가족관계등록부의 공시기능과 개인정보보호
Publicity of Status Registration on Family Relation Registration Act and Protection of Personal Information
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examines the implications of the protection of personal information in the family registration system, and examines the problems and related legislative changes discussed in relation to the protection of personal information in the Family Relations Registration Act. In addition, we reviewed the remedies for the remaining issues in the protection of personal information. The Family Relations Registration Act has institutionalized various kinds of certificates after several revisions, and subdivides the disclosure contents according to the requesting party. In this process, it can be said that the family relationship registration system has advanced in the direction of allowing only the minimum necessary disclosure in disclosing the information related to the identity. The problems caused by the disclosure of information about the individual identity are closely related to the life of the general public, so the issue of disclosure of the contents of the family register and the presentation of alternatives have been actively discussed. However, the result of the amendment of the Family Relations Registration Act seems to be inferior in terms of privacy protection. Even if the change of the perception of the family has been made, it should take utmost caution in terms of protection of personal information. First, it is subjective to judge whether or not the personal information to be concealed is confidential. If they do not want the disclosure, they will have to limit disclosure. Second, identity information with personal value is characterized by the fact that it is harder to recover than personal information with property value at the time of leakage. The consequences of personal information infringement are likely to be less likely to recover than any type of loss. Therefore, when collecting and using personal information about the individual, the state should gather only the necessary information and disclose the minimum information. Also, in the revision of the related laws, the protection of personal information should be prioritized rather than administrative efficiency or rationality.
Abstract
This study examines the implications of the protection of personal information in the family registration system, and examines the problems and related legislative changes discussed in relation to the protection of personal information in the Family Relations Registration Act. In addition, we reviewed the remedies for the remaining issues in the protection of personal information. The Family Relations Registration Act has institutionalized various kinds of certificates after several revisions, and subdivides the disclosure contents according to the requesting party. In this process, it can be said that the family relationship registration system has advanced in the direction of allowing only the minimum necessary disclosure in disclosing the information related to the identity. The problems caused by the disclosure of information about the individual identity are closely related to the life of the general public, so the issue of disclosure of the contents of the family register and the presentation of alternatives have been actively discussed. However, the result of the amendment of the Family Relations Registration Act seems to be inferior in terms of privacy protection. Even if the change of the perception of the family has been made, it should take utmost caution in terms of protection of personal information. First, it is subjective to judge whether or not the personal information to be concealed is confidential. If they do not want the disclosure, they will have to limit disclosure. Second, identity information with personal value is characterized by the fact that it is harder to recover than personal information with property value at the time of leakage. The consequences of personal information infringement are likely to be less likely to recover than any type of loss. Therefore, when collecting and using personal information about the individual, the state should gather only the necessary information and disclose the minimum information. Also, in the revision of the related laws, the protection of personal information should be prioritized rather than administrative efficiency or rationality.
참고문헌 (24)
- 권건보, "EU GDPR 제정 과정 및 그 이후 입법동향에 관한 연구", 미국헌법연구, 29(1), pp.1~38 (2018), 미국헌법학회
- 김기영, "가족관계등록법에 관한 검토", 원광법학, 25(3), pp.81~108 (2009), 법학연구소
- 김상용, "가족관계등록법의 문제점과 개정방향", 法學論文集, 38(2), pp.33~100 (2014), 법학연구원[DOI]
- 김상용, "가족법연구II" (2006), 법문사
- 가족관계등록부 공시제도 개선방안, "김상용", 법무부, ~ (2014)
- 김주수, "친족·상속법" (2017), 법문사
- 김진우, "현행 호적공개제도의 문제점에 관한 고찰", 법조, 통권 : 527 (2000)
- 문흥안, "가족관계등록법의 문제점 및 그 개선방안 -신분등록제도의 개편을 중심으로-", 법학논총, 20(1), pp.301~335 (2013), 법학연구원
- 文興安, "현행 호적공개제도의 비판적 검토", 중앙법학, 4(1), pp.1~18 (2002), 중앙법학회
- 문흥안, "현대민법의 전망(범주 서영배박사 회갑기념논문집)" (1995), 경상대학교 법학연구소
- 2008년부터 달라지는 가족법 가족관계등록법 해설, "박복순", 여성정책연구원, ~ (2007)
- 법원행정처, "호적선례요지집 제4권", ~ (1996)
- 법원행정처, "호적선례요지집 제1권", ~ (1980)
- 송효진, "가족관계등록제도의 개선방안 연구―전문가조사결과를 중심으로―", 가족법연구, 28(2), pp.113~156 (2014), 한국가족법학회
- 임규철, "가족관계등록법상의 형제자매의 증명서 열람청구를 통한 개인정보자기결정권의 제한 유무", 비교법연구, 16(3) (2016)
- 임규철, "개인정보자기결정권과 호적법", 인권과 정의, (330), pp.160~173 (2004), 대한변호사협회[DOI]
- 임규철, "유럽연합과 독일의 개인정보보호법의 비판적 수용을 통한 우리나라의 개인정보보호법의 입법개선을 위한 소고", 법학논고, (61), pp.81~115 (2018), 법학연구원[DOI]
- 전혜정, "가족관계등록부와 프라이버시 보호", 아세아여성법학, 11 (2008), 아세아여성법학연구소
- 정하명, "정보공개제도에서 개인정보보호에 관한 논의의 발전 ― 한국과 미국에서의 정보공개에서 개인정보보호를 중심으로 ―", 공법연구, 42(3), pp.31~51 (2014), 한국공법학회
- 정현수, "가족관계등록법의 문제점과 과제", 가족법연구, 22(3), pp.265~304 (2008), 한국가족법학회
- 정현수, "개정호적법상의 개인정보보호에 관한 연구 - 개정호적법상의 문제점을 중심으로 하여-", 비교사법, 9(4), pp.~39 (2002), 한국사법학회
- 조대현, "호주제도의 폐지와 호적의 편제", 법조, 통권 : 469 (1995)
