산림바이오매스에너지에 관한 과학적 근거에 따른 통설적 접근
Forest Biomass Utilization for Energy Based on Scientifically Grounded and Orthodox
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Addressing climate change necessitates evidence-based policies grounded in science. The use of forest biomass forenergy production is based on a broad scientific consensus at the international level. However, some environmental groups in SouthKorea are opposing this system of energy production. Through this study, the authors aim to reduce unnecessary confusion and fosteran atmosphere conducive to meaningful evidence-based policies. We have classified the issue into eight categories: biological carboncycle, carbon debt, nature-based solutions, air emissions, cascading principles and sustainability certification, forest environmentalimpacts, climate change litigation, and the behavior of environmental groups and public perception. Consequently, the following keypoints were derived: (1) the actions of some environmental groups seem to follow a similar pattern to denialist behavior that deniesclimate change and climate science; (2) the quality of evidence for campaigns that oppose the use of forest biomass for energyproduction is low, with a tendency to overgeneralize information, high uncertainty, and difficulty in finding new claims.; (3) most ofthe public believes that forest biomass energy is necessary, and the governments of major countries are aware of its importance. Significantly, Forest biomass for energy is based on an overwhelming level of scientific consensus recognized internationally.
Abstract
Addressing climate change necessitates evidence-based policies grounded in science. The use of forest biomass forenergy production is based on a broad scientific consensus at the international level. However, some environmental groups in SouthKorea are opposing this system of energy production. Through this study, the authors aim to reduce unnecessary confusion and fosteran atmosphere conducive to meaningful evidence-based policies. We have classified the issue into eight categories: biological carboncycle, carbon debt, nature-based solutions, air emissions, cascading principles and sustainability certification, forest environmentalimpacts, climate change litigation, and the behavior of environmental groups and public perception. Consequently, the following keypoints were derived: (1) the actions of some environmental groups seem to follow a similar pattern to denialist behavior that deniesclimate change and climate science; (2) the quality of evidence for campaigns that oppose the use of forest biomass for energyproduction is low, with a tendency to overgeneralize information, high uncertainty, and difficulty in finding new claims.; (3) most ofthe public believes that forest biomass energy is necessary, and the governments of major countries are aware of its importance. Significantly, Forest biomass for energy is based on an overwhelming level of scientific consensus recognized internationally.
참고문헌 (195)
- Morgan, E. A., "Communicating Climate Change Information for Decision-Making", pp.13~28 (2018), Springer
- Grundmann, R., "Climate change and knowledge politics", Env polit, 16(3), pp.414~432 (2007)
- Parkhurst. J., "The politics of evidence: From evidence-based policy to the good governance of evidence" (2016), Routledge
- Han, S. H., "A study on evidencebased policy : Debating points and its applicability to the Korean context", KPAS, 30(1), pp.289~314 (2021)
- Choi, Y. J., "Evidenceinformed policy-making in an uncertain world : Exploratory analysis of interactions between mental models, evidence, and uncertainty", KPAS, 50(2), pp.243~270 (2016)
- "Establishment of the basis of evidencebased policies through analyzing information in science, technology, and innovation" (2021)[URL]
- Berndes, G., "Forest biomass, carbon neutrality and climate change mitigation", Science to policy, 3(7) (2016)[DOI]
- Farrell, J., "Evidencebased strategies to combat scientific misinformation", Nat. Clim. Change, 9(3), pp.191~195 (2019)
- Diethelm, P., "Denialism : What is it and how should scientists respond?", European Journal of Public Health, 19(1), pp.2~4 (2009)
- Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty, "Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change", Cambridge University Press, ~ (2018)
- "Net zero roadmap: A global pathway to keep the 1.5°C goal in reach" (2023)[URL]
- "European Union: Wood pellets annual" (2023)[URL]
- "UK Wood production and trade: Provisional figures" (2023)[URL]
- "Statistical report 2023: Pellets" (2023)[URL]
- "Bioenergy call for evidence report and associated responses - report for Committee on Climate Change (CCC)" (2018)[URL]
- Cowie, A. L., "Applying a science-based systems perspective to dispel misconceptions about climate effects of forest bioenergy", Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy, 13(8), pp.1210~1231 (2021)
- "From oil security to steering the world toward secure and sustainable energy transitions" (2023)[URL]
- "International Energy Agency and improving oil market crisis response capabilities" (2004)[URL]
- "Written evidence (Sustainable timber and deforestation)" (2023)[URL]
- "Biomass carbon accounting is no longer fit for purpose and must be fixed, demand biomass campaigners at Bonn climate conference" (2023)[URL]
- "Greenhouse gas balance of bioenergy systems - Standard methodology schematic structure" (2002)[URL]
- Chapter 6 - Carbon and other biogeochemical cycles, In: Climate change 2013: The physical science basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, "Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change", Cambridge University Press, ~ (2013)
- "Fossil vs biogenic CO2 emissions" (2023)[URL]
- "The carbon cycle" (2011)[URL]
- "Forests and the climate - Manage for maximum wood production or leave the forest as a carbon sink?" (2018)[URL]
- Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report, Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the 5th Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, "Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change", IPCC, 151~ (2014)
- "Why use biomass?" (2023)[URL]
- "Accounting whole life cycle bioenergy emissions within the UNFCCC emission accounting framework" (2020)[URL]
- Report of IPCC scoping meeting for a methodology report(s) to refine the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, "Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change", IPCC, ~ (2016)
- "2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories" (2023)[URL]
- "Calculation tools - specific accounting questions" (2023)[URL]
- Kline, K. L., "Challenges for bioenergy emission accounting", Bioenergy Knowledge Discovery Framework Science e-letter, ~ (2009)
- Pingoud, K., "Bioenergy : counting on incentives", Science, 327(5970), pp.1199~1200 (2010)
- "Biomass plant CO2emissions - an explanation" (2022)[URL]
- "The use of forest biomass for climate change mitigation: dispelling some misconceptions" (2020)[URL]
- A study on the feasibility of a low-carbon clean fuel conversion Project, "ECO & PARTNERS", Korea Ministry of Environment, 98~ (2021)
- Development of a methodology for evaluating the entire process by conversion method for extending the carbon storage period of wood products, "Konkuk University", Korea Forest Service, 123~132 (2019)
- "Bioenergy, land use change and climate change mitigation Background Technical Report" (2011)[URL]
- "EPA’s treatment of biogenic carbon dioxide(CO2)emissions from stationary sources that use forest biomass for energy production" (2018)[URL]
- "Biomass explained (Biomass and the environment)" (2022)[URL]
- "2050 LEDS (Carbon neutral strategy of the Republic of Korea towards a sustainable and green society)" (2020)[URL]
- "National strategy for carbon neutral and green growth and the first national basic plan" (2023)[URL]
- "Japan’s green growth strategy to achieve carbon neutrality in 2050" (2022)[URL]
- "Result of the public solicitation of opinions on the third interim report (Draft) of the biomass sustainability working group, new energy subcommittee, energy conservation and new energy subcommittee, advisory committee for natural resources and energy" (2023)[URL]
- "Seeing the wood for the trees: the contribution of the forestry and timber sectors to biodiversity and net zero goals" (2023)[URL]
- "Biomass strategy 2023" (2023)[URL]
- "Mitigating climate change. Creating value. Utilising resources efficiently (The charter for wood 2.0)" (2021)[URL]
