보험사기방지에 관한 연구- 설문 · 면담조사를 통하여 검토한 사기방지 방안의 보완을 중심으로 -
A Study on the Prevention of Insurance Fraud-Focused on Supplement Designed through Survey and Interview
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
All human existences are competing with others in order to meet their desiresregardless that they may be good or evil. However, the way to satisfy the desiresshould be justifiable. Both the insured and the insurer are obliged to inform theother party of the real facts he knows himself. Therefore, the issue on insurancecrime, insurance fraud is not advantageous at all to any one side in insurancecontracts. No matter how noble concerning wealth and resources based on theologyor morality, fraud or deception cannot be justified generally. The receipt ofcommercial insurance money or public health insurance money through fraudulentacts can never be justified. Strong social sanctions are needed in this case. Thoughthere are some discussions about the issue if the Statute of Fraud applies toinsurance(life insurance) in the United States, seriousness of insurancefraud(insurance crime) is widely well recognized. So Insurance fraud is dealt withseverely(sometimes as felony). The developed countries such as Germany, Francehave severe civil or criminal punishments toward insurance fraud. In actual, insurance has had a major impact on the law of the society. Effects ofliability insurance is significant on tort law as well as on contracts, negligence,and other indemnity system. The opposition to piddling tort immunity is because ofthe possible insurance fraud of the insureds or the insurer abusing the immunity. In the US, insurance is closely related with the rental of the house, car and otherthings. Korea is no longer different. Thus, righteous operation of the insurancescheme is closely related with the task of developing soundly our whole legalsystem. In my opinion, Korea still falls short in controlling fraud in insurance contract law, insurance business law and private investigation business law as wellas criminal law. Often in the global insurance exchanges, emerges the differencebetween the national laws with the issue of jurisdiction. Therefore, in particularinternational insurance contract’s conclusion (including reinsurance), the default ofcontrolling insurance fraud in Korea would be regarded as the mark of legalsystem’s flaw. Thus, the Commercial Act(Insurance contract), the InsuranceBusiness Act, the Criminal Act and the Private investigation business lawregulating the fraud should be strengthened. In addition, social ethics should berestored to suppress the fraud.
Abstract
All human existences are competing with others in order to meet their desiresregardless that they may be good or evil. However, the way to satisfy the desiresshould be justifiable. Both the insured and the insurer are obliged to inform theother party of the real facts he knows himself. Therefore, the issue on insurancecrime, insurance fraud is not advantageous at all to any one side in insurancecontracts. No matter how noble concerning wealth and resources based on theologyor morality, fraud or deception cannot be justified generally. The receipt ofcommercial insurance money or public health insurance money through fraudulentacts can never be justified. Strong social sanctions are needed in this case. Thoughthere are some discussions about the issue if the Statute of Fraud applies toinsurance(life insurance) in the United States, seriousness of insurancefraud(insurance crime) is widely well recognized. So Insurance fraud is dealt withseverely(sometimes as felony). The developed countries such as Germany, Francehave severe civil or criminal punishments toward insurance fraud. In actual, insurance has had a major impact on the law of the society. Effects ofliability insurance is significant on tort law as well as on contracts, negligence,and other indemnity system. The opposition to piddling tort immunity is because ofthe possible insurance fraud of the insureds or the insurer abusing the immunity. In the US, insurance is closely related with the rental of the house, car and otherthings. Korea is no longer different. Thus, righteous operation of the insurancescheme is closely related with the task of developing soundly our whole legalsystem. In my opinion, Korea still falls short in controlling fraud in insurance contract law, insurance business law and private investigation business law as wellas criminal law. Often in the global insurance exchanges, emerges the differencebetween the national laws with the issue of jurisdiction. Therefore, in particularinternational insurance contract’s conclusion (including reinsurance), the default ofcontrolling insurance fraud in Korea would be regarded as the mark of legalsystem’s flaw. Thus, the Commercial Act(Insurance contract), the InsuranceBusiness Act, the Criminal Act and the Private investigation business lawregulating the fraud should be strengthened. In addition, social ethics should berestored to suppress the fraud.
