본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일반엑스선검사 교육용 시뮬레이터 개발을 위한 기계학습 분류모델 비교

Comparison of Machine Learning Classification Models for the Development of Simulators for General X-ray Examination Education

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류방사선과학

초록

In this study, the applicability of machine learning for the development of a simulator for general X-ray examination education is evaluated. To this end, k-nearest neighbor(kNN), support vector machine(SVM) and neural network( NN) classification models are analyzed to present the most suitable model by analyzing the results. Image data was obtained by taking 100 photos each corresponding to Posterior anterior(PA), Posterior anterior oblique(Obl), Lateral(Lat), Fan lateral(Fan lat). 70% of the acquired 400 image data were used as training sets for learning machine learning models and 30% were used as test sets for evaluation. and prediction model was constructed for right-handed PA, Obl, Lat, Fan lat image classification. Based on the data set, after constructing the classification model using the kNN, SVM, and NN models, each model was compared through an error matrix. As a result of the evaluation, the accuracy of kNN was 0.967 area under curve(AUC) was 0.993, and the accuracy of SVM was 0.992 AUC was 1.000. The accuracy of NN was 0.992 and AUC was 0.999, which was slightly lower in kNN, but all three models recorded high accuracy and AUC. In this study, right-handed PA, Obl, Lat, Fan lat images were classified and predicted using the machine learning classification models, kNN, SVM, and NN models. The prediction showed that SVM and NN were the same at 0.992, and AUC was similar at 1.000 and 0.999, indicating that both models showed high predictive power and were applicable to educational simulators.

Abstract

In this study, the applicability of machine learning for the development of a simulator for general X-ray examination education is evaluated. To this end, k-nearest neighbor(kNN), support vector machine(SVM) and neural network( NN) classification models are analyzed to present the most suitable model by analyzing the results. Image data was obtained by taking 100 photos each corresponding to Posterior anterior(PA), Posterior anterior oblique(Obl), Lateral(Lat), Fan lateral(Fan lat). 70% of the acquired 400 image data were used as training sets for learning machine learning models and 30% were used as test sets for evaluation. and prediction model was constructed for right-handed PA, Obl, Lat, Fan lat image classification. Based on the data set, after constructing the classification model using the kNN, SVM, and NN models, each model was compared through an error matrix. As a result of the evaluation, the accuracy of kNN was 0.967 area under curve(AUC) was 0.993, and the accuracy of SVM was 0.992 AUC was 1.000. The accuracy of NN was 0.992 and AUC was 0.999, which was slightly lower in kNN, but all three models recorded high accuracy and AUC. In this study, right-handed PA, Obl, Lat, Fan lat images were classified and predicted using the machine learning classification models, kNN, SVM, and NN models. The prediction showed that SVM and NN were the same at 0.992, and AUC was similar at 1.000 and 0.999, indicating that both models showed high predictive power and were applicable to educational simulators.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. Assessment of radiation exposure of Korean population by medical radiation, "KDCA", Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, ~ (2020)
  2. 전성민, "방사선(학)과의 작업종사자와 수시출입자의 교내 실습에 따른 피폭선량에 대한 고찰", 한국방사선학회논문지, 15(3), pp.355~359 (2021), 한국방사선학회[DOI]
  3. 강세식, "방사선학과 교육과정 개선을 위한 현 교육과정 평가", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 11(5), pp.242~251 (2011), 한국콘텐츠학회
  4. 길종원, "방사선(학)과 실습교육에서 X선 피폭 감소를 위한 운영방법에 대한 연구", 전자공학회논문지, 51(12), pp.174~179 (2014), 대한전자공학회
  5. 심재구, "방사선과 학생을 위한 가상현실 교육콘텐츠 개발 및 적용을 통한 학습효과 분석", 방사선기술과학, 43(6), pp.519~524 (2020), 대한방사선과학회
  6. 박형후, "혼합현실 기반 방사선 안전교육 시뮬레이터 플랫폼 개발 : 의료분야 중심으로", 방사선기술과학, 44(2), pp.123~131 (2021), 대한방사선과학회
  7. 홍동희, "머신러닝 기반 신체 계측정보를 이용한 CT 피폭선량 예측모델 비교", 방사선기술과학, 43(6), pp.503~509 (2020), 대한방사선과학회
  8. Kwon CM, "Python Machine Learning Complete Guide" (2019), Wikibooks
  9. 박대륜, "머신러닝 플랫폼을 활용한 소프트웨어 교수-학습 모형 개발", 정보교육학회논문지, 24(1), pp.49~57 (2020), 한국정보교육학회[DOI]
  10. Kang IW, "Optimized KNN", SVM algorithm for efficent indoor location, 2011, pp.18(2), 602~605
  11. 이보우, "원자력안전법 수시출입자 안전관리체계 개편에 대한 방사선학과 재학생들의 융합적 인식 연구", 한국융합학회논문지, 10(6), pp.89~94 (2019), 한국융합학회[DOI]
  12. 최필선, "머신러닝 기법을 이용한 대졸자 취업예측 모형", 직업능력개발연구, 21(1), pp.31~54 (2018), 한국직업능력연구원[DOI]
  13. 이기성, "머신러닝을 이용한 의료 및 광고 블로그 분류", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 19(11), pp.730~737 (2018), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
  14. 엄지수, "머신러닝을 이용한 에너지 선택적 유방촬영의 진단 정확도 향상에 관한 연구", 방사선기술과학, 42(1), pp.9~17 (2019), 대한방사선과학회[DOI]
  15. 이인자, "폐경 여성에서 트리기반 머신러닝 모델로부터 골다공증 예측", 방사선기술과학, 43(6), pp.495~502 (2020), 대한방사선과학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)