본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재후보

A Brief Study on the Legitimacy of the National Security Act Examined through the Case of Cheongju SPY RING

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: In this study, the Cheongju Spy Ring incident offers a clear answer for the question of “Are there still spies?” in some parts of our society. It confirms the fact that North Korea is continuously carrying out espionage in South Korea regardless of the situation between the North and South Koreas. Hence, it is intended to discuss the legitimacy of the National Security Act, which is faced with the possibility of repealment, and the ripple effect of its repealment via an actual analysis of the Cheongju Spy Ring incident. Method: This study examines the legitimacy of the National Security Act and its ripple effects when it is re-pealed by analyzing the Cheongju Spy Ring incident. It will examine the differences of opinion on the controversy over the existence of the National Security Act to date. The content analytical method and the literature analytical method were implemented comprehensively and specifically for the contents of various aspects of the incident. Results: Concerning the enactment and repealment of the National Security Act, it is necessary to respond with a clear awareness from the perspective of national security and the maintenance and development of the liberal democratic system. The National Security Act has the purpose to guarantee the people's freedom and human rights by restricting anti-state activities which undermine the national security, not anti-unification-anti-democratic-anti-civil evil laws as North Korea claims. Furthermore, as evident in foreign cases, it can learned that the law is by no means a strong law. Conclusion: In conclusion, when the National Security Act is repealed, then first, from the security and military perspective, it would be impossible to punish the North Korean spies and the anti-state activists. Second, in terms of the political aspect, political instability will be aggravated by the conflicts between the ruling party pushing for the repealment of the National Security Act and the opposition party opposing thereto, which will further lead to the political instability and social disturbance. Third, in terms of the social aspect, the conflicts between the left and the right wings over the enactment and repealment of the National Security Act will intensify, and the division of public opinion and social unrest will further expand at best. Fourth, the political instability is expected given the increased conflicts among relevant departments within the government. Fifth, in terms of the inter-Korean rela-tions, the federal unification drive after the repealtment of the National Security Act by the North will be a prereq-uisite for improving the inter-Korean relations, thereby growing the pressure on South Korea. Ultimately, the re-pealment of the National Security Act will undermine the constitutional system of the Republic of Korea by threat-ening and destroying not only the security of the Republic of Korea but also the basic order of liberal democracy in the political, economic, and social areas.

