프랑스인의 문화적 정체성 연구
A Study on the Identity of French Culture
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The paper develops the various liaisons that may be established between the words ‘culture’ and ‘identity’ and through this interaction define as to what may actually constitute as being the dynamics behind cultural understanding. Most of the studies relating to culture and societal environments in the past were largely based on nationalistic movements which were quite frequently influenced by political landscapes of the concerned society. To surmount this obstacle and misunderstandings the paper proposes to delimit the subject of research to, and only to, outstanding cultural aspects. The research will limit and focus on France today, which is a multi-cultural society. The decision to limit the boundaries thus to France was made, in that France had already gone through the turbulence of establishing a multi-cultural society. The cultural superiority theory in France of the ethnic group Gaul, which is an union of German and Frank ethnic societies, is only a nationalistic outburst and has no basis and should not be taken seriously. The historical religious denomination also should be discarded. Even though the Roman Catholics and the Protestants both make up a large part of the population, the French today identify more with laïcité rather then with the traditional religions. The French language should also be taken out of the equation because French as a language only began to be used widely across the country in the latter half of the 19th century. In short, what we mean by French today is rather difficult to discern. And to this end the cultural means may be the last objectival solution as to identify what truly refers to being ‘French.’ The cultural identities of the past and the present that one identifies may give us an insight as to how cultural identity of a society will evolve in the future. To maintain objectivity of the research, words ethnically incorrect will also be addressed. It is to limit general prejudice and occasional stereotyping that one might have to answer to in order for the research to conclude with a satisfying result. Finally, it is necessary not to be satisfied with just a proclamatory result but to see it as an ‘activer’ of cultural circumstances.
Abstract
The paper develops the various liaisons that may be established between the words ‘culture’ and ‘identity’ and through this interaction define as to what may actually constitute as being the dynamics behind cultural understanding. Most of the studies relating to culture and societal environments in the past were largely based on nationalistic movements which were quite frequently influenced by political landscapes of the concerned society. To surmount this obstacle and misunderstandings the paper proposes to delimit the subject of research to, and only to, outstanding cultural aspects. The research will limit and focus on France today, which is a multi-cultural society. The decision to limit the boundaries thus to France was made, in that France had already gone through the turbulence of establishing a multi-cultural society. The cultural superiority theory in France of the ethnic group Gaul, which is an union of German and Frank ethnic societies, is only a nationalistic outburst and has no basis and should not be taken seriously. The historical religious denomination also should be discarded. Even though the Roman Catholics and the Protestants both make up a large part of the population, the French today identify more with laïcité rather then with the traditional religions. The French language should also be taken out of the equation because French as a language only began to be used widely across the country in the latter half of the 19th century. In short, what we mean by French today is rather difficult to discern. And to this end the cultural means may be the last objectival solution as to identify what truly refers to being ‘French.’ The cultural identities of the past and the present that one identifies may give us an insight as to how cultural identity of a society will evolve in the future. To maintain objectivity of the research, words ethnically incorrect will also be addressed. It is to limit general prejudice and occasional stereotyping that one might have to answer to in order for the research to conclude with a satisfying result. Finally, it is necessary not to be satisfied with just a proclamatory result but to see it as an ‘activer’ of cultural circumstances.
