Empirical Study of Dynamic Chinese Corporate Governance Based on Chinese-listed Firms with A Panel VAR Approach
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose – In this article, a dynamic model like a VAR is an appropriate choice for estimating the possible interrelationship between ownership structure and firm performance as a dynamic process. Research design, data, and methodology – Data of this work are collected from Chinese stock exchange including 350 Chinese-listed firms during the period of 1999-2012. We hypothesize that this interrelationship dynamically exists between ownership structure and firm performance. To examine the correlation, a panel Vector Auto-regression (PVAR) approach generated by GMM method is utilized to test the possible dynamic relation embedded in corporate governance. Another two dynamic analysis solutions such as orthogonalized impulse-response function and variance decomposition are also used simultaneously. Results – Findings of this study indicate the evidence that dynamically endogenous relationship exists between ownership structure and firm performance. Further, there is a dynamical correlation between investment and performance. Impulse response and variance decomposition illustrate that impact of a shock to variables themselves is the main source for their variability. Conclusions – The conclusion in this study is that there is a bidirectional and inter-temporal effect between proportion of ownership and corporate performance for a long run in accordance with impulse response function. Overall, our results suggest that corporate governance in China is more market oriented.
Abstract
Purpose – In this article, a dynamic model like a VAR is an appropriate choice for estimating the possible interrelationship between ownership structure and firm performance as a dynamic process. Research design, data, and methodology – Data of this work are collected from Chinese stock exchange including 350 Chinese-listed firms during the period of 1999-2012. We hypothesize that this interrelationship dynamically exists between ownership structure and firm performance. To examine the correlation, a panel Vector Auto-regression (PVAR) approach generated by GMM method is utilized to test the possible dynamic relation embedded in corporate governance. Another two dynamic analysis solutions such as orthogonalized impulse-response function and variance decomposition are also used simultaneously. Results – Findings of this study indicate the evidence that dynamically endogenous relationship exists between ownership structure and firm performance. Further, there is a dynamical correlation between investment and performance. Impulse response and variance decomposition illustrate that impact of a shock to variables themselves is the main source for their variability. Conclusions – The conclusion in this study is that there is a bidirectional and inter-temporal effect between proportion of ownership and corporate performance for a long run in accordance with impulse response function. Overall, our results suggest that corporate governance in China is more market oriented.
참고문헌 (47)
- Akaike, H., "A new look at the statistical model identification", IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-19(6), pp.716~723 (1974)
- Arellano, M., "Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error component models", Journal of Economics, 68(1), pp.29~51 (1995)
- Beetsma, R., "The effects of government purchase shocks: review and estimates for the EU", Economic Journal, 121(550), pp.F4~F32 (2011)
- Berdiev, A. N., "Financial development and the shadow economy: A panel VAR analysis", Economic Modelling, 57(C), pp.197~207 (2016)
- Boubtane, E., "Immigration, growth and unemployment: Panel VAR evidence from OECD countries", pp.399~420 (2010), Labour Press
- Caivano, M., "The transmission of shocks between the U.S. and the Euro area" (2006), Bank of Italy
- Canova, F., "Estimating overidentified, non-recursive, time varying coefficients, structural VARs" (2012), UPF manuscript
- Panel vector autoregressive models: A survey, "Canova, F.", ~, pp.Working Paper Series, No.1507 (2013)
- Cheung, W. K. A., "Insider ownership and corporate performance: Evidence from the adjustment cost approach", Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(5), pp.271~350 (2006)
- Cho, M., "Ownership structure, investment and the corporate value: An empirical analysis", Journal of Financial Economics, 47(1), pp.103~121 (1998)
- Choi, I., "Unit Root Tests for Panel Data", Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2), pp.249~272 (2001)
- Heterogeneity and cross-country spillovers in macroeconomic-financial linkages, "Ciccarelli, M.", ECB, ~ (2012)
- Cui, H., "The relationship between managerial ownership and firm performance in high R&D firms", Journal of Corporate Finance, 8(4), pp.313~336 (2002)
- Davidson, W. N., "Ownership concentration and corporate performance: A causal analysis with Japanese panel data", Corporate Governance, 70(1), pp.1~16 (2004)
