퍼블리시티권의 상속에 관한 연구
A Study of Succession of the Right of Publicity
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Today the case which from direction of a ceremony uses the name or portrait etc. of the celebrity in advertisement frequently with advancement of the television, the newspaper, the magazine and the Internet etc. information communication industry, is appearing. The eminent degree of like this celebrity is a human being, is the value even on the dignity inland personal value outside which has economically will be able to use, the economic value which is created from here as the product of old time and effort and investment a price with like this reason and a use to be a possibility of doing, to receive to allow. The right of publicity still piece where the concept is indefinite is, but when simply defines this, “about commercial use of portraitㆍname etc. right” namely, portraitㆍname etc. of the person the right which is the possibility which an economic profit will use the fact that points that person oneself commercially advertisementㆍgoods etc. and will earn there is a possibility of saying. About the right of publicity is the succession possibility about is criticism because not being provision. First of all this problem handling with property, the problem precedes. If and is recognized with property, probably will be able to transfer, and according to him also the succession will be yelled and is recognized will be the possibility which will discuss. The right of publicity only the right of property side which excludes a personal rights the above the fact that exists, must recognize with property. And like this justice must recognize a transfer. Must say that like copyright or trademark right and transfer the succession is affirmed. Rather there is worry where piece which is irrational in protection of the case assignee who negates a succession or the user will occur. Recognizes a succession but, considers the profit of public and to that continuance duration means the limit will be necessary. When setting that time-limit to, common sense of common people and must consider a politic necessity and, currently type in compliance with the judge by inference the copyright act and thinks that must do in 50 in that duration.
Abstract
Today the case which from direction of a ceremony uses the name or portrait etc. of the celebrity in advertisement frequently with advancement of the television, the newspaper, the magazine and the Internet etc. information communication industry, is appearing. The eminent degree of like this celebrity is a human being, is the value even on the dignity inland personal value outside which has economically will be able to use, the economic value which is created from here as the product of old time and effort and investment a price with like this reason and a use to be a possibility of doing, to receive to allow. The right of publicity still piece where the concept is indefinite is, but when simply defines this, “about commercial use of portraitㆍname etc. right” namely, portraitㆍname etc. of the person the right which is the possibility which an economic profit will use the fact that points that person oneself commercially advertisementㆍgoods etc. and will earn there is a possibility of saying. About the right of publicity is the succession possibility about is criticism because not being provision. First of all this problem handling with property, the problem precedes. If and is recognized with property, probably will be able to transfer, and according to him also the succession will be yelled and is recognized will be the possibility which will discuss. The right of publicity only the right of property side which excludes a personal rights the above the fact that exists, must recognize with property. And like this justice must recognize a transfer. Must say that like copyright or trademark right and transfer the succession is affirmed. Rather there is worry where piece which is irrational in protection of the case assignee who negates a succession or the user will occur. Recognizes a succession but, considers the profit of public and to that continuance duration means the limit will be necessary. When setting that time-limit to, common sense of common people and must consider a politic necessity and, currently type in compliance with the judge by inference the copyright act and thinks that must do in 50 in that duration.
참고문헌 (36)
- 구재군, "퍼블리시티권에 관한 연구 - 국회에서의 입법논의와 관련하여 -", 외법논집, (30), pp.209~234 (2008), 법학연구소
- 권국현, "Publicity권의 법적성격에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2002
- 권상로, "한류열풍과 유명 연예인 등의 퍼블리시티권에 관한 연구", 법학논총, 15(2) (2008), 조선대학교법학연구소
- 김세권, "퍼블리시티권에 관한 연구", pp.2008
- 김재형, "언론의 사실보도로 인한 인격권 침해", 법학, (106) (1998), 서울대학교 법학연구소
- 나윤수, "퍼블리시티권의 개념과 대상에 관한 고찰", 법학연구, (24), pp.435~451 (2006), 한국법학회
- 박도희, "인격권으로서 프라이버시권과 퍼블리시티권의 법리", 한양법학, 18 (2005), 한양법학회
- 박영규, "인격권, 퍼블리시티권 그리고 지적재산권", 저스티스, 112, pp.265~293 (2009), 한국법학원
- 박재영, "퍼블리시티권(The Right of Publicity)에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.1998
- 배병일, "초상권에 관한 연구", 재산법연구, 9(1) (1992), 한국재산법학회
- 배상철, "상표법상 有名人(Celebrity)의 財産的 價値가 있는 姓名,肖像의 보호문제", 산업재산권, (18), pp.217~242 (2005), 한국산업재산권법학회
- 서태환, "퍼블리시티권(Right of Publicity)의 의의와 그 양도성 및 상속성", 청주법률논단, 1 (1997), 충북법률실무연구회
- 송영식, "지적소유권법(하)" (2008), 육법사
- 오세용, "퍼블리시티권(The Right of Publicity)의 양도성ㆍ상속성에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2005
- 오승종, "저작권법" (2009), 박영사
- 유대종, "Publicity권에 관한 고찰", 석사, pp.1999
- 이건웅, "언론에 의한 인격권의 침해와 구제", 외국사법연수논집(12), 66 (1994), 법원행정처
- 이상정, "퍼블리시티권에 관한 소고", 아세아 여성법학, (4) (2001), 아세아여성법학연구소
- 이영록, "퍼블리시티권에 관한 연구(I): 저작권연구자료 43" (2003), 저작권심의조정위원회
- 이한주, "퍼블리시티권에 관하여", 사법논집, 39 (2004), 법원도서관
- 장재옥, "專屬契約에 관한 小考- 연예인 전속매니지먼트계약을 중심으로 -", 중앙법학, 7(4), pp.197~228 (2005), 중앙법학회
- 정은종, "광고관련 퍼블리시티권에 관한 고찰－분쟁사례를 중심으로", 석사, pp.2000
- 정희섭, "퍼블리시티권리의 이전성에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2002
- 정희섭, "퍼블리시티(Publicity)권에 관한 고찰－개념과 법적 성격을 중심으로", 동아대학교 대학원 논문집, (25) (2000)
- 한위수, "퍼블리서티권의 침해와 민사책임(상)", 인권과 정의, (242) (1996), 대한변호사협회
- 홍춘의, "인격권 보호에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1990
- 홍춘의, "인격권의 승인과 보호", 저스티스, 28(1) (1995), 한국법학원
- 內藤篤, "パブリシティ權槪說" (1999), 木鐸社
- 三浦正廣, "肖像權硏究序說-ドイツにおける肖像權の保護. in: 民法と著作權法の諸問題(半田正夫敎授還曆記念論文集)" (1993), 法學書院
- 豊田彰, "パブリシティの權利 Ⅱ" (2007), 日本評論社
- 豊田彰, "パブリシティの權利" (2000), 日本評論社
- Elisabeth Logeais, "The French Right of Image: an Ambiguous Concept Protecting the Human Persona", Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Journal, 19 (1998)
- J. Thomas McCarthy, "The Right of Publicity & Privacy" (1995), Clark Boardman Callaghann
- Lionel Bently, "Intellectual Property Law" (2001), Oxford University Press
- Ralph T. Rader, "The Right of Publicity", A New Dimension J. P. O. S., 61 (1970)
- Susanne Bergmann, "Publicity Rights in the United States and Germany: A Comparative Analysis", Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Journal, 19 (1999)