- "Klimaschutz, wald und nutzung von holz" (2019)[URL]
- "Bioenergy" (2023)[URL]
- "About wood pellet" (2023)[URL]
- "How UNFCCC carbon accounting has created a biomass delusion and is contributing to climate change and global inequity" (2023)[URL]
- Norton, M., "Serious mismatches continue between science and policy in forest bioenergy", Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy, 11(11), pp.1256~1263 (2019)
- Sterman, J., "Does wood bioenergy help or harm the climate?", Bull. At. Sci, 78(3), pp.128~138 (2022)
- Booth, M. S., "Not carbon neutral : Assessing the net emissions impact of residues burned for bioenergy", Environ. Res. Lett, 13(3), pp.035001~ (2018)
- Schlesinger, W. H., "Are wood pellets a green fuel?", Science, 359(6382), pp.1328~1329 (2018)
- Cherubini, F., "Global climate impacts of forest bioenergy : what, when and how to measure?", Environ. Res. Lett, 8(1), pp.014049~ (2013)
- Bernier, P., "Using ecosystem CO2measurements to estimate the timing and magnitude of greenhouse gas mitigation potential of forest bioenergy", Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy, 5(1), pp.67~72 (2013)
- Peng, L., "The carbon costs of global wood harvests", Nature, 620, pp.110~115 (2023)
- Ranius, T., "The effects of logging residue extraction for energy on ecosystem services and biodiversity : A synthesis", J. Environ. Manage, 209, pp.409~425 (2018)
- Schulze, E. D., "Response to the letters by Kun et al. and Booth et al", Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy, 12(12), pp.1038~1042 (2020)
- "The forest carbon debt illusion" (2021)[URL]
- Choi, S. H., "A mathematical programming method for minimization of carbon debt of bioenergy", Clean Technology, 27(3), pp.269~274 (2021)
- "Written response to the environmental audit committee inquiry on sustainable timber and deforestation" (2023)[URL]
- Sustainability of biomass for co-firing, "Adams, D.", IEA Clean Coal Center, 43~58 (2013)
- Malmsheimer, R. W., "Managing forests because carbon matters: Integrating energy, products, and land management policy", J. For, 109(7S), pp.S7~S50 (2011)
- "Forest carbon primer" (2020)[URL]
- "Plain language summary - Range and uncertainties in estimating delays in greenhouse gas mitigation potential of forest bioenergy sourced from Canadian forests" (2020)[URL]
- Ter-Mikaelian, M. T., "The burning question : Does forest bioenergy reduce carbon emissions? A review of common misconceptions about forest carbon accounting", J. For, 113(1), pp.57~68 (2015)
- Miner, R. A., "Forest carbon accounting considerations in US bioenergy policy", J. For, 112(6), pp.591~606 (2014)
- "Forest management and market responses" (2023)[URL]
- Burschel, P., "Present role of German forests and forestry in the national carbon budget and options to its increase", Water Air Soil Pollut, 70, pp.325~340 (1993)
- McKechnie, J., "Forest bioenergy or forest carbon? Assessing trade-offs in greenhouse gas mitigation with wood-based fuels", Environ. Sci. Technol, 45(2), pp.789~795 (2011)
- "Climate Change 2007: Working Group III:Mitigation of Climate Change (Figure 9.3)" (2007)[URL]
- "Carbon balance from a hypothetical forest management project (Figure TS.6), Climate Change 2001:Mitigation – Technical Summary (A Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)" (2001)[URL]
- McKinley, D. C., "A synthesis of current knowledge on forests and carbon storage in the United States", Ecol. Appl, 21(6), pp.1902~1924 (2011)
- "Biomass sustainability working group, 1st interim report" (2019)[URL]
- "Forest bioenergy 101: Generation and emissions" (2020)[URL]
- Martin-Gamboa, M., "Life cycle assessment of biomass pellets : A review of methodological choices and results", Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev, 133, pp.110278~ (2020)
- "Forest bioenergy" (2020)[URL]
- "Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from electricity generation: Update -NREL fact sheet" (2021)[URL]
- An analysis of current bioenergy life cycle assessment methodology, "Kim, G.", ~, pp.GTC BRIEF 3(11) (2022)
- Hong, S. H., "Problems of forest management from a carbon neutral perspective and nature based solutions", Environmental Law and Policy, 29, pp.21~48 (2022)
