The Role of Topicality in Subject Selection
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The problem of subject selection is one of the frequently discussed topics concerning the lexical semantics-syntax interface. In the present article we have critically reviewed three representative approaches: the thematic hierarchy approach, Randall’s (2010) lexical decomposition approach, and Dowty’s proto-role approach. Dowty’s (1991) analysis seems to have greater explanatory power than the other two, but it is far from satisfactory in that it cannot account for subject selection in sentences containing symmetrical predicates or location subject predicates. Building upon the observations by Levin and Rappaport Hovav (2005), Wunderlich (2006), and Dowty (2000), we have claimed that topicality of an argument plays a crucial role in subject selection when the two coarguments have (almost) the same number of proto-role entailments and that the semantic idiosyncrasies of the location subject sentence are attributable to the topical nature of its subject, not to the polysemous nature of the predicate, as Dowty (2000) claims.
Abstract
The problem of subject selection is one of the frequently discussed topics concerning the lexical semantics-syntax interface. In the present article we have critically reviewed three representative approaches: the thematic hierarchy approach, Randall’s (2010) lexical decomposition approach, and Dowty’s proto-role approach. Dowty’s (1991) analysis seems to have greater explanatory power than the other two, but it is far from satisfactory in that it cannot account for subject selection in sentences containing symmetrical predicates or location subject predicates. Building upon the observations by Levin and Rappaport Hovav (2005), Wunderlich (2006), and Dowty (2000), we have claimed that topicality of an argument plays a crucial role in subject selection when the two coarguments have (almost) the same number of proto-role entailments and that the semantic idiosyncrasies of the location subject sentence are attributable to the topical nature of its subject, not to the polysemous nature of the predicate, as Dowty (2000) claims.
참고문헌 (32)
- Aarts,B, "English syntax and argumentation. 2nd ed" (2001), Palgrave
- Baker,M, "Incorporation" (1988), University of Chicago Press
- Bolinger,D, "Meaning and form" (1977), Longman
- Chomsky,N, "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
- Cohen, A., "Topic, focus, and the interpretation of bare plurals", Natural Language Semantics, 10, pp.125~165 (2002)
- Croft,W, "Event structure in argument linking. In The projection of arguments: Lexical and syntactic constraints", pp.21~63 (1998), CSLI Publications
- Dowty,D.R, "Word meaning and Montague Grammar" (1979), Reidel
- Dowty,D.R, "Thematic proto-roles and argument selection", Language, 67, pp.547~619 (1991)
- Dowty,D.R, "‘The garden swarms with bees’ and the fallacy of ‘argument alternation.’ In Polysemy: Theoretical and computational approach" (2000), Oxford University Press
- Erteschik-Shir,N, "The dynamics of focus structure" (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Fillmore,C.J, "The case for case. In Universals in linguistic theory", pp.1~88 (1968), Holt, Rinehart, and Winston
- Fillmore,C.J, "Types of lexical information. In Semantics", pp.370~392 (1971), Cambridge University Press
- Givón,T, "Syntax: A functional-typological introduction" (1984), John Benjamins
- Grimshaw.J, "Argument structure" (1990), MIT Press
- Hale, K. L., "On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The view from Building 20", pp.53~109 (1993), MIT Press
- Hale, K. L., "Prolegomena to a theory of argument structure" (2002), MIT Press
- Jackendoff,R, "Semantic structures" (1990), MIT Press
- Jespersen,O, "Essentials of English grammar" (1933), George Allen and Unwin
- Kearns,K, "Semantics" (2000), Palgrave Macmillan
- Kuno,S, "Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English", Linguistic Inquiry, 3, pp.269~320 (1972)
- Kuno,S, "Functional syntax: Anaphora, discourse and empathy" (1987), University of Chicago Press
- Lambrecht,K, "Information structure and sentence forms" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Levin, B., "Argument realization" (2005), Cambridge University Press
- Levin, B., "Lexical conceptual structure. In Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning" (2005), Mouton de Gruyter
- Randall,J.H, "Linking: The geometry of argument structure" (2010), Springer
- Rappaport Hovav, M., "Deconstructing thematic hierarchies. Ms", ~ (2004)
- Reinhart,T, "Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics", Philosophica, 27, pp.53~93 (1981)
- Takami,K, "Preposition stranding: From syntactic to functional analysis" (1992), Mouton de Gruyter
- Van Valin,R.D.,Jr, "A synopsis of Role and Reference Grammar. In Advances in Role and Reference Grammar", pp.1~164 (1993), John Benjamins
- Van Valin,R.D.,Jr, "Semantic macroroles in Role and Reference Grammar. In Semantische rollen", pp.62~82 (2006), Narr
- Vendler,Z, "Linguistics in philosophy" (1967), Cornell University Press
- Wunderlich,D, "Argument hierarchy and other factors determining argument realization. In Semantic role universals and argument linking: Theoretical, typological, and psycholinguistic perspectives", pp.15~52 (2006), Mouton de Gruyter