‘및’의 통사적 특성과 접속 양상에 대한 고찰
A Study on the Syntactic properties and Aspects of use of ‘및’ - Focusing on the comparison with the ‘와/과’ -
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims at the structure of [NP1과 NP2], [NP1 및 NP2] in which both ‘와/과’ and ‘및’ can appear, and tries to reveal the syntactic properties and aspects of use of ‘및’ through comparing with ‘와/과’ based on corpus usage examples and internet data. The research results can be summarized as follows. Regarding the syntactic properties of ‘와/과’ and ‘및’, ‘와/과’ and ‘및’ can both connect nouns (phrases), but there is a difference in that ‘와/과’ can connect postpositional phrases, and ‘및’ can connect prenoun of ‘XX적’ or roots. Second, when the predicate has [+Reciprocity], ‘와/과’ is preferred over ‘및’. Finally, if ‘와/과’ and ‘및’ are used repeatedly when connecting three or more noun phrases, the sentence may become unnatural. Therefore, in this case, ‘와/과’ and ‘및’ often appear together. When noun phrases are connected equally, ‘및’ follows ‘와/과’. But When connecting noun phrases that are not semantically equivalent, ‘및’ is used more between the two noun phrases that are semantically closer regardless of location. On this occasion, it can be seen that the range of connection of ‘및’ is smaller than that of ‘와/과’. Finally, when the syntactic level of the ‘와/과’ noun phrase and the ‘및’ noun phrase are different, the sentence is natural even if the order of concatenation of ‘와/과’ and ‘및’ is reversed.
Abstract
This study aims at the structure of [NP1과 NP2], [NP1 및 NP2] in which both ‘와/과’ and ‘및’ can appear, and tries to reveal the syntactic properties and aspects of use of ‘및’ through comparing with ‘와/과’ based on corpus usage examples and internet data. The research results can be summarized as follows. Regarding the syntactic properties of ‘와/과’ and ‘및’, ‘와/과’ and ‘및’ can both connect nouns (phrases), but there is a difference in that ‘와/과’ can connect postpositional phrases, and ‘및’ can connect prenoun of ‘XX적’ or roots. Second, when the predicate has [+Reciprocity], ‘와/과’ is preferred over ‘및’. Finally, if ‘와/과’ and ‘및’ are used repeatedly when connecting three or more noun phrases, the sentence may become unnatural. Therefore, in this case, ‘와/과’ and ‘및’ often appear together. When noun phrases are connected equally, ‘및’ follows ‘와/과’. But When connecting noun phrases that are not semantically equivalent, ‘및’ is used more between the two noun phrases that are semantically closer regardless of location. On this occasion, it can be seen that the range of connection of ‘및’ is smaller than that of ‘와/과’. Finally, when the syntactic level of the ‘와/과’ noun phrase and the ‘및’ noun phrase are different, the sentence is natural even if the order of concatenation of ‘와/과’ and ‘및’ is reversed.
참고문헌 (18)
- 김동식, "현대 국어 조사의 분류에 대한 연구", 한신논문집, 13, pp.105~142 (1996), 한신대학교 출판부
- 김영희, "대칭 관계와 접속 조사 ‘와’", 한글, 154, pp.39~61 (1974), 한글학회
- 김영희, "‘와’의 양상", 국어국문학, 65ㆍ66, pp.53~81 (1974), 국어국문학회
- 김영희, "여동 구문의 ‘와’", 국어학, 38, pp.155~182 (2001), 국어학회
- 김완진, "구문 접속의 ‘와’와 구 접속의 ‘와’", 어학연구, 6(2), pp.1~10 (1970), 서울대학교 언어교육원
- 김준희, "‘과’의 통사·의미 분석", 한말연구, 12, pp.1~39 (2003), 한말연구학회
- 김종록, "국어 접속의 다단계성과 접속소의 기능(1)", 국어교육연구, 31, pp.127~151 (1999), 국어교육학회
- 남기심, "토씨 ‘와", 과’의 쓰임에 대하여, 1990, pp.66, 221~239[DOI]
- 박호관, "국어 접속 명사구의 통사 구조와 의미", 우리말글, 24, pp.23~40 (2002), 우리말글학회
- 배진영, "구어·문어 사용역에 따른 어휘 사용 양상 연구-접속부사를 중심으로-", 한국사전학, (23), pp.95~129 (2014), 한국사전학회[DOI]
- 배진영, "구어·문어 통합 문법 기술Ⅰ-어휘부류" (2013), 박이정
- 손남익, "국어 부사 연구" (1995), 박이정
- 양정석, "교호성과 '-와'", 배달말, (35), pp.369~408 (2004), 배달말학회
- 이정화, "현대국어의 접속조사 연구", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.1998
- 이찬규, "‘및’의 의미와 통사적 기능", 어문론집, 26, pp.83~117 (1998), 중앙어문학회
- 임유종, "접속부사의 구문론적 특성", 언어학, (28), pp.177~209 (2001), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 임홍빈, "NP-병렬의 {와", 과}에 대하여, 1972, pp.4, 141~164[DOI]
- 한희정, "언어 사용역에 따른 접속 부사의 사용 양상 연구", 한국어 의미학, 54, pp.175~202 (2016), 한국어의미학회[DOI]