- Wendling, L., "Editorial : Introduction to the Nature-Based Solutions journal", NbS, 1, pp.100003~ (2021)
- Lee, S. H., "Cases and implications of response to climate crisis using ecosystembased adaptation(EbA)approach", Environmental Law and Policy, 29, pp.1~20 (2022)
- Nature-based solution research trends and forest, "Choi, E. H.", Korea National Institute of Forest Science, ~ (2023)
- Seddon, N., "Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges", Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 375(1794), pp.20190120~ (2020)
- Using nature-based Solutions in the forestry sector to respond to climate change, "Choi, E. H.", Korea National Institute of Forest Science, ~ (2022)
- Paris Agreement, "Ministry of Government Legislation", ~, pp.Multilateral Treaty No.2315 (2016)
- Considering forest and grassland carbon in land management, "Janowiak, M.", United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, ~ (2017)
- "Opportunities for accelerating Nature-based Solutions: A roadmap for climate progress, thriving nature, equity, and prosperity. report to the national climate task force" (2022)[URL]
- Ter-Mikaelian, M. T., "Fact and fantasy about forest carbon", For. Chron, 84(2), pp.166~171 (2008)
- "Written evidence submitted by Cut Carbon Not Forests (CCNF) DEF0013" (2023)[URL]
- "Boiler application process" (2023)[URL]
- "Burn wise" (2023)[URL]
- Lee, S. R., "A comparative study on the quality standards of wood pellet products and small-scale wood pellet boiler equipment in domestic and foreign", J. Agr. Sci. Chungbuk Nat’l Univ, 38(2), pp.154~161 (2022)
- "Emissions" (2023)[URL]
- "How bioenergy contributes to a sustainable future" (2023)[URL]
- Lee, S. R., "Reducing particulates and gaseous emissions through fuel switching from coal to wood pellets at power plants in South Korea during 2005 to 2022", BioRes, 18(4), pp.8458~8472 (2023)
- "Emissions of air pollutants in the UK" (2023)[URL]
- Tomlin, A. S., "Air quality and climate impacts of biomass use as an energy source : A review", Energy Fuels, 35(18), pp.14213~14240 (2021)
- Khan, A. A., "Biomass combustion in fluidized bed boilers : Potential problems and remedies", Fuel Process. Technol, 90(1), pp.21~50 (2009)
- "Biopower: Background and federal support" (2016)[URL]
- "Powering up britain: Energy security plan" (2023)[URL]
- "Macron to convert France’s remaining coal-fired power plants to biomass" (2023)[URL]
- "Progress in reducing UK emissions 2023 report to parliament" (2023)[URL]
- "Forest Renaissance Strategy ('22-27)" (2023)[URL]
- Lee, S. R., "S. Korea’s approach strategy through policy analysis of major countries to promote the use of forest biomass as renewable energy", New. Renew. Energy, 18(3), pp.10~22 (2022)
- Mather-Gratton, Z. J., "Understanding the sustainability debate on forest biomass for energy in Europe: A discourse analysis", PLoS ONE, 16(2), pp.e0246873~ (2021)
- A study on the measure of the construction for trade mechanism and market activation of eco-friendly distributed energy based on digital platform, "Lee, Y. S.", Korea Energy Economic Institute, ~ (2021)
- Ryu, S. H., "An analysis of residents’perception on district heating in the village unit using forest biomass-Focused on the case of forest carbon circulation village in Hwacheon", Journal of Environmental Science International, 29(4), pp.339~349 (2020)
- "NGOs: To protect nature and the climate, we must reform how bioenergy is treated in the EU’s renewable energy directive" (2021)[URL]
- Olsson, O., "Time to tear down the pyramids? A critique of cascading hierarchies as a policy tool", WIREs Energy Environ, 7(2), pp.e279~ (2018)
- Global forest resources assessment 2020 -Key findings, "UN FAO", ~ (2020)
- Malmsheimer, R. W., "Forest management solutions for mitigating climate change in the United States", Journal of Forestry, 106(3), pp.115~173 (2008)
- "Cascading of woody biomass:definitions, policies and effects on international trade" (2016)[URL]
- "Cascading of woody biomass: The tricky path from principle to policy to practice" (2017)[URL]
- Directive (EU) 2023, "2413 of the European parliament and of the council of 18 October 2023 amending Directive (EU) 2018", 2001, pp.2023, ~
