Critical/Dystopian Approaches to High-Tech Surveillance Capitalist Societies in “Nosedive” and “The Perfect Match”
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper explores the dystopian visions presented in Charlie Brooker’s “Nosedive” and Ken Liu’s “The Perfect Match,” delving into their unsettling portrayals of a future (or parallel present) that challenges the optimistic narratives tech giants tend to spin about digitally augmented, eternally connected world. Both narratives, featuring worlds run by corporations resembling Meta and Google, prompt reflection on how personal online behaviors contribute to a dehumanizing surveillance structure that erodes autonomy, reducing individuals to exploitable data within the neoliberal capitalist market. The earlier half of this paper explores the ways in whichthe lateral surveillance we see in “Nosedive” turns society into a glass paneled panopticon, making the world shallower and narrower. The rating system based on lateral surveillance undermines democracy and disempowers individuals, forcing them behave asdocile consumers and monetizable data to be harnessed by corporations and the State in their efforts to reinforce surveillance capitalism. The latter part of this paper focuses on “The Perfect Match,” which offers a more direct glimpse into surveillance capitalism’s mechanisms. The story portrays a future where people willingly surrender personal data and autonomy to tech giants, lured by the convenience provided by high-tech devices such as “Tilly,” a personal assistant program. The story also serves as a cautionary tale, revealing how this surrender reduces humans to data reservoirs and consumers that can be easily exploited through specifically targeted product recommendations. While Brooker and Liu’s futures appear grim, I interpret “Nosedive” and “The Perfect Match” as critical dystopian texts infused with hope, for the open endings we find in both reveal the writers’ beliefs in human’s resistant agency, which cannot be fully extinguished under the grip of high-tech surveillance societies.
Abstract
This paper explores the dystopian visions presented in Charlie Brooker’s “Nosedive” and Ken Liu’s “The Perfect Match,” delving into their unsettling portrayals of a future (or parallel present) that challenges the optimistic narratives tech giants tend to spin about digitally augmented, eternally connected world. Both narratives, featuring worlds run by corporations resembling Meta and Google, prompt reflection on how personal online behaviors contribute to a dehumanizing surveillance structure that erodes autonomy, reducing individuals to exploitable data within the neoliberal capitalist market. The earlier half of this paper explores the ways in whichthe lateral surveillance we see in “Nosedive” turns society into a glass paneled panopticon, making the world shallower and narrower. The rating system based on lateral surveillance undermines democracy and disempowers individuals, forcing them behave asdocile consumers and monetizable data to be harnessed by corporations and the State in their efforts to reinforce surveillance capitalism. The latter part of this paper focuses on “The Perfect Match,” which offers a more direct glimpse into surveillance capitalism’s mechanisms. The story portrays a future where people willingly surrender personal data and autonomy to tech giants, lured by the convenience provided by high-tech devices such as “Tilly,” a personal assistant program. The story also serves as a cautionary tale, revealing how this surrender reduces humans to data reservoirs and consumers that can be easily exploited through specifically targeted product recommendations. While Brooker and Liu’s futures appear grim, I interpret “Nosedive” and “The Perfect Match” as critical dystopian texts infused with hope, for the open endings we find in both reveal the writers’ beliefs in human’s resistant agency, which cannot be fully extinguished under the grip of high-tech surveillance societies.
참고문헌 (29)
- 안아람, "구미호 서사의 SF적 변용ㅡ 켄 리우의 굿 헌팅 에 나타난 인지적 소외", 영어영문학21, 35(4), pp.7~30 (2022), 21세기영어영문학회[DOI]
- "Online Social Networking as Participatory Surveillance" (2008)[URL]
- Allard-Huver, Francois, "Black Mirror and Critical Media Theory", pp.43~54 (2018), Lexington Books
- Andrejevic, Mark, "The Work of Watching One Another: Lateral Surveillance, Risk, and Governance", Surveillance & Society, 2(4), pp.479~497 (2005)
- Andrejevic, Mark, "The Discipline of Watching: Detection, Risk, and Lateral Surveillance", Critical Studies in Media Communication, 23(5), pp.391~407 (2006)
- Baccolini, Raffaella, "The Persistence of Hope in Dystopian Science Fiction", PMLA, 119(3), pp.518~521 (2004)
- Balasopoulos, Antonis, "Utopia Project Archive, 2006-2010", School of Fine Arts Publications
- Brooker, Charlie, "Nosedive. Black Mirror", Netflix, Season 3, Episode 1, ~ (2016)
- Dolgoy, Erin. A, "Short Stories and Political Philosophy: Power, Prose, and Persuasion", pp.21~50 (2018), Lexington Books
- Forster, E. M., "The Machine Stops. 1909" (2011), Penguin
- Giraoldo-Luque, Santiago, "Reading Black Mirror: Insights into Technology and the Post-Media Condition", pp.165~182 (2021), Transcript
- Dystopia: Conditions of Historical Possibility, "Utopia", pp.2010, Gordin, Michael D
- Grimmelmann, James, "Speech Engines", Minnesota Law Review, 299, pp.869~950 (2014)
- Hoffman-Andrews, Jacob, "Verizon Injecting Perma-Cookies to Track Mobile Customers, Bypassing Privacy Controls", Electronic Frontier Foundation, ~ (2014)
- Kim, Jin, "Algorithmic Intimacy, Prosthetic Memory, and Gamification in Black Mirror", Journal of Popular Film and Television, 49(2), pp.110~118 (2021)
- "The Complicated Truth About China’s Social Credit System" (2018)[URL]
- Liu, Ken, "The Paper Menagerie and Other Stories" (2016), Saga
- Maziarczyk, Grzegorz, "Transhumanist Dreams and", as Posthuman Nightmares in Black Mirror, 2018, pp.66, 125~136
- Moylan, Thomas, "Scraps of an Untainted Sky" (2000), Westview Press
- Mu, Yang, "From Nature to Humanity: Renaissance of Chinese Cosmology and Technology in Ken Liu’s The Grace of Kings", Comparative Literature studies, 57(4), pp.744~757 (2020)
- Redmond, Sean, "Through the Black Mirror: Deconstructing the Side Effects of the Digital Age", pp.111~123 (2019), Palgrave Macmillan
- Senra, Flavio Pereira Senra, "Black Mirror and the Cybrid Contemporaneity", Seven Bridges, 5, pp.2~11 (2017)
- Sinnerbrink, Robert, "Philosophical Reflections on Black Mirror", pp.11~29 (2021), Bloomsbury
- Tahira Jabeen, "Magical Realism in Ken Liu’s Short Stories", The Dialogue, 17(4), pp.1~16 (2022)
- Uruena, Sergio, "Black Mirror and Philosophy: Dark Reflections" (2020), John Wiley and Sons
- Vint, Sherryl, "Science Fiction" (2021), The MIT Press
- Yazdizadeh, Abdolali, "In and Out of the Black Mirror; an Ideological Investigation into ‘Nosedive.’", Limina, 25(1), pp.16~28 (2019)
- Zuboff, Shoshana, "The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power" (2019), Profile Books
- Zuboff, Shoshana, "High Tech is Watching You", Business & Economy, ~ (2019)