본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

해석학의 함정

Trap of Hermeneutics

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Since Freud founded psychoanalysis, it has been evolved ceaselessly to maintain the position as a valid theory and an effective treatment method. Here is a philosophical discipline that has influenced the development of psychoanalysis; this is contemporary hermeneutics. Hermeneutics is a major step in the philosophical field, about reaching the truth of humans and our world. Hermeneuticists argue that natural science is inadequate as a methodology to understand the truth, and they developed the hermeneutic concept for new methodology, i.e., to participate in the dialogue and understand the interaction between the dyad. Under the hermeneutic influence, the focus of psychoanalytic practice has been moved into understanding the meaning created in the relationship from the objective observation and interpretation of repressed unconscious contents. Inspired by hermeneutics, psycho- analysis turned over a modern methodology and theory in terms of investigation for the human psyche and expanded its realm to the whole human society and culture. However, some analysts and philosophers point out the danger that followed with merging psychoanalytic practice with hermeneutic concepts excessively. They are concerned that the status of psychoanalysis as a science would be damaged by the attitude that devalues the metapsychological theory and objective observation as a methodology of psychoanalysis. The author agrees that the concept of natural science and hermeneutic discipline should integrate dialectically to be more valid and more effective theory and methodology. However, at the same time, the author argues that in the contemporary trend of psychoanalysis, analysts weigh the excessive value on the creation of new narratives and new meaning, and they have the possibility of danger that they would lose the essential tool to address the resistance of patient and therapist’s unconscious. This paper’s focus is that we must not forget the nature and the goal of psychoanalysis that the repressed state of the patient should be explored using objective observation through overcoming patient’s and therapist’s resistance against it, to devote the human society as a valuable tool for investigating and treating human psychic phenomena.

Abstract

Since Freud founded psychoanalysis, it has been evolved ceaselessly to maintain the position as a valid theory and an effective treatment method. Here is a philosophical discipline that has influenced the development of psychoanalysis; this is contemporary hermeneutics. Hermeneutics is a major step in the philosophical field, about reaching the truth of humans and our world. Hermeneuticists argue that natural science is inadequate as a methodology to understand the truth, and they developed the hermeneutic concept for new methodology, i.e., to participate in the dialogue and understand the interaction between the dyad. Under the hermeneutic influence, the focus of psychoanalytic practice has been moved into understanding the meaning created in the relationship from the objective observation and interpretation of repressed unconscious contents. Inspired by hermeneutics, psycho- analysis turned over a modern methodology and theory in terms of investigation for the human psyche and expanded its realm to the whole human society and culture. However, some analysts and philosophers point out the danger that followed with merging psychoanalytic practice with hermeneutic concepts excessively. They are concerned that the status of psychoanalysis as a science would be damaged by the attitude that devalues the metapsychological theory and objective observation as a methodology of psychoanalysis. The author agrees that the concept of natural science and hermeneutic discipline should integrate dialectically to be more valid and more effective theory and methodology. However, at the same time, the author argues that in the contemporary trend of psychoanalysis, analysts weigh the excessive value on the creation of new narratives and new meaning, and they have the possibility of danger that they would lose the essential tool to address the resistance of patient and therapist’s unconscious. This paper’s focus is that we must not forget the nature and the goal of psychoanalysis that the repressed state of the patient should be explored using objective observation through overcoming patient’s and therapist’s resistance against it, to devote the human society as a valuable tool for investigating and treating human psychic phenomena.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. Bion WR, "Notes on memory and desire", Psychoanal Forum, 2, pp.272~280 (1967)
  2. Bion WR, "Clinical seminars and four papers", pp.1~18 (1987), Fleetwood Press
  3. Blight JG, "Must psychoanalysis retreat to hermeneutics? : psychoanalytic theory in the light of Popper’s evolutionary epistemology", Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 4, pp.147~205 (1981)
  4. Brenner C, "Psychoanalysis and science", J Am Psychoanal Assoc, 16, pp.675~696 (1968)
  5. Edelson M, "The hermeneutic turn and the single case study in psychoanalysis", Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 8, pp.567~614 (1985)
  6. Feynman RP, "The meaning of it all: thoughts of a citizen-scientist" (1998), Addison Wesley
  7. Freud S, "Project of a scientific psychology. The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, volume I", pp.283~397 (1895), Hogarth
  8. Freud S, "Remembering, repeating and working through. The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, volume XII", pp.145~156 (1914), Hogarth
  9. Freud S, "A short account of psychoanalysis. The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, volume XIX", pp.189~210 (1924), Hogarth
  10. Freud S, "Autobiographical study. The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, volume XX", pp.40~41 (1925), Hogarth
  11. Freud S, "New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, volume XXII", pp.80~ (1933), Hogarth
  12. Freud S, "An outline of psycho-analysis. The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, volume XXIII", pp.179~ (1940), Hogarth
  13. Friedman L, "Modern hermeneutics and psychoanalysis", Psychoanal Q, 69, pp.225~264 (2000)
  14. Fusella P, "Hermeneutics versus science in psychoanalysis : a resolution to the controversy over the scientific status of psychoanalysis", Psychoanal Rev, 101, pp.871~894 (2014)
  15. Gadamer HG, "Truth and method" (1975), Seabury Press
  16. Gedo JE, "Reflections on metapsychology, theoretical coherence, hermeneutics, and biology", J Am Psychoanal Assoc, 45, pp.779~806 (1997)
  17. Gill MM, "Metapsychology revisited", Annu Psychoanal, 16, pp.35~48 (1988)
  18. Hartmann H, "Notes on"psychoanalysis and science : the concept of structure"", Annu Psychoanal, 1, pp.82~87 (1973)
  19. Kohut H, "On empathy", Int J Psychoanal Self Psychol, 5, pp.122~131 (2010)
  20. Mitchell SA, "The analyst’s knowledge and authority", Psychoanal Q, 67, pp.1~31 (1998)
  21. Ogden TH, "Reclaiming unlived life: experiences in psychoanalysis", pp.71~89 (2016), Routledge
  22. Palmer RE, "Hermeneutics: interpretation theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer", pp.69~72 (1969), Northwestern University Press
  23. Ricoeur P, "The question of proof in Freud’s psychoanalytic writings", J Am Psychoanal Assoc, 25, pp.835~871 (1977)
  24. Schafer R, "A new langauage for psychoanalysis" (1976), Yale University Press
  25. Slochower J, "Holding and the fate of the analyst’s subjectivity", Psychoanal Dialogues, 6, pp.323~353 (1996)
  26. Spence DP, "Narrative truth and historical truth: meaning and interpretation in psychoanalysis" (1982), W. W. Norton
  27. Spence DP, "The hermeneutic turn soft science or loyal opposition?", Psychoanal Dialogues, 3, pp.1~10 (1993)
  28. Steele RS, "Psychoanalysis and hermeneutics", Int J Psychoanal, 6, pp.389~411 (1979)
  29. Wallerstein RS, "Psychoanalysis as a science : a response to the new challenges", Psychoanal Q, 55, pp.414~451 (1986)
  30. Wallerstein RS, "Will psychoanalytic pluralism be an enduring state of our discipline", Int J Psychoanal, 86(Pt 3), pp.623~626 (2005)
  31. Wallerstein RS, "What kind of research in psychoanalytic science?", Int J Psychoanal, 90, pp.109~133 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (1건)