본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

임상의 전공에 따른 임신성 당뇨 산모의 주산기 예후 비교: 산과 vs. 내분비내과

Comparison of Perinatal Outcomes According to the Majority of Physicians: Obstetrics Versus Endocrinology

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: To compare the perinatal outcomes among the majority of physicians who manage pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), particularly those who require insulin treatment. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study involving 206 singleton pregnant women diagnosed with GDM between January 2017 and September 2022. The study participants were divided into 2 groups according to the majority of physicians (obstetrics vs. endocrinology). We compared the maternal characteristics and perinatal outcomes between the 2 groups and performed a subgroup analysis of preterm birth cases. Results: During the study period, 206 pregnant women were diagnosed with GDM and 36.9% (76 of 206) required insulin treatment. Among the GDM A2 pregnancies, 26 patients visited or consulted endocrinologists, and 50 patients were managed by obstetricians. There were no significant differences in maternal characteristics and perinatal outcomes between the two groups. Eighteen infants were delivered before 37 weeks of gestation (12 in the obstetrician group and 6 in the endocrinologist group). In preterm-delivered patients, the birth weight was heavier in the endocrinology group (median [range], 2.66 [1.98–3.77] vs. 3.71 [2.48–4.17], p=0.025) despite similar gestational age at delivery (median [range], 35.5 [33.1–36.5] vs. 36.0 [34.2–36.6], p=0.511). However, there were no significant differences in perinatal outcomes, including the rate of neonatal hypoglycemia, oxygen treatment and the duration of neonatal intensive care unit admission. Conclusion: Our data show that GDM can be managed by obstetricians even in cases requiring insulin treatment.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the perinatal outcomes among the majority of physicians who manage pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), particularly those who require insulin treatment. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study involving 206 singleton pregnant women diagnosed with GDM between January 2017 and September 2022. The study participants were divided into 2 groups according to the majority of physicians (obstetrics vs. endocrinology). We compared the maternal characteristics and perinatal outcomes between the 2 groups and performed a subgroup analysis of preterm birth cases. Results: During the study period, 206 pregnant women were diagnosed with GDM and 36.9% (76 of 206) required insulin treatment. Among the GDM A2 pregnancies, 26 patients visited or consulted endocrinologists, and 50 patients were managed by obstetricians. There were no significant differences in maternal characteristics and perinatal outcomes between the two groups. Eighteen infants were delivered before 37 weeks of gestation (12 in the obstetrician group and 6 in the endocrinologist group). In preterm-delivered patients, the birth weight was heavier in the endocrinology group (median [range], 2.66 [1.98–3.77] vs. 3.71 [2.48–4.17], p=0.025) despite similar gestational age at delivery (median [range], 35.5 [33.1–36.5] vs. 36.0 [34.2–36.6], p=0.511). However, there were no significant differences in perinatal outcomes, including the rate of neonatal hypoglycemia, oxygen treatment and the duration of neonatal intensive care unit admission. Conclusion: Our data show that GDM can be managed by obstetricians even in cases requiring insulin treatment.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. Agarwal MM, "Gestational diabetes mellitus : confusion among medical doctors caused by multiple international criteria", J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 41, pp.861~869 (2015)
  2. Akinci B, "Management of gestational diabetes by physicians in Turkey", Prim Care Diabetes, 4, pp.173~180 (2010)
  3. American Diabetes Association, "14. Management of diabetes in pregnancy: standards of medical care in diabetes-2019", Diabetes Care, 42(Suppl 1), pp.S165~72 (2019)
  4. Gabbe SG, "Management of diabetes mellitus by obstetrician-gynecologists", Obstet Gynecol, 103, pp.1229~1234 (2004)
  5. "HIRA Bigdata Open portal. National interest disease statistics" (2022)[URL]
  6. 장학철, "새로운 진단기준에 따른 한국인 임신성 당뇨병 임신부의 임신결과", Diabetes and Metabolism Journal, 28(2), pp.122~130 (2004), 대한당뇨병학회
  7. 강희선, "임신중당뇨병 임부의 유병률 및 의료이용 추이", 한국모자보건학회지, 14(2), pp.170~180 (2010), 한국모자보건학회[DOI]
  8. Keshavarz M, "Gestational diabetes in Iran : incidence, risk factors and pregnancy outcomes", Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 69, pp.279~286 (2005)
  9. 김희숙, "당뇨병 임신 발생율 증가에 따른 국가모자보건학적 대책", 한국모자보건학회지, 18(1), pp.118~124 (2014), 한국모자보건학회[DOI]
  10. Kitzmiller JL, "Assessment of costs and benefits of management of gestational diabetes mellitus", Diabetes Care, 21(Suppl 2), pp.B123~30 (1998)
  11. 이경희, "Treatment of gestational diabetes diagnosed by the IADPSG criteria decreases excessive fetal growth", Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 63(1), pp.19~26 (2020), 대한산부인과학회[DOI]
  12. Meloncelli N, "Diagnosis and management practices for gestational diabetes mellitus in Australia : Cross-sectional survey of the multidisciplinary team", Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 59, pp.208~214 (2019)
  13. Minschart C, "Multidisciplinary group education for gestational diabetes mellitus : a prospective observational cohort study", J Clin Med, 9, pp.509~ (2020)
  14. Neuwahl SJ, "Postdelivery intervention to prevent type 2 diabetes and the cost-effectiveness of screening criteria for gestational diabetes", Prev Chronic Dis, 19, pp.E89~ (2022)
  15. Ogunyemi DA, "Attitudes and practices of healthcare providers regarding gestational diabetes : results of a survey conducted at the 2010 meeting of the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group(IADPSG)", Diabet Med, 28, pp.976~986 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

임신성 당뇨 선별 및 진단검사로서의 1단계 검사법과 2단계 검사법에 대한 주산기 예후의 비교김보라, 김영주, 박미혜, 박선화, 이주혜한국모자보건학회 · 한국모자보건학회지2021 · 제25권 제1호Usefulness of Glycated Albumin Levels in Predicting the Maternal or Neonatal Complications of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus during Late Pregnancy in South Korea: A Retrospective StudyKim Jihan, Kim Jong Sung, Lee Sami대한가정의학회 · Korean Journal of Family Medicine2025 · 제46권 제6호임신성 당뇨 A1형과 A2형의 치료 후 임신 결과 및 신생아 예후 비교윤건, 강효정, 곽혜민, 김용석, 김종화, 노정래, 박진선, 오수영, 최석주대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2010 · 제53권 제08호임신성 당뇨병 선별검사 시점 및 HbA1c 농도와 신생아의 예후와의 관계강지민, 김소영, 빈중현, 성인경, 이원배, 이정현, 이현승, 전정식, 최윤정대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2009 · 제29권 제2호Delayed diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus and perinatal outcomes in women with large for gestational age fetuses during the third trimester김병재, 김선민, 김소희, 김태훈, 손지나, 이택상, 임현지, 전혜원, 황규리대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2020 · 제63권 제5호Characteristics of Pregnant Women with Diabetes Mellitus and Their Babies in KoreaDanbi Kim, Juyoung Lee, Kyoung Soon Cho대한신생아학회 · Neonatal medicine2024 · 제31권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)