본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

다양한 수치해석 모델과 지진 주파수 성분을 고려한 원전구조물의 지진 응답 평가

Seismic Response Evaluation of NPP Structures Considering Different Numerical Models and Frequency Contents of Earthquakes

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

본 연구의 목적은 원자로 1400(APR 1400) 원자력 발전소(NPP)의 원자로 격납건물(RCB) 내진성능에 대해 상이한 수치모델과 지진 주파수 성분의 영향을 평가하는 것이다. 집중 질량 막대 모델(lumped-mass stick model, LMSM)과 3차원 유한요소모델(three- dimensional finite element model, 3D FEM)의 두 가지 수치 모델이 시간이력해석을 수행하기 위해 개발되었다. LMSM은 기존의 집중 질량 보-요소를 사용하여 SAP2000으로 구성하였으며, 3D FEM은 각기둥 입체-요소를 사용하여 ANSYS로 작성되었다. 저주파수 및 고주파수 성분을 고려한 두 그룹의 지진파를 시간이력해석에 적용하였다. 저주파수 지진파의 응답스펙트럼을 NRC 1.60의 설계 스펙트럼과 일치되도록 조정하여 작성하였으며, 고주파수 지진파는 10Hz ~ 100Hz의 고주파수 범위를 갖도록 생성하였다. RCB의 지진응답은 다양한 높이에서 층응답스펙트럼으로 검토하였다. 수치해석 결과, 저주파수 지진에 의한 구조물의 FRS 결과는 두 수치 모델에서 매우 유사한 결과를 보였다. 하지만, 고주파수 지진에 의한 LMSM의 FRS 결과는 고차 고유 주파수 영역에서 3D FEM과 큰 차이를 보였으며, RCB의 낮은 높이에서 명확한 차이를 보였다. 3D FEM이 정확한 구조물의 응답을 나타내는 것으로 가정한다면, RCB의 LMSM은 고주파수 지진에 의한 FRS 결과의 고차 고유 주파수 영역에서 일정 수준의 불일치성을 내포하고 있다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of the application of various numerical models and frequency contents of earthquakes on the performances of the reactor containment building (RCB) in a nuclear power plant (NPP) equipped with an advanced power reactor 1400 . Two kinds of numerical models are developed to perform time-history analyses: a lumped-mass stick model (LMSM) and a full three-dimensional finite element model (3D FEM). The LMSM is constructed in SAP2000 using conventional beam elements with concentrated masses, whereas the 3D FEM is built in ANSYS using solid elements. Two groups of ground motions considering low- and high-frequency contents are applied in time-history analyses. The low-frequency motions are created by matching their response spectra with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1.60 design spectrum, whereas the high-frequency motions are artificially generated with a high-frequency range from 10Hz to 100Hz. Seismic responses are measured in terms of floor response spectra (FRS) at the various elevations of the RCB. The numerical results show that the FRS of the structure under low-frequency motions for two numerical models are highly matched. However, under high-frequency motions, the FRS obtained by the LMSM at a high natural frequency range are significantly different from those of the 3D FEM, and the largest difference is found at the lower elevation of the RCB. By assuming that the 3D FEM approximates responses of the structure accurately, it can be concluded that the LMSM produces a moderate discrepancy at the high-frequency range of the FRS of the RCB.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. Ahmed, K., "Effect of the Incoherent Earthquake Motion on Responses of Seismically Isolated Nuclear Power Plant Structure", Earthq. & Struct, 14(1), pp.33~44 (2018)
  2. In-KilChoi, "Reevaluation of Seismic Fragility Parameters of Nuclear Power Plant Components Considering Uniform Hazard Spectrum", Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 34(6), pp.586~595 (2002), 한국원자력학회
  3. In-Kil Choi, "Seismic Fragility Analysis of a CANDU Type NPP Containment Building for Near-fault Ground Motions", KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 10(2), pp.105~112 (2006), 대한토목학회
  4. Choi, I. K., "Probabilistic Seismic Risk Analysis of CANDU Containment Structure for Near-fault Earthquakes", Nucl. Eng. & Des, 238(6), pp.1382~1391 (2008)
  5. Choi, I.K., "Consideration of High Frequency Ground Motion Effects on the Seismic Fragility of NPP Components", Internal Symposium on Seismic Evaluation of Existing Nuclear Facilities (2003)
  6. 전영선, "Effects of Mechanical Property Variability in Lead Rubber Bearings on the Response of Seismic Isolation System for Different Ground Motions", Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 46(5), pp.605~618 (2014), 한국원자력학회
