통신위원회 재정(裁定)의 법적 성격과 불복방법
The meaning of arbitration in Korea Communications Commission and the method of control
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Korea Communications Commission (KCC) is an independent regulatory agency, which is established by the Article 37 of Telecommunications Basic Act. And it develop and enforce policies which promote fair competition in the telecommunication marketplace, and protects the interests of telecommunications consumers also. It is charged with deliberating issues concerning fair competition environments and consumer protection of telecommunication services, and with arbitrating disputes among telecommunication service carriers and between users and carriers. It arbitrates disputes among telecommunication service carriers regarding provision of facilities, interconnection, collocation of facilities and provision of information related with the facilities, and consumers' loss or damage from telecommunications services. KCC make the exclusive(quasi-jurisdictional) decisions on arbitration. Before making arbitration, the KCC gives the concerned parties an opportunity to present an opinion and sends the arbitration in a form of a document to each party. When a lawsuit is not initiated within 60 days from the day when the document is delivered to the parties or when a lawsuits cancelled, it is deemed that an agreement is reached between the parties as the same defined in the arbitration. But the arbitration in KCC is not the arbitration in Arbitration-law, and it has not any meaning in process-law. It is just adjudication of agency. So we can bring an action against KCC for nullity of the adjudication.
Abstract
Korea Communications Commission (KCC) is an independent regulatory agency, which is established by the Article 37 of Telecommunications Basic Act. And it develop and enforce policies which promote fair competition in the telecommunication marketplace, and protects the interests of telecommunications consumers also. It is charged with deliberating issues concerning fair competition environments and consumer protection of telecommunication services, and with arbitrating disputes among telecommunication service carriers and between users and carriers. It arbitrates disputes among telecommunication service carriers regarding provision of facilities, interconnection, collocation of facilities and provision of information related with the facilities, and consumers' loss or damage from telecommunications services. KCC make the exclusive(quasi-jurisdictional) decisions on arbitration. Before making arbitration, the KCC gives the concerned parties an opportunity to present an opinion and sends the arbitration in a form of a document to each party. When a lawsuit is not initiated within 60 days from the day when the document is delivered to the parties or when a lawsuits cancelled, it is deemed that an agreement is reached between the parties as the same defined in the arbitration. But the arbitration in KCC is not the arbitration in Arbitration-law, and it has not any meaning in process-law. It is just adjudication of agency. So we can bring an action against KCC for nullity of the adjudication.
참고문헌 (8)
- 김용진, "이의신청등과 행정심판", (504) (1999)
- 박정훈, "행정심판의 기능 - 권리구제기능과 자기통제기능의 조화", 행정법연구, 15, pp.1~14 (2006), 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會)
- 백종인, "“영국의 행정심판소 제도” 전북대 법학연구", 18 (1991)
- 유지태, "통신위원회의 발전방향" (1998), 박영사
- 유지태, "통신위원회의 법적 지위", 31(2) (1998)
- 이상직, "(통신위원회를 중심으로 본) 전기통신사업법론" (1998), 진한도서
- 이시윤, "신민사소송법", pp.21~ (2005), 박영사
- 이원우, "통신시장의 공법적 규제의 구조와 문제점", (11) (2004)
