A Comparative Study on the Operation Status and Users' Perceptions of URBAN GARDEN FIELDS
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study was conducted to present differences, problems, and improvement measures by investigat-ing and comparing the operation status of public and private vegetable gardens operated communal gardens by the initiating entity. Method: This study collected data from prior studies, literature, media, interview with public officials, garden managers, and users, and on-site survey and conducted variance analysis, frequency analysis, and cross analysis. Results: The study found that urban vegetable garden users are mostly men, married couples, and families, and people aged between 40s and 70s. People with higher educational background tended to use them more, and the occupation of the users included employees of commercial businesses, the self-employed, and housewives. In the public-private comparison of the management and operation, allowing and using vinyl mulching was found to be a problem. In the public-private comparison of environment and facilities, it was found that the envi-ronment was similar, but the facilities were different from each other in the private sector. In comparing users' perception, the public sector preferred the operation by local governments, while the private sector preferred the joint operation of the public and private sectors. The preferred area for sale was 17 to 33 square meters, and the inconvenient facilities were the toilets of the private sector. The activity satisfaction comparison showed that the effect of the use of urban gardens fields included being helpful for the production and sharing of safe agricultural products, health, and exercise, and helpful for mental health and providing exercise effects in terms of the health satisfaction. Conclusion: To sum up, urban agriculture is believed to spread the pluralistic value of agriculture, improve the urban environment, and help urban residents to utilize their leisure time and improve the quality of life.
Abstract
Purpose: This study was conducted to present differences, problems, and improvement measures by investigat-ing and comparing the operation status of public and private vegetable gardens operated communal gardens by the initiating entity. Method: This study collected data from prior studies, literature, media, interview with public officials, garden managers, and users, and on-site survey and conducted variance analysis, frequency analysis, and cross analysis. Results: The study found that urban vegetable garden users are mostly men, married couples, and families, and people aged between 40s and 70s. People with higher educational background tended to use them more, and the occupation of the users included employees of commercial businesses, the self-employed, and housewives. In the public-private comparison of the management and operation, allowing and using vinyl mulching was found to be a problem. In the public-private comparison of environment and facilities, it was found that the envi-ronment was similar, but the facilities were different from each other in the private sector. In comparing users' perception, the public sector preferred the operation by local governments, while the private sector preferred the joint operation of the public and private sectors. The preferred area for sale was 17 to 33 square meters, and the inconvenient facilities were the toilets of the private sector. The activity satisfaction comparison showed that the effect of the use of urban gardens fields included being helpful for the production and sharing of safe agricultural products, health, and exercise, and helpful for mental health and providing exercise effects in terms of the health satisfaction. Conclusion: To sum up, urban agriculture is believed to spread the pluralistic value of agriculture, improve the urban environment, and help urban residents to utilize their leisure time and improve the quality of life.
참고문헌 (20)
- Urban Planning Status Statistics Survey in 2017, "Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport", ~ (2018)
- Urban Agriculture Promotion Promotion Plan for Fiscal 2018, "Ministry of Agriculture Forestry and Livestock", ~ (2018)
- Lee JH, "A Study on the Influencing Factors of Community Revitalization in Urban Gardens", 석사, pp.2017
- Vision and Tasks of Urban Agriculture, "Kim TG", Korea Rural Economic Insti-tute, ~ (2010)
- Park TH, "Effects of Urban Farming Programon the Participants' Sense of Community", 석사, pp.2012
- Lee CH, "A Comparative Study on Urban Agriculture Operating Agents", 석사, pp.2012
- Noh HY, "A Study on the Influencing Factors of Urban Community Garden for the Activation of Community", 석사, pp.2012
- 이현주, "도시생태농업 실태와 활성화 방안 연구 : 수원시 시민농장 중심", 석사, 환경원예학과 환경원예전공, pp.2013
- Yoo SB, "A study on the Current Status and Characteristics of Urban Gardens from the Perspective of Urban Publicity", 석사, pp.2014
- 임미정, "지역 공동체 활성화를 위한 도시 텃밭의 이용자 인식 분석", 인간식물환경학회지, 14(4), pp.237~243 (2011), 인간식물환경학회
- 정성옥, "공동체의식과 교제활동이 도시텃밭 이용자 만족에 미치는 영향 - 전주지역을 사례로 -", 지역사회연구, 25(2), pp.211~231 (2017), 한국지역사회학회[DOI]
- 황지욱, "도시재생적 차원에서 텃밭의 도입과 제도화방안에 관한 연구 - 독일 클라인가르텐 사례와 비교를 중심으로 -", 한국지역개발학회지, 22(4), pp.169~184 (2010), 한국지역개발학회
- Kwon Gi-seok, "A Study on the Actual Condition and Improvement Plan of Hierachical SAFETY Management in Natural Parks", International Journal of Crisis & Safety, 5(1), pp.21~34 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- Sung Dong-suk, "Analysis of the Healing Effect of Walking Activities According to the Difference in FOREST ENVIRONMENT", Public Value, 5(1), pp.1~16 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- Kim MS, "A Study on the Plan to Revitalize Urban Agriculture in the Apartment Complex", 석사, pp.2014
- Kim LS, "Analysis of the Actual Condition of the Apartment Garden Reflecting the Design", 석사, pp.2015
- Analysis of Participant Needs by Garden Farm Type, "Hwang JI", The Korean Society of Community Living Science, ~ (2013)
- Research on Mid- to Long-term Development of Urban Agricul-ture, "Korea Rural Economic Institute", ~ (2015)
- 정준래, "도시농업형 소농기구 이용실태와 개발", 석사, 원예생명공학과 원예및원예치료학전공, pp.2013
- Jeon Mi-ja, "An Investigation on Developing the Shelter and Safety Facilities of FOREST KINDERGARTENS", Protection Convergence, 5(1), pp.42~53 (2020), J-INSTITUTE