참고문헌 (86)
- 강위두, "상법강의(하)" (2004), 형설출판사
- 금융감독원, "보험범죄 형사판례집" (2012), 금융감독원
- 김일수, "형법각론" (2003), 법문사
- 김정호, "상법강의(하), 제 2 판" (2005), 法文社
- 김종원, "형법각론(상)" (1971), 법문사
- 박용섭, "해상보험법" (1995), 효성출판사
- 배종대, "형법각론" (2006), 홍문사
- 서돈각, "제4전정 상법강의" (1996), 법문사
- 손주찬, "제11정증보판 상법" (2005), 박영사
- 심재두, "해상보험법" (1995), 길안사
- 양승규, "보험법" (2005), 삼영사
- 유기천, "형법학(각론강의)" (1982), 일조각
- 이기수, "보험해상법" (2003), 박영사
- 임 웅, "형법각론" (2005), 법문사
- 정영일, "형법각론" (2008), 박영사
- 정찬형, "상법강의(하)" (2009), 박영사
- 정희철, "상법학(하)" (1990), 박영사
- 채이식, "상법강의(하)" (2003), 박영사
- 최기원, "상법학신론(하)" (2004), 박영사
- 최준선, "보험법·해상법" (2005), 삼영사
- 김성태, "보험계약상의 고의· 중과실면책원칙", 보험학회지, (25) (1990)
- 김은경, "보험계약법상 보험사기에 대한 고찰− 보험사기의 유형화를 중심으로 −", 안암법학, (43), pp.845~881 (2014), 안암법학회
- 박민영, "미국에서의 범죄행위에 대한 엄정대응의 원칙", 비교법연구, 11(3) (2011), 동국대 비교법문화연구소
- 박은구, "성 토마스 아퀴나스의 경제사상(1)", 숭실사학, (32), pp.311~356 (2014), 숭실사학회
- 박형민, "보험범죄 형사판례 연구", 월간 손해보험, (533) (2013), 손해보험협회
- 배철효, "보험사기에 관한 실태와 대응방안", 한국경찰연구, 4(2) (2005)
- 성수훈, "우리나라 보험사기의 실태와 효과적 대처방안", 보험법연구, 5(2) (2011)
- 송윤아, "보험사기 방지를 위한 입법노력의 한계와 향후 고려사항", KIRI, (272) (2014), 보험연구원
- 신의기, "교통사고환자의 장기입원과 사기행위", 형사정책연구, 20(1), pp.519~544 (2009), 한국형사정책연구원
- 양기진, "보험사기 방지를 위한 보험계약법 개정방향", 법학연구, 55(3), pp.131~154 (2014), 법학연구소
- 양채열, "보험사기범죄에 대한 분석 : 고의 교통사고 유도 - 합의금 요구 사건을 중심으로", 재무관리연구, 23(1), pp.227~242 (2006), 한국재무관리학회
- 유용봉, "사이버테러범죄에 관한 형사법적 연구", 한국치안행정논집, 7(4), pp.127~146 (2011), 한국치안행정학회
- 이명진, "보험사기행동모형 개발에 관한 실증적 연구", 한국IT서비스학회지, 6(2), pp.1~18 (2007), 한국IT서비스학회
- 이병희, "보험사기죄에서의 실행의 착수와 기수시기", 형사법연구, (11) (1999), 한국형사 법학회
- 이창훈, "범죄학과 인간본성론Ⅱ- 다면적(多面的) 인간본성의 범죄학 적용 : 다면적 인간본성의 역동적(力動的) 개념화(槪念化)", 교정담론, 4(1), pp.195~228 (2010), 아시아교정포럼
- 장상훈, "화재보험관련 보험사기 조사현황 및 효율적 대처방안", 방재와 보험 (2009)
- 정준택, "보험범죄와 방화", 한국화재조사학회 제24회 학술대회 (2012)
- 조해균, "범 국가적 차원의 보험사기 대처방안에 관한 연구", 경제연구, 22(2) (2001), 한양대 경제연구소
- 조해균, "도덕적 위험관리", 보험감독원 보험연수원, ~ (1992)
- 최병호, "보험사기와 윤리적 딜레마 상황의 개선방안", 교통기술과 정책, 9(3) (2012)
- 최석윤, "보험과 형법", 비교형사법연구, 8(2), pp.765~786 (2006), 한국비교형사법학회
- 최종윤, "민간조사제도의 도입과 업무범위 설정", 한국경찰연구, 11(1), pp.225~244 (2012), 한국경찰연구학회[DOI]
- 탁희성, "보험범죄에 관한 연구", 형사정책연구 (2000), 한국형사정책연구원
- 황만성, "요양급여비용 허위청구와 사기죄의 법적 쟁점", 의료법학, 14(2), pp.11~41 (2013), 대한의료법학회
- 岡田豊基, "現代保險法" (2010), 中央經濟社
