상법 제23조의 상호권과 역혼동 인정요건에 관한 소고
A legal analysis on the right of trade names of Article 23 in the Commercial Law and requirement for reverse confusion
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
No person shall, for unfair purpose, use any trade name which is likely to induce others to believe that it represents the business of another person. In a case where a person has used such a misrepresenting trade name in contravention of above, any person whose interest is likely to be thereby harmed or any person who has registered his trade name may demand cessation of its use. In addition, he has a right of claim for damages. No trade name which has been registered by another person shall be registered as trade name of the same kind of business in the same Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Metropolitan City, etc. Also under the special situation, trade name may be protected by provisional registration. Any person whose interest is likely to be harmed by ordinary people's reverse confusion of trade name has a right of claim for damages. The legal requirements for reverse confusion may be different from those of the right of trade name in the Article 23 of the Commercial Law.
참고문헌 (13)
- "상법강의(상) 제8판" (2005), 박영사
- "상법학신론(상) 제15판" (2004), 박영사
- "상법총칙ㆍ상행위 (제4전정판 )" (2003), 박영사
- "상법총칙ㆍ상행위법학" (2003), 박영사
- "상법강의(상)" (2001), 법문사
- "상법총칙ㆍ상행위법강론" (1998), 법문사
- "상법강의(상) (개정판)" (1996), 박영사
- "상법강의(상) (제3전정판)" (1985), 법문사
- "상법 제23조 제1항 소정의 ‘타인의 영업으로 오인할 수 있는 상호’의 판단기준과 상호사용에 있어서 이른바 ‘역혼동’에 의한 피해의 인정기준", (40) (2002)
- "상호권의 보호와 역혼동" (2003)
- "상호의 보호" (2002)
- "타인의 영업으로 오인할 수 있는 상호의 판단기준", 13집 (2002), 상사판례연구회
- "판례로 본 ‘타인의 영업으로 오인할 수 있는 상호‘의 판단기준 및 관련문제점", 11 (2002), 한국사법행정학회
