Power-to-gas systems with a focus on biological methanation
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Power to Gas (P2G) systems aim to store surplus renewable electricity generated in the form of gaseous fuels such as hydrogenor methane. The concept is ideal for storing the surplus energy for long periods in gaseous form and can be used in the futurefor desired end applications, i.e. either in gaseous form or electricity. In the P2G process, the surplus renewable energyconverts into methane (gaseous form) in a two-step process: electrolysis followed by methanation. The electrolysis process isused as the source for hydrogen generation, which further reduces carbon dioxide to produce methane. In this review, differentelectrolyzers and methanation processes are compared for the P2G process. The major process parameters and hydrogen gasliquid mass transfer are discussed by comparing different process conditions and reactor configurations used in biologicalmethanation. An understanding of the techno-economic analysis indicates that cost of the hydrogen generation is the key factorthat determines the overall economics of the P2G system. The cost of hydrogen generation is associated with the capital costof the electrolyzer and the cost of the electricity. It is expected that once this technology becomes mature, the economics of P2Gsystems will improve in the future.
Abstract
Power to Gas (P2G) systems aim to store surplus renewable electricity generated in the form of gaseous fuels such as hydrogenor methane. The concept is ideal for storing the surplus energy for long periods in gaseous form and can be used in the futurefor desired end applications, i.e. either in gaseous form or electricity. In the P2G process, the surplus renewable energyconverts into methane (gaseous form) in a two-step process: electrolysis followed by methanation. The electrolysis process isused as the source for hydrogen generation, which further reduces carbon dioxide to produce methane. In this review, differentelectrolyzers and methanation processes are compared for the P2G process. The major process parameters and hydrogen gasliquid mass transfer are discussed by comparing different process conditions and reactor configurations used in biologicalmethanation. An understanding of the techno-economic analysis indicates that cost of the hydrogen generation is the key factorthat determines the overall economics of the P2G system. The cost of hydrogen generation is associated with the capital costof the electrolyzer and the cost of the electricity. It is expected that once this technology becomes mature, the economics of P2Gsystems will improve in the future.
참고문헌 (71)
- IEA, "Renewables 2021: Analysis and forecasts to 2026", International Energy Agency, 14~15 (2021)
- M. Götz, , Renew. Energy, 85, pp.1371~1390 (2016)
- A. Sternberg, , Energy Environ. Sci, 8(2), pp.389~400 (2015)
- A. Mazza, , Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev, 92, pp.794~806 (2018)
- G. Gahleitner, , Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 38(5), pp.2039~2061 (2013)
- S. Niaz, , Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev, 50, pp.457~469 (2015)
- M. Ball, , Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 40(25), pp.7903~7919 (2015)
- Shian Li, "Systematic experimental study for optimized hydrogen production of Ni", CeO2 prepared by incipient wetness impregnation technique, 2020, pp.21(2), 263~268[DOI]
- Pramod H. Borse, "Comparision of Zn₂TiO₄and rutile TiO₂photocatalysts for H₂production under UV and near-visible light irradiation", Journal of Ceramic Processing Research, 13(1), pp.42~46 (2012), 청정에너지연구소[DOI]
- F. Zhang, , Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 41(33), pp.14535~14552 (2016)
- P. D. Lund, , Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev, 45, pp.785~807 (2015)
- P. K. Thauer, , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A, 109(38), pp.15084~15085 (2012)
- K. Ghaib, , Renew. Sus. Energ. Rev, 81, pp.433~446 (2018)
- F. D. Meylan, , J. Energy Storage, 11, pp.16~24 (2017)
- A. Al-sharafi, , Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev, 69, pp.33~49 (2017)
- R. O’shea, , Renew. Energy, 114, pp.1090~1100 (2017)
