본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Mechanical properties of silicon carbide/graphene nanoplatelets composites prepared by spark plasma sintering

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류재료공학

초록

Silicon carbide (SiC)/graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) ceramic composites with additions of 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 wt.% GNPs werefabricated by spark plasma sintering (SPS). Effects of GNPs addition on densification, microstructure and mechanicalproperties (vickers hardness and fracture toughness) of the SiC/GNPs composites were investigated. As GNPs contentincreased, relative density of the composites decreased slightly from 99.0% for monolithic SiC to 98.3% at 8 wt.% GPNs. Uniform distribution of GNPs in the microstructure was exhibited. Vickers hardness was increased by 7% (25.4 GPa) inthe 1 wt.% GNPs composition relative to monolithic SiC (23.5 GPa). The Vickers hardness and fracture toughness changesindicated different states of GNPs existence in the SiC/GNPs composites, among which thin-layered GNPs wrapping SiCgrains could benefit Vickers hardness relative to agglomeration of GNPs.

Abstract

Silicon carbide (SiC)/graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) ceramic composites with additions of 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 wt.% GNPs werefabricated by spark plasma sintering (SPS). Effects of GNPs addition on densification, microstructure and mechanicalproperties (vickers hardness and fracture toughness) of the SiC/GNPs composites were investigated. As GNPs contentincreased, relative density of the composites decreased slightly from 99.0% for monolithic SiC to 98.3% at 8 wt.% GPNs. Uniform distribution of GNPs in the microstructure was exhibited. Vickers hardness was increased by 7% (25.4 GPa) inthe 1 wt.% GNPs composition relative to monolithic SiC (23.5 GPa). The Vickers hardness and fracture toughness changesindicated different states of GNPs existence in the SiC/GNPs composites, among which thin-layered GNPs wrapping SiCgrains could benefit Vickers hardness relative to agglomeration of GNPs.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. S. Li, , J. Alloys. Compd, 834, pp.155252~ (2020)
  2. D. Sciti, , J. Mater. Sci, 35(15), pp.3849~3855 (2000)
  3. Y. Cao, , J. Ceram. Process. Res, 24(2), pp.321~328 (2023)
  4. C. G. Lee, , Sci, 321(5887), pp.385~388 (2008)
  5. A. Nieto, , Int. Mater. Rev, 62(5), pp.241~302 (2016)
  6. I. -J. Shon, , Ceram. Process. Res, 17(11), pp.1171~1174 (2016)
  7. C. Chen, , Ceram. Int, 46(14), pp.23173~23179 (2020)
  8. M. Nader, , J. Mater. Sci, 34(6), pp.1197~1204 (1999)
  9. T. Maruyama, , J. Cryst. Growth, 468, pp.175~178 (2017)
  10. A. N. Manuel Belmonte, , Scripta. Mater, 113, pp.127~130 (2016)
  11. P. Miranzo, , J. Eur. Ceram. Soc, 33(10), pp.1665~1674 (2013)
  12. Q. S. Li, , J. Mater. Sci. Technol, 32(7), pp.633~638 (2016)
  13. E. Bódis, , Ceram. Int, 43(12), pp.9005~9011 (2017)
  14. J. M. Anna Kaźmierczak-Bałata, , Ceram. Int, 44(9), pp.10273~10280 (2018)
  15. X. Z. Guo, , Adv. Appl. Ceram, 118(7), pp.409~417 (2019)
  16. R. Sedlák, , J. Eur. Ceram. Soc, 37(14), pp.4307~4314 (2017)
  17. N. Lu, , Solid. State. Phenom, 281, pp.125~130 (2018)
  18. A. Eckmann, , Nano. Lett, 12(8), pp.3925~3930 (2012)
  19. J. Z Zhun, , Petrochemical. Technology, 51(11), pp.1323~1329 (2022)
  20. B. Zhang, , J. Funct. Mater, 50(08), pp.8133~8139 (2019)
  21. V. -H. Nguyen, , Ceram. Int, 47(9), pp.12459~12466 (2021)
  22. C. López-Pernía, , J. Eur. Ceram. Soc, 39(14), pp.4435~4439 (2019)
  23. L. X. Liu, , J. Am. Ceram. Soc, 99(1), pp.257~264 (2016)
  24. M. Balog, , J. Eur. Ceram. Soc, 27(5), pp.2145~2152 (2007)
  25. C. Yun, , Ceram. Int, 41(7), pp.8643~8649 (2015)
  26. Y. H. Huang, , J. Eur. Ceram. Soc, 38(13), pp.4329~4337 (2018)
  27. Z. Y. B. Zeng, , J. Am. Ceram. Soc, 101(8), pp.3498~3507 (2018)
  28. J. H. Gong, , J. Adv. Ceram, 42, pp.287~428 (2021)
  29. A. Nieto, , Mat. Sci. Eng. A-Struct, 582, pp.338~346 (2013)
  30. B. Lanfant, , J. Eur. Ceram. Soc, 35(13), pp.3369~3379 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (25건)