  7. Elkhoraibi, T., "Effect of High Frequency Seismic Excitation on Standard Plant Design", 3rd Conference on Technological Innovations in Nuclear Civil Engineering (TINCE) (2016)
  8. High Frequency Program: High Frequency Testing Summary, "EPRI", Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), ~, pp.Technical Report 3002002997 (2014)
  9. Advanced Nuclear Technology: High-Frequency Seismic Loading Evaluation For Standard Nuclear Power Plants, "EPRI", Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), ~, pp.Technical Report 3002009429 (2017)
  10. 임승현, "포항지진에 대한 원자력발전소 구조물 및 기기의 지진응답분석", 한국지진공학회논문집, 22(3), pp.113~119 (2018), 한국지진공학회[DOI]
  11. Ghiocel, D.M., "Seismic SSI Response of Reactor Building Structures", OECD NEA Seismic SSI Workshop (2010)
  12. Joe, Y.H., "Seismic Fragility Analyses of Nuclear Power Plant Structures based on the Recorded Earthquake Data in Korea", Transactions of the 17th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT-17) (2003)
  13. Jung, J. W., "Effect of Second Hardening on Floor Response Spectrum of a Base-Isolated Nuclear Power Plant", Nucl. Eng. & Des, 322, pp.138~147 (2017)
  14. 정재욱, "면진원전의 층응답스펙트럼 해석", 한국전산구조공학회논문집, 29(4), pp.355~362 (2016), 한국전산구조공학회[DOI]
  15. 곽신영, "동흡진기 적용을 통한 원전기기의 내진성능향상에 관한 수치적 연구", 한국전산구조공학회논문집, 32(1), pp.17~28 (2019), 한국전산구조공학회[DOI]
  16. 김광전, "면진된 원자력발전소 구조물의 경주지진 응답평가", 한국지진공학회논문집, 20(7), pp.453~460 (2016), 한국지진공학회
  17. Development and Verification of Simplified Beam-Stick Model of Seismically Isolated ARP1400 Nuclear Power Plant Structure, "Kim, J.M.", Central Research Institute of KHNP, ~, pp.KETEP Project No. 2014151010170B (2015)
  18. 이은행, "Evaluation of the Soil-structure Interaction Effect on Seismically Isolated Nuclear Power Plant Structures", 한국지진공학회논문집, 20(6), pp.379~389 (2016), 한국지진공학회
  19. 송종걸, "등가선형 및 비선형 납-고무받침 모델을 이용한 면진된 원전구조물의 지진응답의 비교", 한국지진공학회논문집, 19(1), pp.1~11 (2015), 한국지진공학회
  20. Moreschi, L.M., "Generation of In-Structure Response Spectra for Nuclear Power Plants Subjected to High-Frequency Ground Motion", 20th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (2012)
  21. Nguyen Duy-Duan, "근거리지진의 영향을 고려한 면진 원전구조물의 지진취약도", 한국방재학회논문집, 18(7), pp.315~321 (2018), 한국방재학회[DOI]
  22. 두이두안 응웬, "지진의 지속시간이 면진원전의 지진거동에 미치는 영향", 한국지진공학회논문집, 23(3), pp.149~157 (2019), 한국지진공학회[DOI]
  23. Nguyen, D.D., "Effects of Mechanical Properties of LRB on Seismic Performance of Base-Isolated NPP Structures", Transaction of the 25th Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT-25) Conference (2019)
  24. Duy-Duan Nguyen, "Identifying signifi cant earthquake intensity measures for evaluating seismic damage and fragility of nuclear power plant structures", Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 52(1), pp.192~205 (2020), 한국원자력학회
  25. Regulatory Guide 1.60: Design Response Spectra for Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants, "NRC", US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ~ (1973)
  26. Pan, Q., "Effects of High Frequency Ground Motion on the Local Seismic Responses of Safety-Related Nuclear Structures", Transactions of the 22nd International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT-22) (2013)
  27. 박효상, "고주파 지진이 원자력 발전소 설비의 동적거동에 미치는 영향", 한국방재학회논문집, 17(6), pp.285~294 (2017), 한국방재학회[DOI]
  28. Rydell, C., "Seismic High-Frequency Content Loads on Structures and Components within Nuclear Facilities", pp.2014
  29. RspMatch, "Earthquake Generation using Time Domain Method", Kunsan National University, ~ (2014)
  30. "A Computer Program for Signal Processing of Strong-Motion Data" (2017)[URL]
  31. Tran, T. T., "Seismic Incidence on Base-Isolated Nuclear Power Plants considering Uni-And Bi-Directional Ground Motions", J. Struct. Integr. & Maint, 3(2), pp.86~94 (2018)
  32. Uwizerimana, S., "Structural Modeling and Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Power Plant Structures", Master, pp.2015
  33. Xie, W. C, "Seismic Risk Analysis of Nuclear Power Plants" (2019), Cambridge University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)