- L. Deng, , Int. J. Greenh Gas Control, 4(4), pp.638~646 (2010)
- Ji Sun Lee, "Application of bioelectromethanation using an electroactive methanogen for the biogas upgrading", Journal of Ceramic Processing Research, 21(5), pp.602~608 (2020), 청정에너지연구소[DOI]
- Yootaek Kim, "Reduction of carbon dioxide using ceramic carriers with photosynthetic bacteria in anaerobic and in ambient conditions", Journal of Ceramic Processing Research, 18(4), pp.285~290 (2017), 청정에너지연구소[DOI]
- J. Vanderwalle, , Energy Convers. Manag, 94, pp.28~39 (2015)
- A. Brisse, , Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 33(20), pp.5375~5382 (2008)
- M. Lehner, "Power-to-Gas: Technology and Business Models", pp.7~17 (2014), Springer Briefs in Energy
- V. R. Jothi, , Adv. Energy Mater, 10, pp.1904020~ (2020)
- Nguyen Thi Minh Nguyet, "Facile synthesis of MoS2 nanosheets-carbon nanofibers composite as catalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction", Journal of Ceramic Processing Research, 20(2), pp.148~151 (2019), 청정에너지연구소[DOI]
- S. Anantharaj, , Angew. Chem. Int. Ed, 60, pp.18981~19006 (2021)
- R. J. Gilliam, , Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 32(3), pp.359~364 (2007)
- A. Abraham, , Cellulose, 27, pp.8135~8146 (2020)
- V. R. Jothi, , Adv. Energy Mater, 8, pp.1802615~ (2018)
- L. Bertuccioli, "Study on development of water electrolysis in the EU, Final report", pp.1~160 (2014), E4tech element Energy
- O. Ulleberg, , Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 35(5), pp.1841~1852 (2010)
- W. T. Grubb, , J. Phys. Chem, 63, pp.55~67 (1959)
- A. Hassan, , Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 44(19), pp.9577~9593 (2019)
- R. Bhandari, , J. Clean. Prod, 85, pp.151~163 (2014)
- F. Barbir, , Sol. Energy, 78(5), pp.661~669 (2005)
- J. Turner, , Int. J. Energy Res, 32(5), pp.379~407 (2008)
- M. J. S. Zuberi, , Appl. Energy, 228, pp.390~408 (2018)
- M. A. Laguna-Bercero, , J. Power Sources, 203, pp.4~16 (2012)
- A. Ursua, , Proc. IEEE, 100(2), pp.410~426 (2012)
- C. J. Quarton, , Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev, 98, pp.302~316 (2018)
- D. Garcia, , Energies, 9(11), pp.963~ (2016)
- "website : H2V PRODUCT-Green Gas for Everyone"[URL]
- P. E. Dodds, , Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 40(5), pp.2065~2083 (2015)
- D. Parra, , Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev, 101, pp.279~294 (2019)
- M. Balat, , Prog. Energy Combust. Sci, 34(5), pp.551~573 (2008)
- R. Munoz, , Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol, 14, pp.727~759 (2015)
- J. Ling, , Chin. J. Chem. Eng, 24(4), pp.460~467 (2016)
- B. Metz, "Carbon dioxide capture and storage, IPCC Special Report", pp.1~ (2005), Cambridge University Press
- B. Demirel, , Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol, 7, pp.173~190 (2008)
- O. Choi, , Energies, 12, pp.4130~ (2019)
- B. K. Ahring, , Water Res, 35(10), pp.2446~2452 (2001)
- I. Angelidaki, , Biotechnol. Adv, 36(2), pp.452~466 (2018)
- G. Luo, , Biotechnol. Bioeng, 109(11), pp.2729~2736 (2012)
- I. Bassani, , Environ. Sci. Technol, 49(20), pp.12585~12593 (2015)
- P. G. Kougias, , Bioresour. Technol, 225, pp.429~437 (2017)
- I. Diaz, , Bioresour. Technol, 185, pp.246~253 (2015)
- N. Alfaro, , Bioresour. Technol, 258, pp.142~150 (2018)
- W. Wang, , Bioresour. Technol, 146, pp.234~239 (2013)
- L. Rachbauer, , Appl. Energy, 180, pp.483~490 (2016)
- T. Ullrich, , Bioresour. Technol, 247, pp.7~13 (2018)
- S. R. Guiot, , Environ. Sci. Technol, 45(5), pp.2006~2012 (2011)
- I. Bassani, , Bioresour. Technol, 221, pp.485~491 (2016)
- I. Bassani, , Bioresour. Technol, 234, pp.310~319 (2017)
- Y. Liu, , RSC Adv, 8, pp.26488~26496 (2018)
- G. Luo, , Biotechnol. Bioeng, 109(1), pp.2729~2736 (2012)
- D. J. Batstone, , Water Sci. Tech, 45(10), pp.65~73 (2002)
- M.R. Martin, , Archaea, pp.157529~ (2013)
- Y. Chen, , Appl. Energy, 116, pp.409~415 (2014)
- D. Parra, , Int. J. Hydrog. Energ, 41(18), pp.3748~3761 (2016)
- P. Collet, , Appl. Energy, 192, pp.282~295 (2017)
- A. Ajanovic, , Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Energy Environ, 8(1), pp.e318~ (2019)
- IRENA, "Hydrogen from Renewable Power:Technology outlook for the energy transition", pp.1~ (2018), International Renewable Energy Agency
