대ㆍ중소기업의 갈등해소 방안 -대·중소기업간 거래 공정화를 위한 법적 개선방안을 중심으로-
Alternative Solutions to Mitigate Large Enterprises-SMEs Conflicts in Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is concerned with problems and legal solutions of the Large Enterprises-Small and Medium Enterprises(SMEs) conflicts in Korea. Since the financial crisis, the polarization between Large Enterprises and SMEs has become more serious in Korea. the primary cause of the polarization and conflicts between Large Enterprises and SMEs is capability lacking of SMEs and unfair transactions between Large Enterprises and SMEs based on Large Enterprises's demand monopoly. Large Enterprises have abused their dominant positions in transactions with SMEs and have practiced unfair transactions like unfair reduction of subcontract payment, revocation of subcontracting after verbally ordering, stealing of technology in transactions with SMEs etc. To solve the problem of polarization between Large Enterprises and SMEs, we have to adopt the win-win cooperation between Large Enterprises and SMEs. Collaborative subcontracting based on ‘Faith’ and fair transactions between Large Enterprises and SMEs are necessary for the win-win cooperation between Large Enterprises and SMEs. SMEs serve as a source of dynamism of the korean economy and play a leading role in providing goods and services, creating employment opportunities, acting as a seedbed for market competition, and contributing to the development of regional economies and societies. To enable this source of dynamism for the korean economy, the SMEs policies will encourage SMEs to be innovative in business and respond to changes in the business environment, and increase their competitiveness for the growth in the global economy. In order to achieve this,cartel-related exception provision(§19) and controls on Large Enterprises's abusing their dominant positions in 'Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act’ are needed. At the same time, Fair Transactions in Subcontracting Act should be amended towards support for the SMEs policies based on competition policies and the expansion of its application. Furthermore,amendment of report procedure provision(§49) in 'Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act’ and strict enforcement of 'Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act’ and Subcontracting Act are necessary for the collaborative subcontracting based on 'Faith' and fair transactions between Large Enterprises and SMEs.
Abstract
This paper is concerned with problems and legal solutions of the Large Enterprises-Small and Medium Enterprises(SMEs) conflicts in Korea. Since the financial crisis, the polarization between Large Enterprises and SMEs has become more serious in Korea. the primary cause of the polarization and conflicts between Large Enterprises and SMEs is capability lacking of SMEs and unfair transactions between Large Enterprises and SMEs based on Large Enterprises's demand monopoly. Large Enterprises have abused their dominant positions in transactions with SMEs and have practiced unfair transactions like unfair reduction of subcontract payment, revocation of subcontracting after verbally ordering, stealing of technology in transactions with SMEs etc. To solve the problem of polarization between Large Enterprises and SMEs, we have to adopt the win-win cooperation between Large Enterprises and SMEs. Collaborative subcontracting based on ‘Faith’ and fair transactions between Large Enterprises and SMEs are necessary for the win-win cooperation between Large Enterprises and SMEs. SMEs serve as a source of dynamism of the korean economy and play a leading role in providing goods and services, creating employment opportunities, acting as a seedbed for market competition, and contributing to the development of regional economies and societies. To enable this source of dynamism for the korean economy, the SMEs policies will encourage SMEs to be innovative in business and respond to changes in the business environment, and increase their competitiveness for the growth in the global economy. In order to achieve this,cartel-related exception provision(§19) and controls on Large Enterprises's abusing their dominant positions in 'Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act’ are needed. At the same time, Fair Transactions in Subcontracting Act should be amended towards support for the SMEs policies based on competition policies and the expansion of its application. Furthermore,amendment of report procedure provision(§49) in 'Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act’ and strict enforcement of 'Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act’ and Subcontracting Act are necessary for the collaborative subcontracting based on 'Faith' and fair transactions between Large Enterprises and SMEs.
