Klein식 정신분석 기법의 실제
Techniques in Kleinian Psychoanalysis
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
When Melanie Klein’s ideas about psychoanalysis were first introduced, they immediately stirred the considerable controversy over their effectiveness and appropriateness. It is also well known that it led to the intense debate between the so-called contemporary “Freudians” and “Kleinians”, the two prominent schools in the British Psychoanalytic Society for the following several years in the 1940s. Despite the attention, the ”Kleinian analysis” has never been clearly defined, nor has it been distinctly differentiated from other analytic schools. It is believed, however, that Kleinian analysts employ different techniques, some of which are regarded by analysts in different schools as “harmful” to patients or their analytic progress. These controversial points are related to: the timing of so-called “transference interpretation”; their emphasis on ”here and now” situation; diminished value on reconstruction during the course of analytic work. In my view, it is mainly the Kleinian analysis’ conceptual or theoretical differences that contributed to the development of its characteristic techniques. Melanie Klein has known to have developed her technique for analytic work with children, while maintaining traditional analytic values. She came to explore “primitive defenses”during the preverbal period, which Freud had never observed directly. The direct experiences with children and new findings enabled her to challenge Sigmund Freud’s theory and his technique and were eventually developed into new ideas. In my view, however, Kleinian analysts would still argue their techniques are not deliberate diversion from the traditional analytics,but designed simply to meet traditional analytic goals.
Abstract
When Melanie Klein’s ideas about psychoanalysis were first introduced, they immediately stirred the considerable controversy over their effectiveness and appropriateness. It is also well known that it led to the intense debate between the so-called contemporary “Freudians” and “Kleinians”, the two prominent schools in the British Psychoanalytic Society for the following several years in the 1940s. Despite the attention, the ”Kleinian analysis” has never been clearly defined, nor has it been distinctly differentiated from other analytic schools. It is believed, however, that Kleinian analysts employ different techniques, some of which are regarded by analysts in different schools as “harmful” to patients or their analytic progress. These controversial points are related to: the timing of so-called “transference interpretation”; their emphasis on ”here and now” situation; diminished value on reconstruction during the course of analytic work. In my view, it is mainly the Kleinian analysis’ conceptual or theoretical differences that contributed to the development of its characteristic techniques. Melanie Klein has known to have developed her technique for analytic work with children, while maintaining traditional analytic values. She came to explore “primitive defenses”during the preverbal period, which Freud had never observed directly. The direct experiences with children and new findings enabled her to challenge Sigmund Freud’s theory and his technique and were eventually developed into new ideas. In my view, however, Kleinian analysts would still argue their techniques are not deliberate diversion from the traditional analytics,but designed simply to meet traditional analytic goals.
참고문헌 (21)
- Bion WR, "Learning from experience" (1962), Heinemann
- Bion WR, "Second thoughts" (1967), Heinemann
- Freud S., "Contruction in analysis. SE 23", pp.59~145 (1937), Hogarth Press
- Freud S, "Inhibitions, symptoms and anxiety. SE 20", pp.87~175 (1926), Hogarth Press
- Freud S, "Remembering, repeating and working through. SE 12", pp.147~156 (1914), Hogarth Press
- Hinshelwood RD, "A dictionary of Kleinian thought" (1988), Free Association Books
- Joseph B, "The patient who is difficult to reach, In Tactics and techniques in psycho-analytic therapy, Vol 2", pp.205~216 (1975), Jason Aronson
- Joseph B, "Transference: the total situation", Int J Psychoanal, 66, pp.447~454 (1985)
- Klein M., "Envy and Gratitude" (1957), Tavistock
- Klein M, "Narrative of a child analysis" (1961), Hogarth Press
- Klein M., "Notes on some schizoid mechanisms", Int J Psychoanal, 27(Pt 3-4), pp.99~110 (1946)
- Klein M, "The Writings of Melanie Klein, Vol. I, In The Writings of Melanie Klein, Vol. I", pp.248~257 (1975), Hogarth
- Klein M., "The Writings of Melanie Klein, Vol 3, In The Writings of Melanie Klein, Vol 3", pp.48~56 (1975), Horgarth Press
- Malcolm RR, "The constitution and operation of the super-ego", Psychoanal Psychother, 3, pp.149~159 (1988)
- Rosenfeld H, "Analysis of a schizophrenic state with depersonalization", Int J Psychoanal, 28, pp.130~139 (1947)
- Sandler J, "The past unconscious, the present unconscious, and interpretation of the transference", Psychoanal Inq, 4, pp.367~399 (1984)
- Segal H, "Depression in the schizophrenic", Int J Psychoanal, 37, pp.339~343 (1956)
- Segal H., "The curative factors in psycho-analysis", Int J Psychoanal, 43, pp.212~217 (1962)
- Spillius EB, "Melanie Klein Today" (1988), Routledge
- Strachey J., "Symposium on the theory of the therapeutic results of psychoanalysis", Int J psychoanalysis, 18, pp.139~145 (1937)
- Strachey J., "The nature of the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis", Int J Psychoanal, 15, pp.127~159 (1934)