본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

海上交通管制와 國家賠償責任에 관한 考察

A Review on Vessel Traffic Services and State Liability

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Vessel Traffic Service (hereunder, ‘VTS’) is a term applied to “a collection ofmarine traffic control systems of varying levels of sophistication which aredesigned to impose external supervision and control on vessel movements”, rangingfrom mere monitoring of vessel position to actual positive control of vessel course,speed, and other movement. VTS is designed to improve the safety and efficiencyof vessel traffic and to protect the environment. The principal authority for theVTS is Section 36 of the Maritime Safety Act and Section 28 of the Public Order InOpen Ports Act. As it is commonly recognized, VTS is the most effective device forthe safety of vessels and protection of marine environment within the open portlimit or fairways where there is potential for disaster created by increased trafficof large and cumbersome vessels, giving some powers to instruct or direct vesselswithin VTS area is highly recommended. Upon taking into account that it isreasonable that the master should be held liable to a greater extent for the safetynavigation of his vessel, a master’s opinion on safe navigation of his vessel shouldbe respected and VTS is not relieving the master to control vessel movement. However cooperation and communication between the VTS center and the vessel areessential facts for safety navigation of vessel, since we can not totally rely upon aship’s master who often becomes as a one side of the collision or allision accident. To this sense, it is needed to empower VTS center to instruct and control thevessels’ movement within harbour limit. Meanwhile, considering the objectives ofVTS, improvement of the safety and efficiency of navigation, safety of life at seaand the protection of the marine environment, VTS operators, non-performance oftheir legal duties and/or legal obligations for the safe navigation of vessels maycause the state's liability for the compensation of the victims.

Abstract

Vessel Traffic Service (hereunder, ‘VTS’) is a term applied to “a collection ofmarine traffic control systems of varying levels of sophistication which aredesigned to impose external supervision and control on vessel movements”, rangingfrom mere monitoring of vessel position to actual positive control of vessel course,speed, and other movement. VTS is designed to improve the safety and efficiencyof vessel traffic and to protect the environment. The principal authority for theVTS is Section 36 of the Maritime Safety Act and Section 28 of the Public Order InOpen Ports Act. As it is commonly recognized, VTS is the most effective device forthe safety of vessels and protection of marine environment within the open portlimit or fairways where there is potential for disaster created by increased trafficof large and cumbersome vessels, giving some powers to instruct or direct vesselswithin VTS area is highly recommended. Upon taking into account that it isreasonable that the master should be held liable to a greater extent for the safetynavigation of his vessel, a master’s opinion on safe navigation of his vessel shouldbe respected and VTS is not relieving the master to control vessel movement. However cooperation and communication between the VTS center and the vessel areessential facts for safety navigation of vessel, since we can not totally rely upon aship’s master who often becomes as a one side of the collision or allision accident. To this sense, it is needed to empower VTS center to instruct and control thevessels’ movement within harbour limit. Meanwhile, considering the objectives ofVTS, improvement of the safety and efficiency of navigation, safety of life at seaand the protection of the marine environment, VTS operators, non-performance oftheir legal duties and/or legal obligations for the safe navigation of vessels maycause the state's liability for the compensation of the victims.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 김원욱, "해상충돌방지 및 원활한 교통흐름을 위한 VTS관제의 중요성", 한국방제학회지, 7(4) (2007), 한국방제학회
  2. 김진권, "VTS의 國家賠償責任에 관한 考察", 해사법연구, 20(3), pp.395~428 (2008), 한국해사법학회
  3. 박균성, "행정법론" (2014), 박영사
  4. 박찬호, "국제해양법" (2009), 지인북스
  5. 이상일, "해상교통관제제도와 국가배상에 관한 연구", 해사법연구, 21(1), pp.61~94 (2009), 한국해사법학회
  6. 이치경, "VTS 관제사의 법적 책임과 의무", 한국마린엔지니어링학회 2007년도 전기학술대회 논문집 (2007), 한국마린엔지니어링학회
  7. 임을빈, "선박교통관제제도(VTS)란 무엇인가?①", 해양한국 (1995), 한국해사문제연구소
  8. 해양수산부, "1993-2012 해상교통관제 백서" (2013)
  9. 홍정선, "행정법원론(상)", 박영사
  10. Boyd N. Boland, "Vessel Traffic Services and Liability for Oil Spills and Other Maritime Accidents", Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 18(3) (1980)
  11. Craig H. Allen, "Hiding Behind Tradition? Should U.S. Vessel Traffic Centers Exercise Greater Direction and Control over Vessels in Their Areas?", Tulane Maritime Law Journal, 34(1) (2009), Tulane University
  12. Henrik Ringborn, "The EU Maritime Safety Policy and International Law" (2008), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers
  13. IALA, "VESSEL TRAFFIC SERVICE MANUAL" (2012)
  14. "해양수산부 해상교통관제센터 홈페이지"[URL]
  15. "U.S. Coast Guard San Francisco Sector 홈페이지"[URL]
  16. "진도해상관제센터에 세월호는 없었다"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)