본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Examining the Policy Decision-Making Process of Youth Policy Governance in Gyeonggi Province, South Korea

조유정
성균관대학교 국정전문대학원 (graduate school of governance)|2024.12|국정관리연구 (Journal of Governance Studies)|제19권 제4호|pp. 1-43|DOI 10.16973/jgs.2024.19.4.001

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Grounded TheoryYouth Policy근거 이론참여적 거버넌스청년정책Participatory BudgetingPolicy Decision-Making Process참여예산Participatory Governance정책 의사결정 과정

초록

Youth policy governance and participation have gained attention through the rising importance of youth issues in relation to economic and social situation and formation of youth agenda in global society. The aim of this study is to explore and evaluate factors that impact the policy decision-making process of youth policy governance in Gyeonggi province, South Korea, and answer the research question, ‘How is participatory governance impacting the development of youth policy decision-making process in Gyeonggi province, South Korea?’. This study advances the understanding of youth policy governance in South Korea by researching the case of Gyeonggi Province Youth Policy Participation Committee that provides insightful findings and analysis on youth policy governance. Thematic analysis of qualitative research has been conducted by analyzing the sub-committee meeting minutes of Gyeonggi Province Youth Policy Participation Committee in second term. Results indicate that youth policy decision-making process and policy proposal are progressed in more constructive, developmental, and interactive ways by promoting Youth Policy Participation Committee in Gyeonggi province, South Korea than Youth Policy Participation Committee before with specific findings in policy process and policy proposal development, system and institution reform and improvement, and activation of youth participation and communication. The implications for improvement on the committee system and activity, and enhancement of youth policy governance have been discussed, and contribution to the gap in the literature has been made with suggestions for further research on the case and literature.

Abstract

Youth policy governance and participation have gained attention through the rising importance of youth issues in relation to economic and social situation and formation of youth agenda in global society. The aim of this study is to explore and evaluate factors that impact the policy decision-making process of youth policy governance in Gyeonggi province, South Korea, and answer the research question, ‘How is participatory governance impacting the development of youth policy decision-making process in Gyeonggi province, South Korea?’. This study advances the understanding of youth policy governance in South Korea by researching the case of Gyeonggi Province Youth Policy Participation Committee that provides insightful findings and analysis on youth policy governance. Thematic analysis of qualitative research has been conducted by analyzing the sub-committee meeting minutes of Gyeonggi Province Youth Policy Participation Committee in second term. Results indicate that youth policy decision-making process and policy proposal are progressed in more constructive, developmental, and interactive ways by promoting Youth Policy Participation Committee in Gyeonggi province, South Korea than Youth Policy Participation Committee before with specific findings in policy process and policy proposal development, system and institution reform and improvement, and activation of youth participation and communication. The implications for improvement on the committee system and activity, and enhancement of youth policy governance have been discussed, and contribution to the gap in the literature has been made with suggestions for further research on the case and literature.

참고문헌 (61)

