본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

TOEIC 듣기평가에서 대학생 영어학습자가 사용한 듣기전략

On Listening Strategies Used in TOEIC Listening Test of Korean College Students

임운
대한영어영문학회 (The Association of English Language and Literature in Korea)|2011.06|영어영문학연구 (Studies in English Language & Literature)|제53권 제2호|pp. 233-255|DOI 10.18853/jjell.2011.53.2.013

1

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

보상기억상위인지memorycompensationcognitiveaffective인지적listening strategymetacognitive정의적듣기전략
주제분류영어와문학

초록

The purpose of this study is to examine how much college students used listening strategies in their TOEIC listening test. Data was collected from 84 Korean college students who took TOEIC test in the second term of 2010, and a questionnaire was used as the tool for this study. The major findings of this study include: First, college English learners used listening strategies, an average of 3.02, which was almost the same average of 3.0. Second, they used listening strategies above the average related to metacognitive strategy, memory strategy, and compensational strategy, but the use of affective and cogntive strategies was below the average. These results mean that they used memory strategy to memorize what they heard, used compensational strategy to compensate for what they did not hear, and used metacognitive strategy to plan and control their problem-solving process. But they did not use the other listening strategy commonly. This study illustrates the importance of using strategies in TOEIC listening test. It will be also helpful for English teachers in college to understand what kind of strategies were used in TOEIC listening test and the importance of teaching listening strategies. If teachers introduce unfamiliar listening strategies which were not found to be commonly used by the students from this study, the strategy instruction could be more effective for the development of the college students’ listening abilities.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine how much college students used listening strategies in their TOEIC listening test. Data was collected from 84 Korean college students who took TOEIC test in the second term of 2010, and a questionnaire was used as the tool for this study. The major findings of this study include: First, college English learners used listening strategies, an average of 3.02, which was almost the same average of 3.0. Second, they used listening strategies above the average related to metacognitive strategy, memory strategy, and compensational strategy, but the use of affective and cogntive strategies was below the average. These results mean that they used memory strategy to memorize what they heard, used compensational strategy to compensate for what they did not hear, and used metacognitive strategy to plan and control their problem-solving process. But they did not use the other listening strategy commonly. This study illustrates the importance of using strategies in TOEIC listening test. It will be also helpful for English teachers in college to understand what kind of strategies were used in TOEIC listening test and the importance of teaching listening strategies. If teachers introduce unfamiliar listening strategies which were not found to be commonly used by the students from this study, the strategy instruction could be more effective for the development of the college students’ listening abilities.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. 김동규, "메모하기 전략이 EFL 대학생들의 영어 듣기 능력에 미치는 영향", 현대영어교육, 9(2), pp.110~126 (2008), 현대영어교육학회
  2. 김동규, "ESL 학습자들의 국가 지역별 영어듣기 전략 비교 분석", 현대영어교육, 11(2), pp.128~147 (2010), 현대영어교육학회
  3. 박기표, "문제의 제시 방법과 문제의 종류가 청해에 미치는 영향", 영어교육, 55(1), pp.141~156 (2000)
  4. 박기표, "언어 능력,배경 지식,문제의 종류가 영어 청해 능력에 미치는 영향", 영어교육, 56(2), pp.245~264 (2001)
