정제두와 서인-노론계의 학술 교유

Abstract

This article examines Jeong Je-du’s co-relation and academic contents. To this end, this article analyzed 267 letters, which were that Jeong Je-du sent to more than 58 people from 1667 to 1732. As a result, it was found that the relationship of Jeong Je-du’s co-relation showed a tendency to become the Soron with time. Nonetheless, until the latter half of his life, he continued to cooperate with the Seoin-Noron’s line at 10%. This was possible because the interactions with the people in the special relationship still continued, although the partisans were different. The special relationship was a marital relationship such as Min Jin-juㆍSeo Han-juㆍ Yi Hui-jo or a school relationship such as Yi Jing-myeongㆍJeong Chan-hwiㆍKim Gan. Seoin-Noron’s line, who interacted with Jeong Je-du, were eleven people including Song Si-yeolㆍMin Jeong-jungㆍKim Su-hang. All of them were disciples of Song Si-yeol and interacted with him. In large part, Jeong Je-du and their relationship could be regarded as Seoin with academic homogeneity. In a small way, this relationship could be seen as a sort of school of the same teacher, who was Song Si-yeol. Jeong Je-du revised the initial method of study by arguing with Yi Jing-myeong, and proceeded with the arguments of Kim GanㆍJeong Chan-hwi. In the meantime, the Yangming argument centered on Jeong Je-du was studied as a problem inside the Soron or the school of Park Se-chea. However, Yangming argument of Jeong Je-du and Kim GanㆍJeong Chan-hwi in this paper is important because it is a criticism of Jeong Je-du as a Yangming scholar in the Seoin-Noron’s line. In addition, the following academic exchanges between Jingdeo and Seoin-Noron were also conducted. It was the problem of the construction of the Jaunseowon’s costume, the difference of interpretation about the scholarship of Seo Gyeong-deok, the preservation of Gija(箕子) Jeongjeon(井田) left in Pyongyang. Although the Jeong Je-du posed a tendency to Soron according to the temporal flow, the relationship with Seoin-Noron’s line still taked a considerable part in his co-relation. There was also no major difference in the main content of academic exchanges. Therefore, I think that it is necessary to reevaluate Jeong Je-du as a scholar who had carried out various intellectual activities regardless of the party, rather than confining it to the framework of the Soron’s scholars who studied Yangming.