Controversial Issues in M. Butterfly
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Because of the multilayered nature of the text, M. Butterfly is Hwang’s most famous play and accounts for a majority of the scholarly works by him. Above all, this play puts forward three crucial, controversial questions related to gender, postcolonialism, and deconstruction matters: Does Song Liling subvert the stereotype of Asian women or weaken the image of Eastern masculinity? Is Gallimard gay? Does M. Butterfly deconstruct Orientalism? Hwang deliberately leaves these controversial questions open. After analyzing various critiques of the play, it appears that this play has limitations in subverting stereotypes of Asian women, because Hwang is stuck in the binary opposition of two stereotypes of Asian women. Second, Gallimard is not gay because of his desire to have a Madame Butterfly, his belief in the fact Song and he had a baby, and his genuine pain after realizing Song’s gender identity. Lastly, M. Butterfly attempts to subvert Orientalism, but failing to implement it. The failure is related to the author’s understanding of Chinese culture, his personal identity, and his utilitarian desire. Hence, this study examines how M. Butterfly reflects the dominant discourses of the late 20 th and early 21 st centuries which will subsequently strengthen the understanding of M. Butterfly.
Abstract
Because of the multilayered nature of the text, M. Butterfly is Hwang’s most famous play and accounts for a majority of the scholarly works by him. Above all, this play puts forward three crucial, controversial questions related to gender, postcolonialism, and deconstruction matters: Does Song Liling subvert the stereotype of Asian women or weaken the image of Eastern masculinity? Is Gallimard gay? Does M. Butterfly deconstruct Orientalism? Hwang deliberately leaves these controversial questions open. After analyzing various critiques of the play, it appears that this play has limitations in subverting stereotypes of Asian women, because Hwang is stuck in the binary opposition of two stereotypes of Asian women. Second, Gallimard is not gay because of his desire to have a Madame Butterfly, his belief in the fact Song and he had a baby, and his genuine pain after realizing Song’s gender identity. Lastly, M. Butterfly attempts to subvert Orientalism, but failing to implement it. The failure is related to the author’s understanding of Chinese culture, his personal identity, and his utilitarian desire. Hence, this study examines how M. Butterfly reflects the dominant discourses of the late 20 th and early 21 st centuries which will subsequently strengthen the understanding of M. Butterfly.
참고문헌 (20)
- Boles, William C., "Understanding David Henry Hwang" (2013), U of South Carolina P
- Chang, Williamson BC, "Bearing Dreams, Shaping Visions: Asian Pacific American Perspectives", pp.181~184 (1993)
- DiGaetani, John Louis, "‘M. Butterfly’: An Interview with David Henry Hwang", TDR, 33(3), pp.141~153 (1989)[DOI]
- Ding, Wenli, "Study On David Henry Hwang’s Incomplete Deconstruction of Orientalism in M. Butterfly", Journal of Xuzhou Normal University, 2, pp.42~45 (2007)
- Eng, David L., "In the Shadows of a Diva: Committing Homosexuality in David Henry Hwang’s M. Butterfly", Amerasia Journal, 20(1), pp.93~116 (1994)[DOI]
- Hwang, David Henry, "M. Butterfly: with an Afterward by The Playwright" (1993), Plume
- KIM KITAI, "Asian Americans in Harold and Kumar Go to White Castle: The Perpetual Foreigners", 영어영문학연구, 55(1), pp.47~64 (2013), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
- Kondo, Dorinne, "About Face: Performing Race in Fashion and Theater" (2014), Routledge
- Lee, Josephine, "Performing Asian America: Race and Ethnicity on the Contemporary Stage" (1997), Temple UP
- Lee, Quentin, "Between the Oriental and the Transvestite", Found Object, 2, pp.45~66 (1993)
- Lin, Hsiu-Chen, "Staging Orientalia: Dangerous ‘Authenticity’ in David Henry Hwang’s M. Butterfly", Journal of American Drama and Theatre, 9, pp.26~35 (1997)
- Lyons, Bonnie, "Making His Muscles Work for Himself: An Interview with David Henry Hwang", The Literary Review, 42, pp.230~244 (1999)
- Moy, James S., "Marginal Sights: Staging the Chinese in America Studies in Theatre History and Culture" (1993), U of Iowa P
- Moy, James S., "David Henry Hwang’s ‘M. Butterfly’ and Philip Kan Gotanda’s ‘Yankee Dawg You Die’: Repositioning Chinese American Marginality on the American Stage", Theatre Journal, 42(1), pp.48~56 (1990)[DOI]
- Rich, Frank, "M. Butterfly, a Story of a Strange Love, Conflict and Betrayal", New York Times 21, ~ (1988)
- Said, Edward W., "Culture and Imperialism" (2012), Vintage
- Shan, Dexing, "Cultural Attributes and Chinese-American literature" (1994), Institute of European and American Studies
- Shin, Andrew, "Projected Bodies in David Henry Hwang’s ‘M. Butterfly’ and ‘Golden Gate.’", Melus, 27(1), pp.177~197 (2002)[DOI]
- "Dragon Lady and Lotus Blossom: The Hyper-Sexualization of Asian Women" (2021)[URL]
- "The Yellow Skin and White Heart Seek Roots—Chinese playwright David Henry Hwang Return to Chinese Society" (2006)[URL]