- "State aid: Commission authorises UK support to convert unit of Drax power plant from coal to biomass" (2016)[URL]
- "Voluntary schemes" (2023)[URL]
- "Burning up the carbon sink: How the EU’s forest biomass policy undermines climate mitigation, and how it can be reformed" (2022)[URL]
- "Approaches to sustainability compliance and verification for forest biomass" (2023)[URL]
- Lee, S. R., "UK case study for sustainable forest biomass policy development of South Korea", New. Renew. Energy, 17(1), pp.50~60 (2021)
- "Biomass sustainability working group, 2nd interim report" (2022)[URL]
- "Biomass sustainability working group, 3rd interim report" (2023)[URL]
- Risk management and decision making in relation to sustainable development, In: climate change and land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems, "Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change", Cambridge University, 708~ (2019)
- "Environmental implications of increased reliance of the EU on biomass from the South East US : final report" (2016)[URL]
- "Ability of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage to generate negative emissions" (2023)[URL]
- Galik, C. S., "Sustainability guidelines and forest market response : an assessment of European Union pellet demand in the southeastern United States", Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy, 8(3), pp.658~669 (2016)
- Aguilar, F. X., "Expansion of US wood pellet industry points to positive trends but the need for continued monitoring", Scientific Reports, 10(1), pp.18607~ (2020)
- Dale, V. H., "How is wood-based pellet production affecting forest conditions in the southeastern United States?", For. Ecol. Manag, 396, pp.143~149 (2017)
- Petrokofsky, G., "What are the impacts of the wood pellet industry on biodiversity in Southeastern USA? A systematic evidence synthesis", For. Ecol. Manag, 483, pp.118773~ (2021)
- Lippke, B., "Life cycle impacts of forest management and wood utilization on carbon mitigation : Knowns and unknowns", Carbon Management, 2(3), pp.303~333 (2011)
- Harrison, R. B., "Deep soil horizons : contribution and importance to soil carbon pools and in assessing whole-ecosystem response to management and global change", Forest Science, 57(1), pp.67~76 (2011)
- "A sustainable bioenergy policy for the period after 2020: Stakeholder conference - Brussels, Belgium" (2016)[URL]
- "Spreading like wildfire - The rising threat of extraordinary landscape fires" (2022)[URL]
- "Republic of Estonia" (2022)[URL]
- "2023 Country report - Estonia" (2023)[URL]
- "Forest forestry statics platform - Forest area and forest growing stock by year" (2023)[URL]
- "Wood supply and demand statics" (2023)[URL]
- "Unused forest biomass statics" (2023)[URL]
- Lee, S. R., "Mid-and long-term forecast of forest biomass energy in South Korea, and analysis of the alternative effects of fossil fuel", New. Renew. Energy, 18(3), pp.1~9 (2022)
- "Removals decreased to 75 million cubic metres in 2022" (2023)[URL]
- "Wood in energy generation 2022 (provisional)" (2023)[URL]
- "Report on bioenergy sustainability under regulation EU/2018/1999" (2023)[URL]
- "Korean solar industry makes unprecedented legal challenge to “green” credentials of biomass energy" (2020)[URL]
- "Liability for climate change impacts: the role of climate attribution science, Corporate responsibility and liability in relation to climate change (Intersentia 2022)" (2022)[URL]
- "Coöperatie mobilisation for the environment U.A and others v. executive board of province of North Holland (Vattenfall power generations Netherlands BV intervening)" (2021)[URL]
- "EU biomass plaintiffs v. European Union" (2019)[URL]
- "In the Matter of the Application of Hawaii Electric Light Company, INC. - For approval of a Power Purchase Agreement for renewable dispatchable firm energy and capacity" (2023)[URL]
- "Campaigns questioning the use of woody biomass for energy are missing key facts" (2021)[URL]
- "Facts, not fiction: Bioenergy from wood contributes to Europe’s energy security and is part of a sustainable energy mix" (2022)[URL]
- "Facts, not fiction: Bioenergy from wood contributes to Europe’s energy security and is part of a sustainable energy mix" (2022)[URL]
