본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

전자식 방법의 상법수용에 관련된 법률문제

Legal Problems of Introducing Electronic Means into Commercial Act

2

조회

0

다운로드

20

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Abstract

The amended Commercial Act (2009.5.28) has introduced electronic means into corporation’s public notice, register of shareholders, shareholders’ right to make proposal, minority shareholders’ right to demand extraordinary general meeting, exercise of voting right in disunity, exercise of voting right and exercise of concentrated voting right. Besides these the amendment Bill of Commercial Act has introduced the electronic register of shares, electronic register of shareholder's preemptive right, electronic register of bond and bondholder and convocation of bondholders’ meeting. These have the intent to raise the efficiency of management and also to be able to make shareholder's right to be exercised efficiently. These, however, have several problems not yet solved. As for electronic register of shares, the problems are raised, how to inspect the register and the delay of register. In electronic notification between corporation and shareholder, there is a problem how to secure the authentication of electronic document. The electronic public notice has the problem of how to guarantee the accuracy of its content and timely notice. As for the electronic vote, it has different way of introduction to comparison with vote in writing. These two votes have the same intent of introduction. Difference lies only in the means, that is electronic document or written document. I think the introduction procedure of both should be same and the electronic vote can be used to substitute the vote in writing. It's clear that the use of electronic means may influence the shareholder's right. Through this means shareholder could exercise his/her right easily and promptly. Those means the above-mentioned, eventually could contribute to improve the corporate governance. The matters in recent Amendment or Bill about using of electronic means are not sufficient to compare with foreign country's enactments. It is desirable to introduce the electronic notification by shareholder in all the related matters. I think it is needed to raise the competitiveness of management through inducing electronic means and it's the urgent problem of Corporation Law.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 김순석, "전자주주총회", ~ (2008)
  2. 상장회사주주총회백서, "상장회사협의회", ~ (2009)
  3. 정동윤, "회사법" (2005)
  4. 고재종, "想空間上 株主總會 運用에 관한 檢討", 상사법연구, 21(1), pp.8~247 (2002), 한국상사법학회
  5. , 2008
  6. 김재범, "2007년 상법개정안의 주식 전자등록제도", IT와 법연구, 2 (2007)
  7. 박상근, "인터넷과 주주총회", 서울대학교 법학, 42(1) (2001)
  8. 송호신, "사이버공간의 주주총회", 인터넷법률, (22) (2004)
  9. 양만식, "IT화 시대의 진전에 따른 상법의 장래 -주주총회의 IT화를 바라며-", 상사법연구, 23(1), pp.181~212 (2004), 한국상사법학회
  10. 전국경제인연합회, "국회계류 상법개정안에 대한 검토, 전경련 홈페이지>Current Issue>기업정책>핫이슈>바람직한 상법개정방향", ~ (2007)
  11. 정경영, "전자증권의 법적 성질과 전자등록제도에 관한 고찰", 상사법연구, 22(3) (2003)
  12. 정경영, "電子株主總會의 法理에 관한 試論", 비교사법, 12(4), pp.453~496 (2005), 한국비교사법학회
  13. 정경영, "전자투표제도 도입을 위한 법제 정비 방안에 관한 연구", 상사법연구, 23(3), pp.97~167 (2004), 한국상사법학회
  14. 정대익, "전자공시제도에 대한 법적고찰", 상사법연구, 22(3) (2003)
  15. 정완용, "바람직한 전자투표 인프라 구축방안", 상사법연구, 23(3), pp.183~244 (2004), 한국상사법학회
  16. 정완용, "회사법의 IT화 관련 개정사항에 관한 고찰", 상사법연구, 25(2), pp.209~238 (2006), 한국상사법학회
  17. 정찬형, "주주총회 활성화를 위한 제도개선 방안", 상사법연구, 23(3), pp.43~87 (2004), 한국상사법학회
  18. 차대운, "주주총회의 전자와와 그 법적 과제", 상장협, (46) (2002)
  19. 郡谷大輔, "平成一三年改正商法解說", 商事法務, (1664) (2003)
  20. Daniel Adam Birnhak, "Online Shareholder Meetings", Rutgers Computer & Tech. L.J, 29, pp.423~440 (2003)
  21. "MBCA §7.22(b)", ~
  22. "Delaware General Corporation Law §211(a)(1); §212(d)", ~
  23. "Texas Business Corporation Act Art. 2.24", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)