법장 저술의 찬술연대 재검토

Abstract

For the understanding of Fa-zang's(法藏) teachings, at least we must look into his existing 25 writings. In this article, I'll investigating truth-hood and estimating the time of it has been written, which concludes 21 writings on Taisho-Tripitaka(大正藏) and 3 writings on Xuzang -Tripitaka(續藏經) and the other one. Just for example, Bal-Bo-Ri-Shim-Jang(發菩提心章) is the one writing which has question on it's authorship that it concludes a part of Du-shun's(杜順) Fa-jie-guan-men(法界觀門). Since it is so, I tried to get answer by estimating how could I understand the situation of Fa-zang's(法藏) put a part of Fa-jie-guan-men(法界觀門). And also in a case of Po-Hyun-Guan-Heang-Bob-Moon(普賢觀行法門), it hasn't been seen in even in Fa-zang's(法藏) writings such as Hwoa-Ŭm-Gyong-Jŭn-Gy(華嚴經傳記) or Gi-Hea-Dong-Sŭ(寄海東書), so that rises some questions on it's establishing. Of course it could be solved, if we assume that it's writing has been late than these two wriitngs, but the true problem is that list which has recording on this writing is only in Ŭi-chŭn-Rok(義天錄). In other hand, Fa-zang(法藏) emphasized necessity of practise on his many writings about method of contemplation, there is an impression that his basical point of view is philosophical and ideological. In investigation on it's reason, I hope to be discriminated truth-hood of his writings about method of contemplation. Finally, this article objected to examinate any of his other writings which possibly concludes questions about establishing that has been touched up by descendants or corrected in any forms.