본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

외부감사인의 비례책임제도

The proportionate liability of auditors

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

This article discusses the selected issues related to the proportionate liability. Since the adoption of this liability rule in the Act on external Audit of Stock Companies (EASC) and the Financial Investment Services and the Capital Market Act (ISCM) in December 30th 2013, a new regime has begun by presenting specific rules on the liability of statutory auditors. It means a dramatic change of liability forms for statutory auditors from ‘joint & several liability’ to several liability only in exceptive cases. The EASC and the ISCM adopted the new liability regime in their relevant sections in that way:In principle auditors and the client company’s directors shall be as defendants jointly liable for damages to the company or a third party, but exceptionally if one of them violates unknowingly the Acts, then he/she shall be liable for damages according to the ratio of liability determined by a court based on the attributable causes. Notwithstanding the exceptive proportionate liability, if the recognized amount of income of the person is less than 150 million won, then the liability form shall go back to joint liability. Furthermore if the damages did not be paid due to incapability for compensation of any person, the others shall be liable for an additional amount of damages to 50% of their respective ratios of the liability. However we can not find out any compatibility or conformity with our civil liability system due to the heterogeneous regulatory factors. One of critic points lies in that the liability form in which defendants are liable jointly or severally shall depend on the level of income of defendants. In comparison it should be determined by the nature of malpractice(act in concert or not) or the agreement of the parties in our established liability regime. It is also hardly to accept on the other hand that after closing all the procedure of the trial, in case of incapability of someone, another establishment of liability for the additional compensation should be began to discuss. In this respect this paper suggests that the disconformable regulations be replaced by the establishment of pure several liability and that it is an appropriate time to legislate the liability limitation of the statutory auditors just as with EU countries.

Abstract

This article discusses the selected issues related to the proportionate liability. Since the adoption of this liability rule in the Act on external Audit of Stock Companies (EASC) and the Financial Investment Services and the Capital Market Act (ISCM) in December 30th 2013, a new regime has begun by presenting specific rules on the liability of statutory auditors. It means a dramatic change of liability forms for statutory auditors from ‘joint & several liability’ to several liability only in exceptive cases. The EASC and the ISCM adopted the new liability regime in their relevant sections in that way:In principle auditors and the client company’s directors shall be as defendants jointly liable for damages to the company or a third party, but exceptionally if one of them violates unknowingly the Acts, then he/she shall be liable for damages according to the ratio of liability determined by a court based on the attributable causes. Notwithstanding the exceptive proportionate liability, if the recognized amount of income of the person is less than 150 million won, then the liability form shall go back to joint liability. Furthermore if the damages did not be paid due to incapability for compensation of any person, the others shall be liable for an additional amount of damages to 50% of their respective ratios of the liability. However we can not find out any compatibility or conformity with our civil liability system due to the heterogeneous regulatory factors. One of critic points lies in that the liability form in which defendants are liable jointly or severally shall depend on the level of income of defendants. In comparison it should be determined by the nature of malpractice(act in concert or not) or the agreement of the parties in our established liability regime. It is also hardly to accept on the other hand that after closing all the procedure of the trial, in case of incapability of someone, another establishment of liability for the additional compensation should be began to discuss. In this respect this paper suggests that the disconformable regulations be replaced by the establishment of pure several liability and that it is an appropriate time to legislate the liability limitation of the statutory auditors just as with EU countries.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 강봉석, "부진정연대채무자들이 부담하는 구상채무의 법적 성질", 민사판례연구, (26), pp.125~150 (2004), 민사판례연구회
  2. 강신섭, "증권관련집단소송의 전망과 대비책", BFL, (8) (2004), 서울대 금융법센터
  3. 곽윤직, (2004), 박영사
  4. 김건식, "증권거래법" (2000), 두성사
  5. 감사인의 손해배상책임, "김건식", 한국공인회계사회, ~ (1998)
  6. 김건식, "자본시장법 제3판" (2013), 두성사
  7. 김준호, "채권총칙-이론·사례·판례" (2007), 법문사
  8. 김증한, "채권총론" (1998), 박영사
  9. 박영규, "'부진정 연대채무' 이론 비판", 민사법학, (48), pp.283~309 (2010), 한국민사법학회
  10. 송덕수, "신민법강의" (2010), 박영사
  11. 신영무, "증권거래법" (1987), 서울대학교출판부
  12. 양승규, "감사인의 제3자에 대한 손해배상책임", 법학, 38(3·4) (1997), 서울대
  13. 이종남, "전강 이종원박사 고희기념 법과 경제(상)" (1996), 일신사
  14. 李俊燮, "증권집단소송의 도입과 증권거래법상 손해배상책임체계의 개선방안", 증권법연구, 4(2), pp.1~65 (2003), 한국증권법학회
  15. 이준섭, "감사책임법" (2005), 법문사
  16. 이성우, "비례책임제도 도입과 자본시장 투자자 보호에 관한 연구", 강원법학, 41, pp.825~858 (2014), 비교법학연구소
  17. 임재연, "자본시장법" (2010), 박영사
  18. 최광선, "개정 외감법 상의 비례책임제도에 관한 고찰", 저스티스, 143, pp.30~66 (2014), 한국법학원
  19. 최문희, "증권관련집단소송과 비례적 책임(Proportionate Liablilty) 에 관한 소고 - 도입여부와 추가부담재판에 관한 고찰을 중심으로 -", 증권법연구, 6(1), pp.73~106 (2005), 한국증권법학회
  20. 최문희, "회계감사인의 비례책임제도의 쟁점과 바람직한 운용방안 - 개정 외감법에 대한 비판적 고찰과 개선과제를 중심으로 -", 저스티스, 144, pp.240~287 (2014), 한국법학원
  21. 한국증권법학회, "주석서 II" (2009), 박영사
  22. 홍성주, "부진정연대채무에서의 구상관계의 성질 – 대법원 2005.10.13., 선고 2003다24147판결-", 판례연구, 19 (2008), 부산판례연구회
  23. "The Law of Torts" (2010), Wolters Kluwer
  24. Richard A. Epstein, "Cases and Materials on Torts"
  25. Steven L. Emanuel, "Torts" (2009), Wolters Kluwer

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)