  1. Araral, E., "Routledge handbook of public policy" (2013), Routledge
  2. Bernard, H. R., "Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology" (1998), AltaMira Press
  3. Bernard, H. R., "Analyzing qualitative data : systematic approaches" (2010), SAGE
  4. Birkland, T. A., "An Introduction to the Policy Process : Theories, Concepts and Models of Public Policy Making" (2010), Taylor & Francis Group
  5. Bowen, G. A., "Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method", Qualitative research journal, 9(2), pp.27~40 (2009)[DOI]
  6. Braun, V., "Using thematic analysis in psychology", Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp.77~101 (2006)[DOI]
  7. Cairney, P, "The Oxford Handbook of Classics in Public Policy and Administration" (2015), Oxford University Press
  8. Ebdon, C., "Beyond the public hearing: Citizen participation in the local government budget process", Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting &Financial Management, 14(2), pp.273~294 (2002)
  9. "COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS: Engaging, Connecting and Empowering young people: a new EU Youth Strategy" (2018)[URL]
  10. European Union, "Resolution of the Council of the European Union and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States meeting within the Council on a framework for European cooperation in the youth field: The European Union Youth Strategy 2019-2027", Official Journal of the European Union, 61(C 456) (2019)
  11. "Overview - Youth - Eurostat"[URL]
  12. Fischer, F., "Handbook of public policy analysis :theory, politics, and methods", pp.2007, CRC
  13. "Doing Grounded Theory" (2018)[URL]
  14. Glaser, B. G., "The discovery of grounded theory :strategies for qualitative research" (1967), Aldine de Gruyter
  15. Glaser, B. G., "The discovery of grounded theory : strategies for qualitative research" (1968), Weidenfeld and Nicolson
  16. Goncalves, S., "The Effects of Participatory Budgeting on Municipal Expenditures and Infant Mortality in Brazil", World development, 53, pp.94~110 (2014)[DOI]
  17. Goulding, C., "Grounded Theory" (2002)
  18. Guest, G., "Applied Thematic Analysis" (2012)
  19. (2022)[URL]
  20. (2023)[URL]
  21. [URL]
  22. Haas, P. M., "Introduction : epistemic communities and international policy coordination", International organization, 46(1), pp.1~35 (1992)[DOI]
  23. Hong, S., "Citizen participation and the redistribution of public goods", Public administration(London), 96(3), pp.481~496 (2018)[DOI]
  24. Howlett, M., "Governance Modes, Policy Regimes and Operational Plans : A Multi-Level Nested Model of Policy Instrument Choice and Policy Design", Policy sciences, 42(1), pp.73~89 (2009)[DOI]
  25. John, P., "Analyzing public policy" (2012), Routledge
  26. Jung, S. -M., "Participatory budgeting and government efficiency : evidence from municipal governments in South Korea", International Review of Administrative Sciences, 88(4), pp.1105~1123 (2022)[DOI]
  27. "Korean Public Administration Review", 2019, 31~63
  28. Participatory Governance and Policy Diffusion in Local Governments in Korea: Implementation of Participatory Budgeting (2016-01), "Kim, S", KDI, ~ (2016)
  29. Kingdon, J. W., "Agendas, alternatives, and public policies" (2014), Pearson Education Limited
  30. Kuckartz, U., "Qualitative Text Analysis: A Guide to Methods", Practice &Using Software (2014)[DOI]
  31. Lee, D., "Participatory budgeting and the pattern of local government spending : Evidence from South Korea", European Journal of Political Economy, 76, pp.102235~ (2023)[DOI]
  32. "Culture and Politics", 2020, 91~121
  33. Lindblom, C. E., "The Science of "Muddling Through"", Public administration review, 19(2), pp.79~88 (1959)[DOI]
  34. [URL]
  35. "Korean Law Information Center"[URL]
  36. "THE OECD ACTION PLAN FOR YOUTH - GIVING YOUTH A BETTER START IN THE LABOUR MARKET" (2013)[URL]
  37. "Society at a Glance 2016" (2016)[URL]
  38. "Investing in Youth: Korea" (2019)[URL]
  39. "The Updated OECD Youth Action Plan: Building Blocks for Future Action" (2021)[URL]
  40. "Oh, J.", Gyeonggi Research Institute, 1~179, pp.Gyeonggi Research Institute Policy Research, 2020-14 (2020)
  41. "Journal of Contemporary Politics", 2020, 77~116
  42. "Critical Sociological Association of Korea Conference Paper", 2022, 128~141
  43. Pawson, R., "Evidence-based Policy" (2006), SAGE Publications Ltd
  44. Roberts, N., "Public Deliberation in an Age of Direct Citizen Participation", American review of public administration, 34(4), pp.315~353 (2004)[DOI]
  45. Sabatier, P. A., "Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research : a Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis", Journal of public policy, 6(1), pp.21~48 (1986)[DOI]
  46. Sabatier, P. A., "An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein", Policy sciences, 21(2, pp.3) (1988), 129~168
  47. Sabatier, P. A., "Theories of the policy process" (2014), Westview Press
  48. Shah, A, "Participatory Budgeting" (2007), World Bank Publications
  49. Sintomer, Y., "Transnational Models of Citizen Participation : The Case of Participatory Budgeting", Sociologias, 14(30), pp.70~116 (2012)
  50. Sintomer, Y., "Participatory Budgeting in Asia and Europe: Key Challenges of Participation" (2013), Palgrave Macmillan UK
  51. "Resolutions adopted on the reports of the Third Committee" (1979)[URL]
  52. "Resolutions adopted on the reports of the Third Committee" (1985)[URL]
  53. "RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY on the report of the Third Committee (A/54/595)" (2000)[URL]
  54. "Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 18 December 2009 on the report of the Third Committee (A/64/432)" (2010)[URL]
  55. "United Nations Youth Strategy: Youth 2030" (2018)[URL]
  56. "Grounded Theory for Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide" (2013)[URL]
  57. Urquhart, C., "Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems", Information systems journal (Oxford, England), 20(4), pp.357~381 (2010)[DOI]
  58. Wampler, B., "Participatory budgeting: Core principles and key impacts", Journal of Public Deliberation (2012)
  59. Wampler, B., "Participatory Budgeting : Diffusion and Outcomes across the World", Journal of public deliberation, 8(2) (2012)
  60. "The Journal of Incheon Studies", 2014, 223~250
  61. (2022)[URL]

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

ESG 복합지수와 영역별 ESG 지수 변화에 관한 실증연구: 17개 광역자치단체를 대상으로이세규pp. 45-66정부의 거버넌스 역량이 지능형 정부 구현에 미치는 영향: 디지털 플랫폼 서비스 질의 조절효과를 중심으로이가빈, 하선우, 강나율, 박성민pp. 67-101제주특별자치도 공무원의 인사관리 인식이 직무만족과 조직헌신에 미치는 영향박성배, 김주경pp. 103-126국가연구개발사업 관리자의 성과정보 활용에 영향을 미치는 요인유나리pp. 127-154공익데이터 개념 모형 연구: 생산자와 사용자를 중심으로김도승, 조병우, 이삼열pp. 155-178
원문 보기