Track Forecasting", Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 46(3), pp.287~303 (2010), 한국기상학회
  11. Knaff, J. A., "Reexamination of tropical cyclone wind-pressure relationships", Wea. Forecasting, 22, pp.71~88 (2007)
  12. Lee, J. -S., "A study on sensitivity analysis of regional model using upper-air observations: precipitation cases on July 2013", Proc. of the Autumn Meeting of KMS, pp.438~439 (2013), Korean Meteorological Society
  13. Lee, Y. -H., "The improvement of prediction skill for precipitation based on the convective scale model in the summer 2016", Proc. of the Autumn Meeting of KMS, pp.297~298 (2016), Korean Meteorological Society
  14. Li, X., "Sensitivity of numerical simulation of early rapid intensification of hurricane Emily (2005)to cloud microphysical and planetary boundary layer parameterizations", Mon. Wea. Rev, 136, pp.4819~4838 (2008)
  15. Lock, A. P., "A new boundary layer mixing scheme. Part I: Scheme description and single-column model tests", Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, pp.3187~3199 (2000)
  16. Lorenc, A. C., "Why does 4D-Var beat 3D-Var?", Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, pp.3247~3257 (2005)
  17. Short, C. J., "How well can the met office unified model forecast tropical cyclones in the western north pacific?", Wea. Forecasting, 33, pp.185~200 (2018)[DOI]
  18. Smith, R. K., "Dependence of tropical-cyclone intensification on the boundary-layer representation in a numerical model", Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136, pp.1671~1685 (2010)[DOI]
  19. Staniforth, A., "Aspects of the dynamical core of a nonhydrostatic, deep-atmosphere, unified weather and climate-prediction model", J. Comput. Phys, 227, pp.3445~3464 (2008)
  20. Wei-Kuo Tao, "The Impact of Microphysical Schemes on Hurricane Intensity and Track", Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 47(1), pp.1~16 (2011), 한국기상학회
  21. Webster, S., "Improvements to the representation of orography in the Met Office Unified Model", Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 129, pp.1989~2010 (2003)
  22. Weston, P., "Assimilating IASI data into the UKV", Met Office SA Tech. Memo, 15, pp.30~ (2014)
  23. Wilson, D. R., "A microphysically based precipitation scheme for the UK Meteorological Office Unified Model", Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 125, pp.1607~1636 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)