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, the Cheongju Spy Ring incident offers a clear answer for the question of “Are there still spies?” in some parts of our society. It confirms the fact that North Korea is continuously carrying out espionage in South Korea regardless of the situation between the North and South Koreas. Hence, it is intended to discuss the legitimacy of the National Security Act, which is faced with the possibility of repealment, and the ripple effect of its repealment via an actual analysis of the Cheongju Spy Ring incident. Method: This study examines the legitimacy of the National Security Act and its ripple effects when it is re-pealed by analyzing the Cheongju Spy Ring incident. It will examine the differences of opinion on the controversy over the existence of the National Security Act to date. The content analytical method and the literature analytical method were implemented comprehensively and specifically for the contents of various aspects of the incident. Results: Concerning the enactment and repealment of the National Security Act, it is necessary to respond with a clear awareness from the perspective of national security and the maintenance and development of the liberal democratic system. The National Security Act has the purpose to guarantee the people's freedom and human rights by restricting anti-state activities which undermine the national security, not anti-unification-anti-democratic-anti-civil evil laws as North Korea claims. Furthermore, as evident in foreign cases, it can learned that the law is by no means a strong law. Conclusion: In conclusion, when the National Security Act is repealed, then first, from the security and military perspective, it would be impossible to punish the North Korean spies and the anti-state activists. Second, in terms of the political aspect, political instability will be aggravated by the conflicts between the ruling party pushing for the repealment of the National Security Act and the opposition party opposing thereto, which will further lead to the political instability and social disturbance. Third, in terms of the social aspect, the conflicts between the left and the right wings over the enactment and repealment of the National Security Act will intensify, and the division of public opinion and social unrest will further expand at best. Fourth, the political instability is expected given the increased conflicts among relevant departments within the government. Fifth, in terms of the inter-Korean rela-tions, the federal unification drive after the repealtment of the National Security Act by the North will be a prereq-uisite for improving the inter-Korean relations, thereby growing the pressure on South Korea. Ultimately, the re-pealment of the National Security Act will undermine the constitutional system of the Republic of Korea by threat-ening and destroying not only the security of the Republic of Korea but also the basic order of liberal democracy in the political, economic, and social areas.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. 김호정, "간첩죄 관련 형법 개정 방안", 외법논집, 40(1), pp.61~80 (2016), 법학연구소[DOI]
  2. 윤정원, "1차인민혁명당사건과 도예종의 활동", 대구사학, 133, pp.315~357 (2018), 대구사학회[DOI]
  3. 허병식, "분단 디아스포라와 재일조선인 간첩의 표상", 동악어문학, (73), pp.119~142 (2017), 동악어문학회[DOI]
  4. 최재덕, "코로나 팬데믹 시대, 국제질서의 변화와러시아의 외교전략: 중러․미러 관계를 중심으로", 중소연구, 44(3), pp.49~85 (2020), 아태지역연구센터[DOI]
  5. Yoon Hae-sung, "Strengthening the Capacity of LAW Enforcement Agency in Line with the New Security Situation", Robotics & AI Ethics, 1(1), pp.1~6 (2016), J-INSTITUTE
  6. Lee Hyun-jung, "Review on National Security Oriented JUDICIAL System of Republic of KOREA", Robotics & AI Ethics, 1(1), pp.18~24 (2016), J-INSTITUTE
  7. 양승돈, "Review of Trend Analysis of TERRORISM and KOREA's Implications", International Journal of Terrorism & National Security, 5(1), pp.40~47 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
  8. Kim Tae-min, "Characteristics of Legal System Related to SECURITY in Republic of KOREA", Protection Convergence, 2(1), pp.25~32 (2017), J-INSTITUTE
  9. 조성구, "The Policies of South KOREA's Counter Intelligence Agency on North Korea's ESPIONAGE Activities in South Korea", Protection Convergence, 3(2), pp.30~35 (2018), J-INSTITUTE
  10. 허일태, "국가보안법 폐지의 당위성", 형사정책, 16(1), pp.237~274 (2004), 한국형사정책학회
  11. 김영기, "국가보안법 존폐에 대한 국민의 태도에 영향을 미치는 요인", 예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어 논문지, 8(11), pp.513~522 (2018), 사단법인 인문사회과학기술융합학회[DOI]
  12. 박웅신, "A Study on the Improvement System of National COUNTER-INTELLIGENCE Activities", International Journal of Military Affairs, 6(1), pp.45~58 (2021), J-INSTITUTE
  13. 박상식, "국가보안법 제7조의 남용사례와 위헌성에 관한 연구", 법학연구, 21(4), pp.1~30 (2013), 법학연구소
  14. Lee KS, "Stop the Conspiracy to Open and Close the National Security Act: The Focus of the Strategy for Redemption against South Korea is the Abolition of the Security Law and the Withdrawal of U.S. Forces", Monthly Korea Forum, 116(1), pp.94~101 (1999)
  15. 손동권, "사상범에 대한 형사실체법의 정비방안", 비교형사법연구, 8(1(2)), pp.245~266 (2006), 한국비교형사법학회
  16. 이호중, "국가보안법 사건에서 전문법칙의 적용 문제– 왕재산사건 제1심 판결에 나타난 전문법칙의 적용범위에 대한 비평", 민주법학, (49), pp.41~70 (2012), 민주주의법학연구회[DOI]
  17. 채성준, "국가보안법 존치 당위성에 관한 고찰", 법학논총, 41(3), pp.91~123 (2017), 법학연구소[DOI]
  18. 채성준, "역사적 제도주의 관점에서의 국가보안법 경로변화 연구", 한국동북아논총, 22(2), pp.239~261 (2017), 한국동북아학회
  19. 조성구, "Terrorism CRISIS on Northeast Asia", International Journal of Crisis & Safety, 5(1), pp.35~42 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
  20. 제성호, "국가보안법상 ‘반국가단체’의 개념과 범위 - 대법원 판례를 중심으로 -", 법조, 59(8), pp.5~52 (2010), 법조협회[DOI]
  21. 정경수, "반국가보안법운동 국제화의 성과와 과제", 민주법학, (33), pp.199~228 (2007), 민주주의법학연구회[DOI]
  22. 오동석, "국가보안법의 현재 상황과 폐지의 당위성", 민주법학, 0(26), pp.105~130 (2004), 민주주의법학연구회
  23. 김태수, "3.1 운동에 대한 보안법 적용이 타당성", 비교형사법연구, 21(1), pp.235~256 (2019), 한국비교형사법학회[DOI]
  24. 김현정, "대한제국의 정치적 결사 관련 법령 변천의 헌법사적 의미", 법학연구, 25(3), pp.41~63 (2017), 법학연구소

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)