참고문헌 (45)
- 기어리, 패트릭, "메로빙거 세계" (2002), 지식의 풍경
- 길리아노, 미레유, "프랑스 여자는 살찌지 않는다" (2005), 물푸레
- 김남연, "퓨전의 미학: 프랑스 문화", 프랑스문화예술연구, 3, pp.1~15 (2000)
- 김붕구, "프랑스 문학사" (1999), 일조각
- 르코프, 자크, "유럽역사 이야기" (2006), 새물결
- 리비에르, 다니엘, "프랑스의 역사" (1998), 까치
- 박정현, "프랑스인은 배꼽도 잘났다" (1998), 자작나무
- 사르다르, 지아우딘, "문화연구" (2002), 김영사
- 쇼도르네, 마리 클래르, "프랑스 낭만주의" (2000), 창해
- 오영주, "신의 왕국에서 인간의 사회로, In 프랑스", pp.11~30 (2004), 강
- 유시민, "프랑스 문화 이야기" (1993), 푸른나무
- 장석훈, "프랑스 이야기" (2008), 아이세움
- 존스, 콜린, "케임브리지 프랑스 사" (2001), 시공사
- 최호열, "프랑스와 프랑스인" (1998), 어문학사
- 프로서. 로버트, "프랑스" (2008), 김영사
- Allemand, Sylvain, "Une singularité française", Sciences Humaines, (46), pp.6~7 (2004)
- Bermond, Daniel, "Conscience européenne: mythe ou réalité", Label France, (40), pp.4~ (2000)
- Braudel, Fernand, "L’identité de la France Les hommes et les choses I" (1986), Flammarion (Champs histoire)
- Braudel, Fernand, "L’identité de la France Les hommes et les choses II" (1986), Flammarion (Champs histoire)
- Brunaux, Jean-Louis, "Nos ancêtres les Gaulois", L’Histoire, (326), pp.34~41 (2007)
- Chaine, Valérie, "Paris, capitale des salons internationaux", Label France, (41), pp.30~31 (2000)
- Cumer, Léon, "Les Français peints par eux-mêmes" (2003), La Découverte(Omnibus)
- Dumézil, Bruno, "Le bon temps des rois mérovingiens", L’Histoire, (358), pp.40~45 (2010)
- Fassin, Didier, "Y a-t-il des discriminations raciales en France", L’Histoire, (306), pp.52~57 (2006)
- Halpern, Catherine, "Faut-il en finir avec l’identité?, In Identité", pp.11~20 (2004), Editions Sciences Humaines
- Journet, Nicolas, "L’Identité culturelle : illusions et conséquences, In La Culture", pp.213~216 (2002), Editions Sciences Humaines
- Journet, Nicolas, "Que faire de la culture?, In La Culture", pp.1~13 (2002), Editions Sciences Humaines
- Keller, Rodolphe, "C‘est Charlmagne qui a inventé l’école", Historia, (38) (2009)
- Larané, André, "Les grands nom de l’histoire" (2007), Librio
- Le Gendre, Bertrand, "La grande vadrouille républicaine", Le Monde (2010)
- Le Goff, Jacques, "Le triomphe de la Chrétienté", L’Histoire, pp.26~ (2008)
- Leterrier, Sophie Anne, "Sa vie et son oeuvre", L'Histoire, (363), pp.42~49 (2011)
- Madière, Jean-Paul, "Français et catholiques toujours!", L’Histoire, (165), pp.77~79 (1993)
- Mallégol, Annie, "Cinéma français l'âge d’or" (2005), Editions Atlas
- Moléna, Xavier, "L’identité nationale, un concept fourre-tout", Sciences Humaines, (18), pp.76~ (2010)
- Ndiaye, Pap, "Etats-Unis: un siècle de ségrégation", L’Histoire, (306), pp.46~51 (2006)
- Petitier, Paule, "Histoire ou roman", L'Histoire, (363), pp.50~55 (2011)
- Postel-Vinay, Olivier, "Nous descendons tous de Charlmagne", L’Histoire, (326), pp.46~ (2007)
- Reynaert, François, "Les mensonges de l’Histoire de France", Le Nouvel Observateur, 7(13), pp.14~26 (2010)
- Ruano-Borbalan, "Identité" (2004), Editions Sciences Humaines
- Solenn Carof, "De Jules Michelet à Hippolyte Taine", Sciences Humaines, (6), pp.34~35 (2007)
- Blottière, Mathilde, "Française", Télérama, 3154, pp.115~ (2010)
- Theis, Laurent, "France, qu’as-tu fait de ton batême", L’Histoire, (331), pp.82~ (2008)
- Vircondelet, Alain, "“Un défi à l’ordre bourgeois”, La Saga de l’impressionnisme", Beaux Arts (hors-série) (2010)
- Wilnock, Michel, "Entretien avec Pierre Nora", L'Histoire, (363), pp.66~69 (2011)