Effect of Saliva Contamination Stage and Different Decontamination Procedures on Bonding Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to compare the bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) to dentin with saliva contamination at different stages and using different decontamination procedures. Extracted human permanent molars were embedded onto acrylic resin with the dentin surface exposed. Group I was a control group that was conditioned with polyacrylic acid (PAA). Groups II and III were contaminated with saliva before PAA conditioning and Groups IV, V, and VI were contaminated with saliva after PAA conditioning. After saliva contamination, Groups II and IV were dried, Groups III and V were rinsed and dried, and Group VI was additionally conditioned with PAA. After surface treatment, the dentin specimens were filled with RMGI. Group I showed significantly higher bond strength than the other groups. Group VI showed a significantly higher bond strength than the other saliva contaminated groups. However, there were no significant differences in the failure mode between the different groups. Saliva contamination impaired the bond strength of RMGI to dentin, regardless of when the saliva contamination occurred. Decontamination with washing and drying could not improve the shear bond strength of RMGIC. When saliva contamination occurred after PAA conditioning, additional PAA conditioning improved the shear bond strength.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) to dentin with saliva contamination at different stages and using different decontamination procedures. Extracted human permanent molars were embedded onto acrylic resin with the dentin surface exposed. Group I was a control group that was conditioned with polyacrylic acid (PAA). Groups II and III were contaminated with saliva before PAA conditioning and Groups IV, V, and VI were contaminated with saliva after PAA conditioning. After saliva contamination, Groups II and IV were dried, Groups III and V were rinsed and dried, and Group VI was additionally conditioned with PAA. After surface treatment, the dentin specimens were filled with RMGI. Group I showed significantly higher bond strength than the other groups. Group VI showed a significantly higher bond strength than the other saliva contaminated groups. However, there were no significant differences in the failure mode between the different groups. Saliva contamination impaired the bond strength of RMGI to dentin, regardless of when the saliva contamination occurred. Decontamination with washing and drying could not improve the shear bond strength of RMGIC. When saliva contamination occurred after PAA conditioning, additional PAA conditioning improved the shear bond strength.
참고문헌 (22)
- Mickenautsch S, "Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations : a meta-analysis", Eur J Paediatr Dent, 10, pp.41~46 (2009)
- American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, "Guideline on Restorative Dentistry", Pediatr Dent, 38, pp.250~262 (2016)
- Shih WY, "Effects of saliva contamination on the shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement to primary teeth dentin", J Dent Sci, 1, pp.101~106 (2006)
- Safar JA, "Effect of saliva contamination on the bond of dentin to resin-modified glass-ionomer cement", Oper Dent, 24, pp.351~357 (1999)
- Eiriksson SO, "Effects of saliva contamination on resin-resin bond strength", Dent Mater, 20, pp.37~44 (2004)
- Humphrey SP, "A review of saliva : normal composition, flow, and function", J Prosthet Dent, 85, pp.162~169 (2001)
- Forss H, "The post-amalgam era : a selection of materials and their longevity in the primary and young permanent dentitions", Int J Paediatr Dent, 13, pp.158~164 (2003)
- Powis DR, "Improved adhesion of a glass ionomer cement to dentin and enamel", J Dent Res, 61, pp.1416~1422 (1982)
- Imbery TA, "Evaluating dentin surface treatments for resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials", Oper Dent, 38, pp.429~438 (2013)
- Townsend RD, "The effect of saliva contamination on enamel and dentin using a self-etching adhesive", J Am Dent Assoc, 135, pp.895~901 (2004)
- Sattabanasuk V, "Effects of saliva contamination on dentin bond strength using all-in-one adhesives", J Adhes Dent, 8, pp.311~318 (2006)
- Jiang Q, "Effect of saliva contamination and decontamination on bovine enamel bond strength of four self-etching adhesives", Oper Dent, 35, pp.194~202 (2010)
- Silverstone LM, "Oral fluid contamination of etched enamel surfaces : an SEM study", J Am Dent Assoc, 110, pp.329~332 (1985)
- Fink AL, "Classification of acid denaturation of proteins : intermediates and unfolded states", Biochemistry, 33, pp.12504~12511 (1994)
- Tezvergil-Mutluay A, "Effect of phosphoric acid on the degradation of human dentin matrix", J Dent Res, 92, pp.87~91 (2013)
- 김자양, "The effect of saliva decontamination procedures on dentin bond strength after universal adhesive curing", Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, 40(4), pp.299~305 (2015), 대한치과보존학회
- Justin RM, "Effect of salivary contamination on the bond strength of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems : an in vitro study", J Contemp Dent Pract, 13, pp.655~660 (2012)
- Suryakumari NB, "In vitro evaluation of influence of salivary contamination on the dentin bond strength of one-bottle adhesive systems", Contemp Clin Dent, 2, pp.160~164 (2011)
- Cacciafesta V, "Use of a selfetching primer in combination with a resin-modified glass ionomer : effect of water and saliva contamination on shear bond strength", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124, pp.420~426 (2003)
- Tay FR, "Effect of different conditioning protocols on adhesion of a GIC to dentin", J Adhes Dent, 3, pp.153~167 (2001)
- Hiraishi N, "Effect of artificial saliva contamination on pH value change and dentin bond strength", Dent Mater, 19, pp.429~434 (2003)
- Dursun E, "Combination of a self-etching adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer : effect of water and saliva contamination on bond strength to dentin", J Adhes Dent, 13, pp.439~443 (2011)