- Norton, M., "Serious mismatches continue between science and policy in forest bioenergy", Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy, 11(11), pp.1256~1263 (2019)
- "The use of forest biomass for climate change mitigation: response to statements by EASAC" (2019)[URL]
- "EASAC’s correspondence with the President of the European Commission on the role of biomass energy" (2018)[URL]
- "Woody biomass for power and heatimpacts on the global climate" (2017)[URL]
- "IEA Bioenergy response to Chatham House report - Woody biomass for power and heat: Impacts on the global climate" (2017)[URL]
- "Carbon neutral? Think again" (2011)[URL]
- "UK Renewables Obligation: Last chance to stop subsidies for destructive biomass and biofuel electricity(2011)" (2011)[URL]
- "Can biomass qualify as renewable energy? - The state of biomass policy in South Korea" (2019)[URL]
- "Big green lies" (2011)[URL]
- "Carbon emissions from burning biomass for energy" (2011)[URL]
- "Burning wood in power stationspublic health impacts" (2014)[URL]
- "Trees, trash, and toxics: How biomass energy has become the new coal" (2014)[URL]
- "Sustainable biomass: A modern myth - A review of standards, criteria and schemes certifying industrial biomass as ‘sustainable’, with particular emphasis on UK biomass electricity developments" (2012)[URL]
- "Foxes guarding the henhouse;why “self-certification” in the biomass industry threatens our forests" (2013)[URL]
- "Forests, ecological and bioenergy -Joint policy proposal for the 20th presidential election" (2022)[URL]
- "50 NGOs call for a science-based EU sustainable taxonomy" (2019)[URL]
- "No over exploitation of forests for a wrong energy turn around" (2020)[URL]
- "Establishing a sound framework for bioenergy in clean energy and climate protection legislation" (2010)[URL]
- "S.Korea forest policy is subsidizing forest cutting and accelerating climate change" (2021)[URL]
- Mongabay, "500+ experts call on world’s nations to not burn forests to make energy", ~ (2021)
- "Local and international scientists submit bioenergy statements to U.S., South Korea, and European leaders" (2021)[URL]
- "EU Renewable energy policy devastates forests and accelerates climate change, new lawsuit claims" (2019)[URL]
- Hankyoreh, "‘Biomass’ environmental issues will be cleared up by the Constitutional Court?", ~ (2020)
- "Administrative litigation to biomass subsidies policy more than solar" (2021)[URL]
- BBC, "Drax: The green energy scandal exposed", ~ (2022)
- Korea Broad casting System, "The truth of the mountain with no trees: Only we didn’t know", ~ (2021)
- CNN, "How marginalized communities in the South are paying the price for ‘green energy’ in Europe", ~ (2021)
- "Importing deforestation: Forest-risk commodity supply chains and due diligence legislation in South Korea" (2022)[URL]
- "Wood pellets and environmental justice communities" (2023)[URL]
- "Quick facts report: The Dogwood Alliance" (2019)[URL]
- Kim, S. T., "New functions of Internet mediated agenda-setting : Agenda-rippling and reversed agenda-setting", Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 50(3), pp.175~204 (2006)
- Zilberman, D., "Indirect land use change: much ado about (almost) nothing", Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy, 9(3), pp.485~488 (2017)
- Euractiv, "NGOs walk out of EU green finance group, citing political interference", ~ (2022)
- "Anti-humanist environmentalism and the foundation for the carolinas" (2019)[URL]
- "Forest concerns in the United States:Then and now" (2010)[URL]
- "The environmental movement: good cops and bad cops" (2010)[URL]
- "Release: the nature conservancy exposed for promoting industrial logging and wood products" (2022)[URL]
- Mendell, B. C., "Learning from mistakes in the media to improve the communication of wood bioenergy research", BioRes, 9(1), pp.1~3 (2014)
- Treen, K., "Online misinformation about climate change", Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 11(5), pp.e665~ (2020)
- Lewandowsky, S., "Climate change disinformation and how to combat it", Annual Review of Public Health, 42, pp.1~21 (2021)
- "Wie schaut die deutsche Gesellschaft derzeit auf die Klimabewegung?" (2023)[URL]
- "Role of biomass in achieving net zero: public dialogue" (2023)[URL]
- "2023 National Survey on Forests" (2023)[URL]