- 堀田一吉, "保險進化と保險事業" (2006), 慶應義塾大學出版會
- 大塚英明, "新保險法と保險契約法理の新たな展開" (2009), ぎょうせい
- 潘 阿憲, "保險法槪說" (2010), 中央經濟社
- 本間照光, "保險の社會學" (2010), 勁草書房
- 山野嘉朗, "保險契約と消費者保護の法理" (2007), 成文堂
- 山野嘉朗, "現代保險·海商法30講" (2010), 中央經濟社
- 石田 滿, "保險判例" (2010), 保險每日新聞社
- 小暮雅一, "保險の數學" (2010), 保險每日新聞社
- 櫻井健夫, "保險法" (2009), 日本評論社
- 萩本 修, "保險法" (2009), 商事法務
- 諸外國における防犯·防災對策の實態-保險犯罪を中として-, "櫻井大二", 財團法人 損害保險事業總合硏究所硏究部, ~ (2005)
- 村田敏一, "保險法改正の論点" (2009), 法律文化社
- B. Lyde, "Insurance law handbook" (2008), Tottel
- E. Fischer, "Principles of Insurance Law" (2006), LexisNexis
- Gerhard Wagner, "Tort law and liability insurance" (2005), Springer
- J. A. Park, "Marine Insurance" (2005), Lawbook Exchange
- J. S. Diaconis, "Reinsurance Law" (2007), Practising Law Institute
- John F. Dobbyn, "Insurance law in a nutshell" (2003), West
- K. S. Abraham, "Insurance law and regulation" (2005), Foundation
- Lori Valigra, "Multimedia Peninsula, Global Telephony, Lexis", News Library, ~ (1997)
- Malcolm Clarke, "Policies and perceptions of insurance law in the twenty-first century" (2005), Oxford
- Muriel L. Crawford, "Life and Health Insurance Law" (1998), Loma
- Nael G. Bunni, "Risk and insurance in construction" (2003), Spon
- Peter M. Lencsis, "Insurance regulation in the United States" (1997), Quorum
- Tom Baker, "Insurance law and policy" (2003), Aspen
- Beckmann – Matusche Beckmann, "Versicherungsrechts Handbuch" (2009), C. H. Beck
- Bruck, "VVG" (2010), De Gruyter
- G. A, Benkel, "Der Versicherungsverein auf Gegenseitigkeit" (2002), C. H. Beck
- Hermann Blei, "Strafrecht Ⅱ" (1983)
- Hubert W. van Bühren, "Versicherungsrecht" (2009), Deutscher Anwalt
- Karl Sieg, "Allgemeines Versicherungsvertragsrecht" (1994), Gabler
- Looschelders, "Versicherungsvertragsrecht" (2011), Kohlhammer
- Looschelders, "VVG" (2011), Carl Heymanns Verlag
- Manfred Wandt, "Versicherungrecht" (2009), Carl Heymanns
- Maurach, "Strafrecht Besonderer Tell, Teilband Ⅰ" (1977)
- Meixner, "Allgemeines Versicherungsvertragsrecht" (2011), C.H.Beck
- Peter Schimikowski, "Versicherungsvertragsrecht" (2009), C. H. Beck
- Prölss, "VVG" (2010), C. H. Beck
- W. Rüffner, "VVG" (2009), Nomos
- Welzel, "Das Deutsche Strafrecht" (1969)