改名許可의 要件 ―대법원 2005. 11. 16.자 2005스26 결정(公 2006상, 35)―
The requirements for the change of given name
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The decision of the Korean Supreme Court on November 16, 2005 declared that the change of given name should be granted if there is an adequate reason and it is not an abuse of right. This decision was welcomed by many because it has expanded the freedom to change the given name. But it is not clear why there should be an adequate reason for change of given name. This article surveys the discussions on this problem in Korea, makes a comparative analysis, and concludes that the requirement of adequate reason is unnecessary because of the following reasons. First, the Korean statutory law prescribes no such requirement. Second, in view of the fact that the freedom to change one’s given name belongs to the human right guaranteed by Constitution, there should be a compelling reason to restrict such freedom. Consequently, the petition to change one’s given name should be always granted unless there is a special circumstances that make the petition an abuse of the right. It seems that after this decision the Korean courts require no adequate reason also practically.
Abstract
The decision of the Korean Supreme Court on November 16, 2005 declared that the change of given name should be granted if there is an adequate reason and it is not an abuse of right. This decision was welcomed by many because it has expanded the freedom to change the given name. But it is not clear why there should be an adequate reason for change of given name. This article surveys the discussions on this problem in Korea, makes a comparative analysis, and concludes that the requirement of adequate reason is unnecessary because of the following reasons. First, the Korean statutory law prescribes no such requirement. Second, in view of the fact that the freedom to change one’s given name belongs to the human right guaranteed by Constitution, there should be a compelling reason to restrict such freedom. Consequently, the petition to change one’s given name should be always granted unless there is a special circumstances that make the petition an abuse of the right. It seems that after this decision the Korean courts require no adequate reason also practically.
참고문헌 (30)
- 高永祺, "戶籍法上의 改名許可基準의 調査分析:民事損害賠償算定․刑事量刑基準의 調査分析", 裁判資料,, 16(4) (1983)
- 金建興, "改名許可基準에 관한 一考察:民事損害賠償算定․刑事量刑基準의 調査分析", 裁判資料, 16(4) (1983)
- 金仁兼, "개명허가의 기준, 대법원판례해설 2005년 하반기" (2005)
- 김형석, "기본권이 한국 사법에 미친 영향, 변화하는 사회에서의 법의 변천", 제3회 서울법대-프라이부르그 법대 공동 심포지엄 자료집 (2006)
- 南容熙, "戶籍法上의 改名許可 基準: 民事損害賠償算定․刑事量刑基準의 調査分析", 裁判資料, 16(4) (1983)
- 成樂仁, "憲法學. 제7판" (2007)
- 梁範錫, "改名의 許可基準: 家庭法院事件의 諸問題(下)", 裁判資料, (102) (2003)
- 梁彰洙, "子의 이름에 대하여" (2006), 民法散策
- 尹眞秀, "傳統的 家族制度와 憲法", 서울대학교 법학, 47(2) (2006)
- 李垠廷, "姓의 변경:家庭法院事件의 諸問題(下) 제102집" (2003), 裁判資料
- 鄭宗燮, "憲法學原論 제2판" (2007)
- 鄭周洙, "鄭宗燮", pp.12~ (1981), 法曹
- 鄭周洙, "改名許可事由와 基準에 관한 考察", pp.2~ (2006), 司法行政
- 趙相根, "改名에 관한 小考" (2000), 새울법학
- "谷口知平" (1978), 戶籍法
- 飯田, "改名許可基準と手續", 判例タイムズ, ~ (1991)
- 小林, "いわゆる ｢氏名選擇權｣と憲法十三條", 判例時報, (1117) (1984)
- 二宮周平, "子の氏(名)の變更", 民商法雜誌, 111(4․5) (1995)
- Elisabeth Berger, "Erwerb und Änderung des Familiennamens," (2001)
- Murswiek, "Grundgesetz" (1999), 2.Aufl
- Schwerdtner, "Münchener Kommentar zum B̂̂ürgerlichen Gesetzbuch", pp.2001
- Bernhard Raschauer, "Namensrecht" (1978)
- Staudinger, "Kommentar zum B̂̂ürgerlichen Gesetzbuch mit Einführungsgesetz und Nebengesetzen", pp.2004, Habermann
- Michael Wagner-Kern,, "Staat und Namensänderung," (2002)
- Les personnes. 21e édition, "Droit Civil 1", pp.2000, Jean Carbonnier
- Droit de la famille,, "sous la direction de Jacqueline Rubellin-Devichi," (2001)
- sous la direction de Jacqueline Rubellin-Devichi,, "par Éric Hirsoux." (1994), Art
- Nicole Lapierre, "Changer de nom" (2006)
- Philippe Malaurie, "Droit Civil Les personnes Les incapacités" (2003)
- Bernard Teyssié, "Droit civil Les personnes, 8e édition" (2003)