초음파 의료영상에서 ATS 535H 팬텀을 이용한 해상력 특성 평가
Evaluation of the Resolution Characteristics by Using ATS 535H Phantom for Ultrasound Medical Imaging
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study was purpose to assessment of the resolution characteristics by using ATS 535H Basic quality assurance (QA) phantom for ultrasound. The ultrasound equipment was used Logiq P6 (Ultrasound, GE Healthcare System, Chicago, IL, USA). And the ultrasound transducer were used Convex 4C (4∼5.5 MHz), Linear 11L (10∼13 MHz), Sector 3SP (3∼5.5 MHz) probe. As for the noise power spectrum (NPS) comparison results by using ATS 535H Basic QA ultrasound phantom and Convex 4C, Linear 11L, Sector 3SP probe. The NPS value of the Convex 4C probe image was 0.0049, Linear 11L probe image was 0.0049, Sector 3SP probe image was 0.1422 when the frequency is 1.0 mm-1. The modulation transfer function (MTF) comparison results by using ATS 535H Basic QA ultrasound phantom and Linear 11L probe the MTF value of the 3 cm focus image was 0.7511 and 4 cm focus image was 0.9001 when the frequency is 1.0 mm-1. This study was presented characteristics of spatial resolution a quantitative evaluation methods by using ultrasound medical images for QA of ultrasound medical QA phantom. The quality control (QC) for equipment maintenance can be efficiently used in the clinic due to the quantitative evaluation of the NPS and MTF as the standard methods. It is meaningful in that it is applied mutatis mutandis and presented the results of physical resolution characteristics of the ultrasound medical image.
Abstract
This study was purpose to assessment of the resolution characteristics by using ATS 535H Basic quality assurance (QA) phantom for ultrasound. The ultrasound equipment was used Logiq P6 (Ultrasound, GE Healthcare System, Chicago, IL, USA). And the ultrasound transducer were used Convex 4C (4∼5.5 MHz), Linear 11L (10∼13 MHz), Sector 3SP (3∼5.5 MHz) probe. As for the noise power spectrum (NPS) comparison results by using ATS 535H Basic QA ultrasound phantom and Convex 4C, Linear 11L, Sector 3SP probe. The NPS value of the Convex 4C probe image was 0.0049, Linear 11L probe image was 0.0049, Sector 3SP probe image was 0.1422 when the frequency is 1.0 mm-1. The modulation transfer function (MTF) comparison results by using ATS 535H Basic QA ultrasound phantom and Linear 11L probe the MTF value of the 3 cm focus image was 0.7511 and 4 cm focus image was 0.9001 when the frequency is 1.0 mm-1. This study was presented characteristics of spatial resolution a quantitative evaluation methods by using ultrasound medical images for QA of ultrasound medical QA phantom. The quality control (QC) for equipment maintenance can be efficiently used in the clinic due to the quantitative evaluation of the NPS and MTF as the standard methods. It is meaningful in that it is applied mutatis mutandis and presented the results of physical resolution characteristics of the ultrasound medical image.
참고문헌 (17)
- Sipila O, "Quality assurance in diagnostic ultrasound", European Journal of Radiology, 80, pp.519~525 (2011)
- Kaar M, "Quality Assurance for Ultrasound Scanners using a durable tissue-mimicking Phantom and radial MTF", SPIE, V9040(3), pp.90401C7~ (2014)
- 민정환, "간접평판형 검출기에서 국제전자기술위원회 기준을 통한 잡음전력스펙트럼 비교 연구", 방사선기술과학, 41(5), pp.457~462 (2018), 대한방사선과학회[DOI]
- 민정환, "3.0T 자기공명영상을 이용한 잡음전력스펙트럼 특성 평가", 방사선기술과학, 44(1), pp.31~37 (2021), 대한방사선과학회
- 민정환, "자기공명영상에서 ACR 팬텀을 이용한 해상력 특성 평가", 방사선기술과학, 45(1), pp.11~17 (2022), 대한방사선과학회
- 이정휘, "자기공명영상 장치의 정도관리를 위한 ACR 팬텀의 유용성 및 적정성", 대한영상의학회지, 54(1), pp.47~55 (2006), 대한영상의학회
- Miyati T, "Measurements of MTF and SNR(f)using a subtraction method im MRI", Physics in Medicine and Biology, 47, pp.2961~2972 (2002)
- Steckner MC, "Computing the modulation transfer function of a magnetic resonance imager", Med. Phys, 21, pp.483~489 (1994)
- 민정환, "3.0T 자기공명영상을 이용한 해상력 특성에 대한 연구", 방사선기술과학, 43(4), pp.251~257 (2020), 대한방사선과학회
- 정회원, "CsI(TI) Indirect Flat Panel Detector의 선질에 따른 물리적 영상 평가", 방사선기술과학, 35(2), pp.109~117 (2012), 대한방사선과학회[DOI]
- 김기원, "유방영상에서 엣지를 이용한 물리적 영상 평가", 방사선기술과학, 39(3), pp.415~420 (2016), 대한방사선과학회[DOI]
- Fujita H, "A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography", IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 11(1), pp.34~39 (1992)
- Samei E, "A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device", Medical Physics, 25, pp.102~ (1998)
- Greer PB, "Evaluation of an algorithm for the assessment of the MTF using an edge method", Medical Physics, 27, pp.2048~ (2000)
- IEC(International Electro-technical Commission), "62220-1. Medical electrical equipment Characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices Part 1: Determination of the detective quantum efficiency", ~ (2003)
- 손순룡, "Measurement of Image Quality According to the Time of Computed Radiography System", 방사선기술과학, 38(4), pp.365~374 (2015), 대한방사선과학회[DOI]
- 김기원, "컴퓨터단층검사에서 AAPM Phantom을 이용한 변조전달함수 평가", 방사선기술과학, 39(2), pp.193~198 (2016), 대한방사선과학회[DOI]