영어, 한국어 구어성 담화의 선호 논항 구조 분석
Preferred Argument Structure Analysis in Orate Discourses of English and Korean Language
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purposes of this study were to reset the preferred argument structure constraints within the framework of Korean language and examine diverse types of texts. The research findings and conclusions were as follows:First, the percentage of two or more lexical arguments appearing in a single clause was very low both in English and Korean. Second, the frequency of pronouns was very high in English than in Korean, and so was the frequency of the subjects of transitive verbs appearing as pronouns. In spoken Korean, the frequency of pronouns being used was much lower than omitted arguments. In written Korean, however, the cases in which arguments were expressed lexically were considerably many, which indicates that the constraints on the subjects of lexical transitive verbs are too strong to be applied to written Korean. Third, the constraint that the number of new information arguments should be one or less was well observed across all types of texts both in English and Korean. Fourth, the frequency of the subjects of transitive verbs conveying new information was very low. The syntactic completion of sentences related to pragmatic characteristics can be enhanced by analyzing the argument structures and then tracing annotations escaping the typical preferred argument structures.
Abstract
The purposes of this study were to reset the preferred argument structure constraints within the framework of Korean language and examine diverse types of texts. The research findings and conclusions were as follows:First, the percentage of two or more lexical arguments appearing in a single clause was very low both in English and Korean. Second, the frequency of pronouns was very high in English than in Korean, and so was the frequency of the subjects of transitive verbs appearing as pronouns. In spoken Korean, the frequency of pronouns being used was much lower than omitted arguments. In written Korean, however, the cases in which arguments were expressed lexically were considerably many, which indicates that the constraints on the subjects of lexical transitive verbs are too strong to be applied to written Korean. Third, the constraint that the number of new information arguments should be one or less was well observed across all types of texts both in English and Korean. Fourth, the frequency of the subjects of transitive verbs conveying new information was very low. The syntactic completion of sentences related to pragmatic characteristics can be enhanced by analyzing the argument structures and then tracing annotations escaping the typical preferred argument structures.
참고문헌 (9)
- 김미경, "한국어 문어체 담화와 대화체 담화의 선호논항구조 비교", 언어, 27(3), pp.315~343 (2002), 한국언어학회
- 정명순, "담화별 선호 논항 구조: 자연스러운 담화를 위한 화자의 전략", 석사, pp.2003
- Biber, D., "Dimensions of Register Variation : A Cross-linguistic Comparison" (1995), Cambridge University Press
- Clancy, P. M., "The lexicon in interaction: Developmental origins of preferred argument structure in Korean, In Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function", pp.81~108 (2003), John Benjamins Publishing
- Dixon, R. M. W., "Ergativity" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Du Bois, J. W., "The discourse basis of ergativity", Language, 63(4), pp.805~855 (1987)
- Kumpf, L. E., "Preferred argument structure in second language discourse: A preliminary study", Studies in Language, 16, pp.369~403 (1992)
- Radford, A., "An Introduction to English Sentence Structure" (2009), Cambridge University Press
- 김기혁, "언어유형론: 형태론과 통사론" (2009), 보고사