본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조세법률주의의 현대적 의미에 대한 소고 - 납세자의 예측가능성 보장 관점에서-

A Study on the Modern Meanings of the Principle of no Taxation without law

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The Principle of no Taxation without law was born from Magna Charta though the France declaration of human rights. It played a roll as ideology of defence of citizen against King's arbitrary taxation. However the system of society is changed and people demand the big nation, so the meaning of the principle of no taxation without law is being changed. I think that this principle shall play a roll as the guardian of the tax payer's calculability. Because when the tax payer conduct transactions, he(or she) will consider tax cost. His(Her) confidence shall be protected. It is the roll of this principle. Therefore, if the tax payer puts confidence in the executive ruling, his confidence shall be protected. And when make an interpretation of tax law, it is necessary to consider of legislative purpose, legislative intent. And when revise the period tax law(for example income tax, value added tax), it is specially important to consider the tax payer's confidence. Finally arbitration in trial must be regarded in a serious light, for it can weak the tax payer's confidence and tax compliance.

Abstract

The Principle of no Taxation without law was born from Magna Charta though the France declaration of human rights. It played a roll as ideology of defence of citizen against King's arbitrary taxation. However the system of society is changed and people demand the big nation, so the meaning of the principle of no taxation without law is being changed. I think that this principle shall play a roll as the guardian of the tax payer's calculability. Because when the tax payer conduct transactions, he(or she) will consider tax cost. His(Her) confidence shall be protected. It is the roll of this principle. Therefore, if the tax payer puts confidence in the executive ruling, his confidence shall be protected. And when make an interpretation of tax law, it is necessary to consider of legislative purpose, legislative intent. And when revise the period tax law(for example income tax, value added tax), it is specially important to consider the tax payer's confidence. Finally arbitration in trial must be regarded in a serious light, for it can weak the tax payer's confidence and tax compliance.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 김일수, "형법총론" (1996), 박영사
  2. 법원행정처, "법원실무제요(행정)" (1997), 법원도서관
  3. 이창희, "세법강의(제8판)" (2009), 박영사
  4. 임승순, "조세법" (2011), 박영사
  5. 최명근, "세법학총론" (2001), 세경사
  6. 홍준형, "행정법" (2011), 법문사
  7. 홍준형, "행정구제법" (2012), 오래
  8. 金斗炯, "租稅法의 解釋論에 관한 硏究", 박사, 법학, pp.1996
  9. 김민호, "조세법에 있어 차용개념의 해석과 적용에 관한 연구― 조세회피행위 방지와 관련하여 ―", 공법연구, 31(1), pp.27~27 (2002), 한국공법학회
  10. 김선복, "형법상 해석과 유추", 비교형사법연구 (2001), 한국비교형사법학회
  11. 김완석, "소급과세의 금지에 관한 연구", 공법연구, 32(2) (2003), 사단법인한국공법학회
  12. 김완석, "조세법연구방법론", 한국세무학회 학술대회 발표논문집 (2005), 한국세무학회
  13. 박달영, "조세불복 조정사례 분석 및 단계적 조정제도 도입 방안", 계간 세무사, (겨울) (2008), 한국세무사회
  14. 박종수, "조세법률의 소급효와 신뢰보호", 세무학연구, 24(2), pp.65~102 (2007), 한국세무학회
  15. 박훈, "조세법에 있어서 위임입법 한계의 변화-헌법재판소의 결정례를 중심으로-", 서울법학, 15(1) (2007)
  16. 신양균, "죄형법정주의에 관한 한국판례의 동향", 동북아법연구, 3(2), pp.435~456 (2009), 동북아법연구소
  17. 이동식, "조세입법의 헌법적 한계", 세무학연구, 27(3), pp.71~104 (2010), 한국세무학회
  18. 이동식, "조세법상 엄격해석원칙의 타당성 검토", 조세법연구, 17(3), pp.90~127 (2011), 한국세법학회
  19. 이전오, "대체적 조세분쟁해결절차의 도입에 관한 연구", 추계학술대회 발표논문집 (2005), 한국세무학회
  20. 이정수, "행정소송상 화해권고제도에 관한 연구", 법조, 55(4), pp.139~168 (2006), 법조협회
  21. 이철송, "기본통칙에 위반한 과세처분의 효력", 연구논문, 17 (1989)
  22. 정승환, "형법상 유추금지에 관한 고찰", 안암법학 (2001), 안암법학회
  23. 주용기, "죄형법정주의의 규범적 성격에 관한 고찰", 한양법학, 10 (1999)
  24. 허일태, "죄형법정주의의 연혁과 그 사상적 배경에 관한 연구", 법학논고, (35), pp.115~148 (2011), 법학연구원
  25. 兼平裕子, "租稅行政分野における判斷餘地の法理 -不確定槪念に対する司法審査-", 稅法學 (2010), 日本稅法學會
  26. 小林敬和, "租稅法律主義 の實質化について", 稅法学, (565) (2011), 日本税法学会
  27. 田中二郞, "租稅法" (1990), 有斐閣
  28. 占部裕典, "租稅法における文理解釋の意義と內容", 稅法學 (2010), 日本稅法學會
  29. 谷口勢津夫, "借用槪念と目的論的解釈", 稅法学, (539) (1998), 日本税法学会

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (40건)