본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

증권인수인의 주의의무와 손해배상책임에 관한 연구

A Study on Due Diligence Defence against the Liability of the Underwriter

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

If the person acquired securities suffers damages from a false description or representation of any material fact in a registration statement and an investment prospectus or omitting a material fact therefrom, underwriters are liable for the damages under Article 125, section (1)(5) of Capital Market and Financial Investment Business Act(the “Act”). In this connection, several issues would arise regarding to whether it is desirable to have underwriters be liable for a false description or representation of a registration statement and investment prospectus even though issuers are primarily responsible for preparing those documents, the level of due diligence which could be regarded as appropriate for exempting from underwriters’ liabilities. The reason why underwriters are liable for false description of business report are based on the necessity of protecting investors regarding to the practice of underwriters and status of stock market. Regarding to the interpretation for Article 125, Section (1) of Act, that is reasonable care,this paper suggests that it is appropriate if underwriters had, after reasonable investigation,reasonable ground to believe and did believe that the statements therein were true and that there was no omission to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading. The Act prescribes that lead underwriter is only liable for damages when multiple underwriters are engaged in underwriting. It is desirable to extend the scope of underwriter liable for damages to managing underwriters or participant underwriters.

Abstract

If the person acquired securities suffers damages from a false description or representation of any material fact in a registration statement and an investment prospectus or omitting a material fact therefrom, underwriters are liable for the damages under Article 125, section (1)(5) of Capital Market and Financial Investment Business Act(the “Act”). In this connection, several issues would arise regarding to whether it is desirable to have underwriters be liable for a false description or representation of a registration statement and investment prospectus even though issuers are primarily responsible for preparing those documents, the level of due diligence which could be regarded as appropriate for exempting from underwriters’ liabilities. The reason why underwriters are liable for false description of business report are based on the necessity of protecting investors regarding to the practice of underwriters and status of stock market. Regarding to the interpretation for Article 125, Section (1) of Act, that is reasonable care,this paper suggests that it is appropriate if underwriters had, after reasonable investigation,reasonable ground to believe and did believe that the statements therein were true and that there was no omission to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading. The Act prescribes that lead underwriter is only liable for damages when multiple underwriters are engaged in underwriting. It is desirable to extend the scope of underwriter liable for damages to managing underwriters or participant underwriters.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 고창현, "부실기재관련 증권소송에서의 인과관계와 증명책임" (2005), 전국경제인연합회
  2. 윤광균, "증권거래법원론" (2006), 육법사
  3. 김정수, "현대증권법원론" (2002), 박영사
  4. 김병연, "유가증권신고서 등의 부실기재와 인수인의 손해배상책임에있어서 Due Diligence 항변에 관한 연구", 상사법연구, 22(5), pp.111~153 (2004), 한국상사법학회
  5. 서완석, "증권거래법상의 부실표시에 대한 손해배상책임", 기업법연구, (16), pp.205~234 (2004), 한국기업법학회
  6. 이동신, "유가증권공시서류의 부실기재에 관한 책임: 증권거래에 관한 제문제(상)", 증권거래에 관한 제문제(상),재판자료 제90집,법원도서관, (90) (2001), 법원도서관
  7. 이준섭, "증권집단소송제의 전제조건으로서의 손해배상책임제도의 정비방안" (2004), 전국경제인연합회
  8. 이형기, "증권인수인의 주의의무에 관한 고찰", 기업법연구, 19(2), pp.201~224 (2005), 한국기업법학회
  9. 임재연, "증권거래법(전정판)" (2006), 박영사
  10. 원용수, "미국 증권법에 따른 민ㆍ형사 책임", 경영법률, 8 (1998)
  11. 증권집단소송 연착륙을 위한 제도 보완과제, "전국경제인연합회", 전국경제인연합회, ~ (2005)
  12. "v. Laventhal, Kreckstein, Horwath and Horwath, 2d", pp.516~, Competitive Assoc’s Inc
  13. "Escott v. BarChris Construction Co., 283 F. Supp. 643", ~ (1968)
  14. Folk, "Civil Liabilities under the Federal Securities Act : The Bar Chris Case", ecurities Law Review (1969)
  15. "H. R. Rep. No. 85, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. at 4", ~ (1933)
  16. Richard W. Jennings, "Securities Regulation Cases and Materials (5th ed.)" (1982)
  17. Therese H. Maynard, "The Affirmative Defense of Reasonable Care Under Section 12(2) of the Securities Act of 1933", Notre Dame Law Review, 69 (1933)
  18. "University Hill Foundation v. Goldman Sachs & Co.", S.D.N.Y, (879), pp.442~ (1976)
  19. 野村證券株式会社法務部ㆍ川村 和夫, "注解証券取引法" (1997), 有斐閣
  20. 三井秀範, "課徴金制度と民事賠償責任" (2005), 金融財政事情研究会
  21. 黒沼 悦郎, "証券取引法入門" (1995), 商事法務

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)