제1, 2차 한국근로환경조사: 한국과 EU회원국의 비교
First and Second Korean Working Conditions Survey: A Comparison between South Korea and EU Countries
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: In this study, I am going to figure out Korean workers’ actual exposure to risk factors and percentageof the workers who complain of health problems by performing a comparative analysis of the characteristics ofthe workers and working conditions in Korea and EU. Methods: The data used in this study includes the 1st workingconditions survey conducted in 2006 in Korea, the 2nd working conditions survey in 2010, the 4th EU working conditionssurvey, and the 5th EU working conditions survey. I have compared the changes to Korean working conditionsand those to EU working conditions in the categories of demographic characteristics, quality of labor, exposureto risk factors, and health problems included in the data. Results: The analysis of the characteristics ofthe demographic characters of Korean workers shows that aged and female workers register increased labor forceparticipation. The analysis of labor quality shows that Korea has a long working time but with a lower work intensitycompared to the countries included in EU working conditions survey. As for risk factors, Korea registers a lowlevel of exposure as compared to countries included in EU working conditions survey and characteristically showsa decreasing exposure to tobacco smoke. The survey shows sharply increasing complaints of muscle pain in theupper and lower limbs. Conclusion: In this study, I have identified vulnerable social groups by using quantifiedvalues in a comparison of the working conditions of Korea and those of EU.
Abstract
Purpose: In this study, I am going to figure out Korean workers’ actual exposure to risk factors and percentageof the workers who complain of health problems by performing a comparative analysis of the characteristics ofthe workers and working conditions in Korea and EU. Methods: The data used in this study includes the 1st workingconditions survey conducted in 2006 in Korea, the 2nd working conditions survey in 2010, the 4th EU working conditionssurvey, and the 5th EU working conditions survey. I have compared the changes to Korean working conditionsand those to EU working conditions in the categories of demographic characteristics, quality of labor, exposureto risk factors, and health problems included in the data. Results: The analysis of the characteristics ofthe demographic characters of Korean workers shows that aged and female workers register increased labor forceparticipation. The analysis of labor quality shows that Korea has a long working time but with a lower work intensitycompared to the countries included in EU working conditions survey. As for risk factors, Korea registers a lowlevel of exposure as compared to countries included in EU working conditions survey and characteristically showsa decreasing exposure to tobacco smoke. The survey shows sharply increasing complaints of muscle pain in theupper and lower limbs. Conclusion: In this study, I have identified vulnerable social groups by using quantifiedvalues in a comparison of the working conditions of Korea and those of EU.
참고문헌 (23)
- Adams, P. E., "Summary health statistics for the US population : National Health Interview Survey, 2010", Vital and Health Statistics, 10(251), pp.1~117 (2011)
- American Association for Public Opinion Research, "Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys (3rd ed.)" (2004), Lenexa, Kansas
- Chung, D. K., "The Korean economy beyond the crisis" (2004), Edward Elgar Publishing
- Cuñat, A., "Volatility, labor market flexibility, and the pattern of comparative advantage", Journal of the European Economic Association, 10(2), pp.225~254 (2012)
- Eichengreen, B., "Harvard east asian monographs. From miracle to maturity : The growth of the korean economy" (2012), Harvard University Press
- Fifth European Working Conditions Survey - Overview report, "Eurofound", ~ (2010)
- "NUTS - Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics"[URL]
- Hwang, S. J., "The silent assassin, Working long hours", Federation of Korean Trade Unions, 485, pp.14~15 (2012)
- ILO., "Estimates and projections of the economically active population : 1980-2020" (2009), Author
- 정우진, "과잉노동하는 한국인: 근로시간 미스매치와 노동시간 조정욕구의 관련성", 창조와 혁신, 7(2), pp.225~266 (2014), 피터드러커 소사이어티
- 신원성, "호텔 조리종사자의 인지된 노동강도, 직무스트레스가 피로도에 미치는 영향", 관광연구저널, 26(6), pp.221~239 (2012), 한국관광연구학회
- 김인아, "일부 조선업 노동자의 근골격계 증상과 스트레스 및 노동강도의 관련성", Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 16(4), pp.401~412 (2004), 대한직업환경의학회
- Lee, K. Y., "Changes and Characteristics in the Structure of Labor Market Supply and Policy" (2003), Daegu University
- Lee, S. M., "South Korea: From the land of morning calm to ICT hotbed", The Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), pp.7~18 (2003)
- Lee, Y. J., "Reality of the korean industrialization and its virtual image", Korean Sociological Association, 32(3), pp.561~589 (1998)
- 이윤근, "자동차 조립 작업에서의 노동 조건 변화와 근골격계질환과의 관련성", 한국산업보건학회지, 16(3), pp.276~283 (2006), 한국산업보건학회
- Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, "Second Korean Working Conditions Survey: A Comparison between South Korea and EU Countries" (2010), Author
- Park, T. J., "Effects of the long hours working on the work and conflict of life-A life condition survey of Hyundai Motor Co. workers", Korean Association of Lobor Studies, 17(2), pp.277~308 (2011)
- Seguino, S., "The effects of structural change and economic liberalisation on gender wage differentials in South Korea and Taiwan", Cambridge Journal of Economics, 24(4), pp.437~459 (2000)
- Son, Y. H., "Impact on Korea's industrialization and labor welfare system", Sogang University, 12(2), pp.162~183 (2004)
- 송윤희, "일부 증권 노동자의 우울증상과 스트레스 및 노동 강도의 상관성", Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 20(4), pp.283~294 (2008), 대한직업환경의학회
- Virtanen, M., "From insecure to secure employment : Changes in work, health, health related behaviours, and sickness absence", Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 60(12), pp.948~953 (2003)
- Walters, D., "The challenge of change for strategies on health and safety at work in the 21st century", Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 3(2), pp.3~20 (2005)