Chechnya Separation Movement and Russia's Response: Focusing on Chechnya War and TERRORISM
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to consider the separation struggle of the Chechen Republic in the Cauca-sus region, which has been under Russian control for more than 200 years, and Russia's response. Chechen wants to get away from the Russian Federation and have their own government. But the Russian federal government does not want to undermine its security interests or economic interests. In this study, we look at the ideologies and strategies pursued by the two forces. Method: In this paper, we explore the political and economic background of the North Caucasus region and the ethnic characteristics of Chechnya, and explore the existing research literature on the two Chechnya wars. Specifi-cally, it considers mountainous peoples, Islamic acceptance, relations with neighboring countries, geologic factors of Chechnya, and the Russian federal government's pressure on the Chechnya Republic. Results: Chechnya has been fighting for independence ever since it came under Russian control. In response, Russia has been consistent with strong military pressure and ethnic oppression rather than a moderate assimila-tion policy. This is because many ethnic groups in Russia were concerned about the departure. The North Cauca-sus region is also located on the border with NATO and Central Asia, which could have a significant impact on Russia's security and economy, so Russia is not giving up the region. Conclusion: Chechnya is linked to direct or indirect interests in Russia and other Western countries, including the Republics of the North Caucasus, Turkey and Central Asian countries, and the United States. Also, the conflict may vary depending on Russia's strategy for Chechnya. Local fighting and terrorism are not expected to end un-less Chechnya's independence is achieved.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to consider the separation struggle of the Chechen Republic in the Cauca-sus region, which has been under Russian control for more than 200 years, and Russia's response. Chechen wants to get away from the Russian Federation and have their own government. But the Russian federal government does not want to undermine its security interests or economic interests. In this study, we look at the ideologies and strategies pursued by the two forces. Method: In this paper, we explore the political and economic background of the North Caucasus region and the ethnic characteristics of Chechnya, and explore the existing research literature on the two Chechnya wars. Specifi-cally, it considers mountainous peoples, Islamic acceptance, relations with neighboring countries, geologic factors of Chechnya, and the Russian federal government's pressure on the Chechnya Republic. Results: Chechnya has been fighting for independence ever since it came under Russian control. In response, Russia has been consistent with strong military pressure and ethnic oppression rather than a moderate assimila-tion policy. This is because many ethnic groups in Russia were concerned about the departure. The North Cauca-sus region is also located on the border with NATO and Central Asia, which could have a significant impact on Russia's security and economy, so Russia is not giving up the region. Conclusion: Chechnya is linked to direct or indirect interests in Russia and other Western countries, including the Republics of the North Caucasus, Turkey and Central Asian countries, and the United States. Also, the conflict may vary depending on Russia's strategy for Chechnya. Local fighting and terrorism are not expected to end un-less Chechnya's independence is achieved.
참고문헌 (23)
- 조성택, "Kosovo War and Retaliatory TERRORISM: Exclusive Nationalism of Albania and Serbia", International Journal of Military Affairs, 6(2), pp.31~38 (2021), J-INSTITUTE
- 조성택, "The Dissolution of the Soviet Union, the Emergence of the CIS System, and Ethnic Disputes", International Journal of Military Affairs, 6(1), pp.35~44 (2021), J-INSTITUTE
- Ko ST, "The Russian Federalism and the War in Chechnya", The Korean Journal of International Studies, 37(2), pp.79~97 (1998)
- 기연수, "러시아의 新국가전략과 北카프카즈 지역의 지정학적 의의", 슬라브硏究, 22(1), pp.51~72 (2006), 러시아연구소
- 김상원, "러시아의 국가전략으로서 북카프카즈 에너지 경제학", 슬라브硏究, 22(1), pp.73~92 (2006), 러시아연구소
- 정세진, "체첸 전쟁의 기원: 러시아와 체첸의 역사적 갈등관계를 중심으로", 슬라브학보, 20(2), pp.355~386 (2005), 한국슬라브․유라시아학회
- Shin BS, "Culture and Nationalism: Comparison of Two Republics of Tatarstan and Chechnya", Journal of World Politics, 28(1), pp.253~280 (2007)
- 고상두, "체제전환 이후 러시아의 국가 지배력:수준과 변화요인", 중소연구, 35(4), pp.151~172 (2012), 아태지역연구센터[DOI]
- 박정호, "자카프카지예 지역분쟁의 정치?경제적 요인 분석 -그루지야와 아브하지야 분쟁을 중심으로", 슬라브학보, 21(2), pp.301~323 (2006), 한국슬라브․유라시아학회
- Park JS, "Regional Issues of Caucasus and Caspian Sea and Responses of U.S. and Russia", Peace Studies, 12(2), pp.153~180 (2004)
- 황성우, "北카프카즈 지역갈등의 사회문화적 요인- 체첸 공화국을 중심으로 -", 슬라브硏究, 22(1), pp.143~174 (2006), 러시아연구소
- Chang BO, "The Conflict History of Checnya-Russia", Journal of International Regional Studies, 13(1), pp.513~530 (2009)
- Yun YM, "The Patterns of Russian-Chechen Conflict in the Post-Cold War", Peace Studies, 13(1), pp.121~152 (2005)
- 손영훈, "체첸-러시아 전쟁의 전개 과정과 국가테러", 한국중동학회논총, 31(3), pp.31~58 (2011), 한국중동학회[DOI]
- 홍완석, "험난하 여정, 러시아의 체첸분쟁: 원인과 경과, 그리고 전망", 한국정치학회보, 39(3), pp.237~262 (2005), 한국정치학회
- Yun Woo-suk, "Periodical and Spatial Differences of Terrorism Examining Global TERRORISM Database from 1970~2018", International Journal of Terrorism & National Security, 5(1), pp.1~12 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- 서춘식, "러시아의 제2차 체첸침공과 민군관계", 슬라브硏究, 19(1), pp.114~150 (2003), 러시아연구소
- 현승수, "체첸 전쟁과 국제 이슬람 무자히딘 운동 -아랍인 야전사령관 카탑의 사례를 중심으로-", 한국이슬람학회논총, 17(2), pp.107~134 (2007), 한국이슬람학회
- 현승수, "북카프카스 '와합주의 문제'의 기원", 슬라브硏究, 20(1), pp.165~184 (2004), 러시아연구소
- 정세진, "러시아 북카프카스 지역의 독립운동과 지하드 이념 : 체첸 전쟁에 대한 해석학", 슬라브학보, 29(2), pp.241~276 (2014), 한국슬라브․유라시아학회
- 김태연, "체첸화 - 필요와 탐욕의 공동 프로젝트", 평화연구, 20(2), pp.323~364 (2012), 평화와 민주주의연구소
- Lee Man-jong, "Recommendations for the Development of COUNTERTERRORISM Policy in KOREA: Evaluation on Anti-Terrorism Act", International Journal of Military Affairs, 1(2), pp.1~7 (2016), J-INSTITUTE
- 박웅신, "A Study on the Improvement of TERRORISM Response in Subway Crisis and Public Transportation", International Journal of Terrorism & National Security, 5(1), pp.48~59 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