참고문헌 (42)
- 공정거래위원회, "하도급거래 공정화에 관한 법령집" (2008), 공정거래위원회 기업협력국
- 2008년 하도급거래 공정성 평가 결과보고서, "공정거래위원회", 공정거래위원회, ~ (2008)
- 시장거래에서의 대․중소기업간 불공정거래 실태와 개선방안, "공정거래위원회", 공정거래위원회, ~ (2005)
- 권오승, "경제법, 제7판" (2009), 법문사
- 김기찬, "대·중소기업 상생협력의 이론적 모형 설계 -건강하고 지속가능한 기업생태계 구축-", 중소기업연구, 28(3), pp.381~410 (2006), 한국중소기업학회
- 김기찬, "대·중소기업간 상생협력 유형의 세분화와 전략-중소기업의 L, A, J유형 분류와 성과를 중심으로-", 중소기업연구, 29(4), pp.133~151 (2007), 한국중소기업학회
- 김관보, "하도급거래 공정성 평가틀 구축을 위한 시론적 연구 - AHP 기법의 적용 -", 규제연구, 18(2), pp.3~33 (2009), 한국규제학회
- 김범조, "하도급거래 선진화를 위한 하도급정책방향", 건설경제, (25) (2000), 국토연구원
- 중소기업지원 강화방안 하도급(2차이하) 질서개선 등을 중심으로, "김승일", 중소기업연구원, ~ (2004)
- 대·중소기업 납품거래 실태조사, "김승일", 중소기업연구원, ~ (2008)
- 대형마트와 납품 중소기업간 협력강화방안, "김익성", 중소기업연구원, ~ (2007)
- 김인숙, "독일과 한국의 중소기업정책: 질서자유주의적 시각에서의 고찰", 경상논총, 21, pp.31~45 (2000), 한독경상학회
- 김인호, "시장원리와 한국의 경제운용" (2007), 중소기업연구원
- 김종운, "미국의 중소기업정책" (2008), 중소기업연구원
- 김진홍, "하도급법상 대금지급보장 제도에 관한 고찰", 저스티스, 34(1) (2001), 한국법학원
- 김현정, "하청관계에 관한 최근 이론 동향: ‘거래비용’에서 ‘신뢰관계’로", ~ (2001)
- 박세일, "법경제학" (2004), 박영사
- 하도급거래 공정성 제고를 위한 법적 개선방안, "박정구", 중소기업연구원, ~ (2005)
- 박정구, "하도급거래의 문제점과 개선 방안", 경영법률, 17(3), pp.215~254 (2007), 한국경영법률학회
- 2001 한국 제조업의 하도급 실태, "박중구", 산업연구원, ~ (2001)
- 배종태, "대？중소기업 신제품개발 협력과정과 상생정책", 중소기업연구, 29(4), pp.295~318 (2007), 한국중소기업학회
- 삼성경제연구소, "선진국의 중소기업 육성정책과 시사점", ~ (2004)
- 서정대, "중소기업협동조합의 공동사업에 대한 경쟁법적 고찰" (2005), 중소기업연구원
- 신석훈, "기업형 슈퍼마켓(SSM) 규제 입법논리의 문제점" (2009), 한국경제연구원
- 신현윤, "대？중소기업의 상생적 협력을 위한 시장경쟁 보호", 법제연구, (30), pp.121~146 (2006), 한국법제연구원
- 윤세리, "우월적 지위남용의 법률요건", 공정경쟁, (10) (1997), 한국경쟁법학회
- 윤성민, "중소기업-대기업의 바람직한 협력 방식", 기은조사, (가을) (2004), 기은경제연구소
- 이봉의, "대기업과 중소기업간 균형발전을 위한 법제개선방안", 법제연구, (28), pp.7~30 (2005), 한국법제연구원
- 이봉의, "공정거래법상 수요지배력의 남용", 상사판례연구, 14 (2003), 한국상사판례학회
- 이호영, "독점규제법" (2010), 홍문사
- 대·중소기업 상생협력의 전략과 과제, "전경련중소기업협력센터", ~ (2007)
- 경제위기 발생 이후 하도급거래의 현안 및 정책과제, "주현", 산업연구원, ~ (2009)
- 중소기업연구원, "대·중소기업, 상생협력: 해외사례를 중심으로", ~ (2006)
- 공정거래를 통한 대․중소기업 상생협력 시스템 구축 방안, "중소기업중앙회", ~ (2007)
- 21세기 중소기업의 산업경쟁력강화방안, "중소기업청", ~ (1998)
- 한국경제연구원, "글로벌 경쟁체제와 중소기업 정책의 새로운 방향", ~ (2004)
- 한국중소기업학회, "21C 중소기업의 진로", ~ (2000)
- 위기 이후 대·중소기업 양극화 실태와 정책과제, "IBK 경제연구소", ~ (2010)
- Feldmann, Horst, "Eine institutionalistische Revolution? Zur dogmenhistorischen Bedeutung der modernen Institutionenökonomik, Berlin", ~ (1995)
- Furubotn, E., "The New Institutional Economics, New Views of Antitrust, Editorial Preface, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft", Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 147 (1991)
- Kirchner, Christian, "Über das Verhältnis der Rechtswisschenschaft zur Nationalökonomie, Die neue Institutionenökonomie und die Rechtswissenschaft, in: Jahrbuch für Neue politische Ökonomie. Band 7, Herder-Dorneich, Ph.", K.-E.Schenk, pp.1988, ~
- Kirchner, Christian, "Wettbewerbstheoretische Ansätze bei Ronald Coase, in: Wirtschaft udn Wettbewerb", 42~ (1992)