A Feature-based Approach for Addressee Honorification
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In English and Korean, addressee honorification is realized in the vocative construction. In the concept of Chomsky’s (1993, 1995) earlier version of Minimalist Program, checking is in the Spec-head relation between the subject and [uHon] of the subject-honorific marker si on T or between the vocative element and [uHon] on Voc. When the honorific vocative element appears in Korean, its corresponding verbal ending marker (e)yo occurs as a head of VocP. Other unchecked syntactic features, the residual unchecked honorific feature percolates up to higher level, let’s say, to Voc, head of VocP to discharge the unchecked feature for the vocative elements such as caney, Kim sepang, or a pen name, which induces the so-called si addressee honorification (i.e., si politeness). In English. Force on C triggers addressee honorification in that the unchecked honorific feature on C percolates up to Voc and discharges its feature in the Spec-head relation with the vocative element in Spec-Voc. The vocative element must appear overtly or covertly. The source of the unchecked honorific feature percolating up to Voc is C in English or T in si addressee honorification of Korean. The addressee honorific marker (e)yo is on Voc from which it discharges its honorific feature.
Abstract
In English and Korean, addressee honorification is realized in the vocative construction. In the concept of Chomsky’s (1993, 1995) earlier version of Minimalist Program, checking is in the Spec-head relation between the subject and [uHon] of the subject-honorific marker si on T or between the vocative element and [uHon] on Voc. When the honorific vocative element appears in Korean, its corresponding verbal ending marker (e)yo occurs as a head of VocP. Other unchecked syntactic features, the residual unchecked honorific feature percolates up to higher level, let’s say, to Voc, head of VocP to discharge the unchecked feature for the vocative elements such as caney, Kim sepang, or a pen name, which induces the so-called si addressee honorification (i.e., si politeness). In English. Force on C triggers addressee honorification in that the unchecked honorific feature on C percolates up to Voc and discharges its feature in the Spec-head relation with the vocative element in Spec-Voc. The vocative element must appear overtly or covertly. The source of the unchecked honorific feature percolating up to Voc is C in English or T in si addressee honorification of Korean. The addressee honorific marker (e)yo is on Voc from which it discharges its honorific feature.
참고문헌 (30)
- Aarts, B., "English Syntax and Argumentation" (2013), Palgrave Macmillan
- Beckman, M. E, "Intonational Structure in Japanese and English", Phonology Yearbook, 3, pp.255~309 (1986)
- Brown, P, "Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- 최재웅, "Obligatory Honorification and the Honorific Feature*", 생성문법연구, 14(4), pp.545~559 (2004), 한국생성문법학회
- Chomsky, N, "The View from Building", pp.1~52 (1993), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program, Current Studies in Linguistics 28" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "Structures and Beyond", pp.104~131 (2004), Oxford University Press
- Chomsky, N, "Three Factors in Language Design", Linguistic Inquiry, 36, pp.1~22 (2005)
- Chung, I., "Paradox of Negative and Honorific Morphology in Korean", Proceedings of the 9th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar, pp.205~228 (2007)
- Chung, I, "Suppletive Negation in Korean and Distributed Morphology", Lingua, 117, pp.95~148 (2007)
- Hong, S., "Inquiries into Korean Linguistics IV", pp.111~124 (2011), Taehak Publishing House
- 홍성심, "Feature-based Honorifics and Politeness in English and Korean at a Syntax-Pragmatics Interface", 생성문법연구, 23(2), pp.199~219 (2013), 한국생성문법학회
- Hwang, M, "Origins of 2nd Person Pronoun ‘caney’", Korean Linguistics, 37, pp.197~218 (2001)
- Kashyap, A. K., "On Honorifics", Proceedings of International Systematic Functional Congress 35: Voices around the World, pp.201~206 (2008)
- Kim, R, "On the Korean Vocative NP and Its Corresponding Verbal Ending Mark", Korean Linguistics, 16, pp.255~283 (2002)
- 고성환, "호격 구성의 기능과 화용적 특성 및 연결 제약", 한국어 의미학, 18, pp.217~242 (2005), 한국어의미학회
- Lakoff, R, "Language in Context", Language, 48(4) (1972)
- 이두원, "Vocative Construction and Addressee Honorification", 언어학 연구, (18), pp.151~172 (2010), 한국중원언어학회
- Lee, D. -W., "Use of Addressee Honorification Marker Yo in Wh-Questions and Fragments", Proceedings of the Spring Conference of The Mirae English and Literature Society, pp.105~116 (2014)
- Lee, I, "The Korean Language" (2000), State University of New York Press
- 이정식, "Approximate Cleft and Its Implication for Copula Overuse", 생성문법연구, 23(3), pp.603~614 (2013), 한국생성문법학회
- Leech, G, "Towards and anatomy of politeness in communication", International Journal of Pragmatics, 14, pp.101~123 (2003)
- Ng, S, "Power in Language: Verbal Communication and Social Influence" (1993), Sage Publications
- 오치성, "Two Types of Honorification for Addressee in Korean: -si vs. -(e)yo", (su)pnita, 2010, pp.(17), 117~141[DOI]
- Rizzi, L, "Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax", pp.281~337 (1997), Foris
- Rizzi, L, "The Structure of CP and IP", pp.3~15 (2004), Oxford University Press
- Ryu, D. -S., "Kwukeuy maykaypyenin mwunpep (Korean pragmatic grammar)", 박사, pp.1993
- Sew, J., "Power Pragmatics in Asian Languages", Language and Science, 19(4), pp.357~367 (1997)
- Shibatani, M, "Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics", pp.381~390 (2006)
- Sohn, H. -M., "The Korean Language" (1999), Cambridge University Press