본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

유양돌기 방사선검사 시 조사야 사용법에 따른 영상의 유용성 평가

Evaluation of the Usefulness of Images according to the Use of the Field Size in Mastoid Process Radiography

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류방사선과학

초록

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of images and to quantitatively measure and analyze the dose of scattered ray to the organs, which were highly sensitive to radiation according to the use of cylinder cone in mastoid process radiography. When the cylinder cone was not used, the SID was 100cm and the field size was 24 × 36 cm(864 ㎠). When using the cylinder cone which was a circle, the SID was 70 cm, the radius was 10.5 cm and field size was 86.59 ㎠. As a result of the study, SNR of the image quality evaluation was measured to be 2.58 for Law method and 3.90 for Stenver’s method when not using cylinder cone, and 2.87 for Law method and 14.67 for Stenver’s method when using cylinder cone. CNR was measured to be 0.03 for Law method and 0.04 for Stenver’s method when cylinder cone was not used, and 0.04 for Law method and 0.05 for Stenver’s method when using cylinder cone. When the cylinder cone was not used, the scattered ray dose was measured to be 0.10 mGy in the right eyeball, 0.30 mGy in the left eyeball, 2.02 mGy in the parotid gland, and 0.29 mGy in the thyroid gland for Law method and to be 0.03 mGy in the right eyeball, 0.12 mGy in the left eyeball, 1.43 mGy in the parotid gland, and 0.09 mGy in the thyroid gland for Stenver’s method. When the cylinder cone was used, the scattered ray dose was measured to be 0.05 mGy in the right eyeball, 0.03 mGy in the left eyeball and the parotid and thyroid gland were below the measurable values for Law method and all areas were below the measurable values for Stenver’s method. This was found to be statistically significant( p<0.000).

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of images and to quantitatively measure and analyze the dose of scattered ray to the organs, which were highly sensitive to radiation according to the use of cylinder cone in mastoid process radiography. When the cylinder cone was not used, the SID was 100cm and the field size was 24 × 36 cm(864 ㎠). When using the cylinder cone which was a circle, the SID was 70 cm, the radius was 10.5 cm and field size was 86.59 ㎠. As a result of the study, SNR of the image quality evaluation was measured to be 2.58 for Law method and 3.90 for Stenver’s method when not using cylinder cone, and 2.87 for Law method and 14.67 for Stenver’s method when using cylinder cone. CNR was measured to be 0.03 for Law method and 0.04 for Stenver’s method when cylinder cone was not used, and 0.04 for Law method and 0.05 for Stenver’s method when using cylinder cone. When the cylinder cone was not used, the scattered ray dose was measured to be 0.10 mGy in the right eyeball, 0.30 mGy in the left eyeball, 2.02 mGy in the parotid gland, and 0.29 mGy in the thyroid gland for Law method and to be 0.03 mGy in the right eyeball, 0.12 mGy in the left eyeball, 1.43 mGy in the parotid gland, and 0.09 mGy in the thyroid gland for Stenver’s method. When the cylinder cone was used, the scattered ray dose was measured to be 0.05 mGy in the right eyeball, 0.03 mGy in the left eyeball and the parotid and thyroid gland were below the measurable values for Law method and all areas were below the measurable values for Stenver’s method. This was found to be statistically significant( p<0.000).

참고문헌 (15)

  1. Healthcare Bigdate Hub, "Health Review & Assessment Service all nights reserve", ~ (2018)
  2. 황수련, "일차 의료기관에서 일반촬영 검사의 피폭선량 연구", 한국방사선학회논문지, 5(5), pp.245~253 (2011), 한국방사선학회
  3. The Korean Association for Radiation Protection, "The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 103", ~ (2007)
  4. Kim JM, "Radiological Imaging Informatics" (2017), Sin Kwang
  5. 안성민, "치과구내용 X선발생기의 조사통 직경 변화에 따른 선량변화", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 10(3), pp.266~270 (2010), 한국콘텐츠학회
  6. Kang IS, "Development and Usefulness Evaluation of IRIS type Collimator for Diagnostic Radiation Generator", Department of Health Care the, pp.2018
  7. 김기원, "흉추 측면검사 영상의 CNR과 SNR 측정의 비교 연구", 방사선기술과학, 36(4), pp.273~280 (2013), 대한방사선과학회
  8. Ministry of Health and Welfare, "Diagnostic Reference Level guidelines-General radiography", ~ (2019)
  9. Kwon DM, "Analog & Digital Medical Imaging Informatics" (2001), Dalhaks
  10. The Korea Society of Medical Imaging Technology, "Textbook of radiographic positioning and clinical diagnosis" (2020), Chung-Gu Publisher
  11. 김종석, "흉부 전・후방향 검사 시 고관전압 및 산란선 후처리 소프트웨어 적용이 화질과 선량에 미치는 영향", 방사선기술과학, 44(4), pp.295~300 (2021), 대한방사선과학회
  12. 최성관, "X선 촬영에서 조사야 크기에 따른 산란선량의 변화", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 13(3), pp.198~203 (2013), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  13. Jeon IK, "Development and Usability Evaluation of Trapezoidal Cone in Diagnostic Radiation Generators", Department of Radiological Science, pp.2020
  14. 강인석, "조리개형 X선 콜리메이터의 개발에 따른 유용성 평가", 방사선기술과학, 41(3), pp.249~254 (2018), 대한방사선과학회[DOI]
  15. 김기원, "복부팬텀을 이용한 SID 변화와 부가필터 유무에 따른 피폭선량에 관한 연구", 방사선기술과학, 39(3), pp.407~414 (2016), 대한방사선과학회[DOI]

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)