- Davies, D., "Ownership structure, managerial behaviour and corporate value", Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(4), pp.645~660 (2005)
- Delios, A., "Within-country product diversification and foreign subsidiary performance", Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), pp.706~724 (2008)
- Demsetz, H., "Ownership structure and corporate performance", Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(3), pp.209~233 (2001)
- Devereux, M., "Asymmetric Information, Corporate Finance and Investment", pp.279~306 (1990), The University of Chicago Press
- Earle, J. S., "Ownership concentration and corporate performance on the Budapest Stock Exchange: Do too many cooks spoil the goulash", Corporate Governance, 13(2), pp.254~264 (2005)
- Enders, W., "Applied Econometric Time Series" (2003), Wiley
- Erkens, D. H., "Corporate governance in the 2007–2008 financial crisis: evidence from financial institutions worldwide", Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(2), pp.389~411 (2012)
- Fahlenbrach, R., "Managerial ownership dynamics and firm value", Journal of Financial Economics, 92(3), pp.342~361 (2009)
- Fuxiu, J., "Corporate governance in China: A modern perspective", Journal of Corporate Finance, 32, pp.190~216 (2015)
- Hannan, E. J., "The Estimation of the Order of an ARMA Process", Annals of Statistics, 8(5), pp.1071~1081 (1980)
- Hannan, E. J., "The determination of the order of an autoregression", Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 41, pp.190~195 (1979)
- Himmelberg, C. P., "Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance", Journal of Financial Economics, 53(3), pp.353~384 (1999)
- Im, K. S., "Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels", Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), pp.53~74 (2003)
- Iturriaga, F. J. L., "Ownership structure, corporate value and firm investment: A simultaneous equations analysis of Spanish companies", Journal of Management and Governance, 5(2), pp.179~204 (2001)
- Jensen, M., "Theory of the firm:managerial behaviours, agency cost and ownership structure", Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), pp.305~360 (1976)
- Levine, A, "Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite sample properties", Journal of Economics, 57, pp.265~301 (2002)
- Liu, N. Y., "Domestic and foreign institutional investor behavior in China", European Journal of Finance, 20(7-9), pp.728~751 (2014)
- Love, I., "Financial development and financing constraints: International evidence from the structural investment model", Review of Financial Studies, 16(3), pp.765~791 (2003)
- Love, L., "Financial development and dynamic investment behavior: Evidence from panel VAR", The Quarterly Review of Economic and Finance, 46(2), pp.190~210 (2006)
- Madala, G., "A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test", Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1), pp.631~652 (1999)
- Mc Connell, J., "Corporate investment expenditure decisions and the market value of the firm", Journal of Financial Economics, 14(3), pp.399~422 (1985)
- Nickell, S., "Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects", Econometrica, 49(6), pp.1417~1426 (1981)
- Nguyen, T., "A dynamic estimation of governance structures and financial performance for Singaporean companies", Economic Modelling, 40(C), pp.1~11 (2014)
- Park, K., "Insider ownership and firm performance: An examination of restaurant firms", International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(3), pp.448~458 (2010)
- Ramirez, C. D., "Did J. P. Morgan’s Men add liquidity? Corporate Investment, Cash Flow, and Financial Structure at the Turn of the Twentieth Century", Journal of Finance, 50(2), pp.661~678 (1995)
- Ramey, V., "Costly investment reallocation and the effects of government spending", Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 48(1), pp.145~194 (1998)
- Schwarz, G., "Estimating the dimension of a model", The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), pp.461~464 (1978)
- Schwert, G. W., "Tests for Unit Roots: A Monte Carlo Investigation", Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 7(2), pp.147~160 (1989)
- Sim, C., "Macroeconomics and Reality", Econometrica, 48(1), pp.1~48 (1980)
- Thomsen, S., "Blockholder ownership: Effects on firm value in market and control based governance systems", Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(2), pp.246~269 (2006)
- Wintoki, B., "Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance", Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), pp.581~606 (2012)
- Yabei, H., "The relationship between ownership and performance: A review of theory and evidence", International Business Research, 1(4), pp.72~81 (2008)
- Zhou, Y., "Empirical research of ownership structure and corporate performance based on the perspective of dynamic endogeneity", Energy Procedia, 5(1), pp.1878~1884 (2011)
