본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Reconsideration of the Development of Rating Criteria in Operational Language Testing Contexts

Consideration of Operational Language Testing Contexts

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This paper attempts to explain why the rating criteria for English language oral proficiency tests should be reconsidered and how the perceptions of rating criteria could be applied to language assessment. It introduces the needs of World Englishes (WEs) and their perspectives on the issue of English language testing in Korea, and shows different perceptions of rating criteria for the assessment of English language oral proficiency among three different groups of English teachers: native English teachers in Canada, non-native English teachers in the Philippines, and non-native English teachers in China. This study shows the complex relationships among English teachers’ language backgrounds, perceptions of rating criteria, task types, and their actual rating behaviors. It then focuses on the implications for language assessment of non-native speakers’ English language oral proficiency.

Abstract

This paper attempts to explain why the rating criteria for English language oral proficiency tests should be reconsidered and how the perceptions of rating criteria could be applied to language assessment. It introduces the needs of World Englishes (WEs) and their perspectives on the issue of English language testing in Korea, and shows different perceptions of rating criteria for the assessment of English language oral proficiency among three different groups of English teachers: native English teachers in Canada, non-native English teachers in the Philippines, and non-native English teachers in China. This study shows the complex relationships among English teachers’ language backgrounds, perceptions of rating criteria, task types, and their actual rating behaviors. It then focuses on the implications for language assessment of non-native speakers’ English language oral proficiency.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Bachman,L.F., "Statistical analyses for language assessment" (2004), Cambridge University Press
  2. Bachman, L. F., "Investigating variability in tasks and rater judgements in a performance test of foreign language speaking", Language Testing, 12, pp.238~257 (1995)
  3. Baik,M.J., "Language shift and identity in Korea", Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 3(1), pp.12~31 (1992)
  4. Elder, C., "Assessing English as a lingua franca", Annual Review of Applied linguistics, 26, pp.282~301 (2006)
  5. Fulcher,G., "Testing Second Language Speaking" (2003), Pearson
  6. Hoyt,W.T., "Rater bias in psychological research: When is it a problem and what can we do about it?", Psychological Methods, 5, pp.64~86 (2000)
  7. Kachru,B.B., "The Alchemy of English: the spread, functions and models of non-native Englishes" (1986), Pergamon Institute of English
  8. Kane,M., "An Argument-based approach to validity", Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), pp.527~535 (1992)
  9. Kang,S., "Seoul schools may hire Asian English teachers. Retrieved January 16, 2008, from http:", www, pp.news, special
  10. Kim,H., "Influence of English language teachers’ attitudes toward world Englishes on English language assessment", Foreign Language Education, 14(4), pp.207~228 (2007)
  11. Lumley, T., "Rater characteristics and rater bias: implications for training", Language Testing, 12, pp.54~71 (1995)
  12. McNamara,T.F., "Measuring Second language performance" (1996), Addison Wesley Longman
  13. McNamara, T. F, "Language Testing: The Social Dimension" (2006), Blackwell Publishing
  14. Messick,S., "Validity In Educational measurement", pp.13~103 (1989), American Council on Education and Macmillan.
  15. Messick, S., "Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from person's responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning", American Psychologist, 50, pp.741~749 (1995)
  16. Myford, C. M, "Detecting and measuring rater effects using many-faceted Rasch measurement: Part I", Journal of Applied Measurement, 4, pp.386~422 (2003)
  17. North,B., "The Development of a common framework scale of language proficiency", Lang, ~ (2000)
  18. Plough,I., "Interlocutor and task familarity:Effect on interactional structure.In Tasks and language Learning:Integrating Theory and Practice", pp.35~56 (1993), Multilingual Matters
  19. Seidlhofer, B., "Closing a conceptual gap: The case for a description of English as a lingua franca", International journal of Applied linguistics, 11, pp.133~158 (2001)
  20. Shim,R., "Changing attitudes toward TEWOL in Korea", Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 12(1), pp.143~158 (2002)
  21. Skehan,P, "Tasks and language performance assessment.In Researching pedagogic tasks second language learning,teaching and testing, Essex; Pearson Education Limited", 167~185 (2001)
  22. Weir.C.J., "Language testing and validation: An evidence-based approach" (2005), Palgrave Macmillan

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)