  5. 박기표, "영어지식과 듣기전략의 사용이 영어 듣기능력에 미치는 영향", 영어교육연구, 14(1), pp.97~114 (2002), 팬코리아영어교육학회
  6. 임미란, "대학생들의 태도와 듣기전략이 영어 듣기 숙달도에 미치는 영향", 영어영문학21, 22(3), pp.187~210 (2009), 21세기영어영문학회
  7. 정혜진, "영어 듣기 능숙도와 듣기 전략 사용에 관한 연구", 영어교육연구, 18(3), pp.253~277 (2006), 팬코리아영어교육학회
  8. 정혜진, "대학생 영어 학습자의 듣기 학습전략 사용에 관한 연구", 영상영어교육(STEM Journal), 7(1), pp.167~190 (2006), 영상영어교육학회
  9. Anderson, A, "Listening" (1988), Oxford University Press
  10. Asher,J, "The Total Physical Response Approach to Second Language Learning", The Modern Language Journal, 53, pp.57~61 (1969)
  11. Asher, J., "Learning a Second Language Through Commands: The Second Field Test", Modern Language Journal, 58, pp.24~32 (1974)
  12. Bacon,S.M, "A Study of the Attitudes, Motives, and Strategies of University Foreign Language Students and their Disposition to Authentic Oral and Written Input", The Modern Language Journal, 74(4), pp.459~473 (1990)
  13. Brown,H.D, "Principles of Language Learning and Teaching" (1994), Prentice Hall Regents
  14. Carrel, P. L., "Metacognitive Strategy Training for ESL Reading", TESOL Quarterly, 23, pp.647~678 (1989)
  15. Chamot, A. U, "The Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach: A Bridge to the Mainstream", TESOL Quarterly, 21(2), pp.227~249 (1987)
  16. Gary, J, "Talking may be Dangler to your Linguistic Health", IRAL, 19(1), pp.1~14 (1981)
  17. Krashen, S, "The Natural Approach:Language Acquisition in the Classroom" (1983), Pergamon & Alemany
  18. Littlewood,W, "Communicative Language Teaching" (1981), Cambridge University Press
  19. Foreign Language Listening Comprehension Lesson, In A Guide to the Teaching of Second Language Listening, "Applying Learning Strategies in the Second", pp.1995, Mendelsohn,D.J
  20. O’Malley. J., "Learning Strategy Applications with Students of English as a Second Language", TESOL Quarterly, 19, pp.285~296 (1985)
  21. Oxford,R.L, "Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know", pp.1990, Newbury House
  22. Park,G.P, "Relationship between Listening Strategy Use and Listening Ability", English Teaching, 52(2), pp.95~112 (1997)
  23. Peterson,P, "A Synthesis of Methods for Interactive Listening, In Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language", pp.106~122 (1991), Newbury House
  24. Rivers,W.M, "Listening Comprehension.Teaching Foreign Language Skills" (1968), Chicago University Press
  25. River, W, "A Principal Guide to the Teaching of English as a Second Language" (1978), Oxford University Press
  26. Rubin.J, "Can Strategy Instruction Improve Listening Comprehension", Foreign Language Annals, 29, pp.331~342 (1996)
  27. Rubin.J, "Learner Strategies: Theoretical Assumptions, Research History and Typology, In Learner Strategies in Language Learning", pp.15~30 (1987), Prentice-Hall International
  28. Shrum, J. L, "Teacher’s Handbook:Contextualized Language Instruction" (1994), Heinle & Heinle
  29. A Study of EFL Listening Comprehension Strategies, "Teng,H.C", ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service, ~, pp.ED 422 745 (1988)
  30. Vandergrift,L, "Facilitating Second Language Listening Comprehension: Acquiring Successful Strategies", ELT Journal, 53, pp.168~176 (1999)
  31. Vann, R. J, "Strategies of Unsuccessful Language Learners", TESOL Quarterly, 24(2), pp.177~198 (1990)
  32. Winitz, H., "A Test of Reading Following Comprehension Training", International Review of Applied Linguistics, 15(4), pp.307~319 (1979)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)

On Modality in English강승만pp. 1-14A Cognitive-Functional Account for Relative Clauses in Discourse김경열pp. 15-31초등학교에서의 영어원어민 교사와의 효과적인 협동수업: 우수학교 사례 중심으로김성중pp. 33-58「톰의 영관」과 G. M. 홉킨스의 사회사상김영남pp. 59-77영어의 애칭명사에 관한 연구김진두pp. 79-97
원문 보기