본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Effects of Information Processing Types and Product Ownership on Usage Intention

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose - Current research aimed at exploring the effect differences between the two types of processing product information such as the imagining and the considering on psychological product ownership which could influence the intent to purchase or use the product, and focused on identifying the interaction effects of activated memory information type and advertising information type on each of the information processing types. Research design, data, and methodology – This study divided the information processing types into imagining and considering, and the consumer‟s memories were divided into autobiographical or episodic and semantic memory. The advertising information was approached in each of event information being together with the product and product feature information. At empirical study, 2(two types of memory activation: episodic and semantic memory activation) * 2(two types of advertising information: event-focused and product feature-focused advertising information) between-subjects design was used to make four types of questionnaire according to the type of experimental groups. Through the survey platform, „questionnaire stars‟ of „WeChat‟ in China, 219 questionnaire data were collected for empirical study. The structural equation model in AMOS 26 and Anova were used to verify hypotheses. Results - First, the ownership affected the usage intent positively. Second, the imagining did not affect the psychological ownership but did directly affect the usage intention, and the considering affected the ownership positively. Third, the episodic memory activation positively influenced the imagining and negatively affected the considering, whereas the semantic memory activation positively influenced the considering and negatively affected the imagining. Fourth, event-advertising information increased the effects of the activated episodic memory on the imagining, and feature-advertising information increased the effects of the activated semantic memory on the considering. Conclusions - marketers should develop and advertise their product-related event message to trigger the imaging that directly increase the intent to purchase or use their product, when consumers are under the activation of their episodic memory. And marketers should advertise their product feature-related message to trigger the considering that could induce consumers‟ ownership for their product to increase the intent to purchase or use their product, when they are under the activation of their semantic memory.

Abstract

Purpose - Current research aimed at exploring the effect differences between the two types of processing product information such as the imagining and the considering on psychological product ownership which could influence the intent to purchase or use the product, and focused on identifying the interaction effects of activated memory information type and advertising information type on each of the information processing types. Research design, data, and methodology – This study divided the information processing types into imagining and considering, and the consumer‟s memories were divided into autobiographical or episodic and semantic memory. The advertising information was approached in each of event information being together with the product and product feature information. At empirical study, 2(two types of memory activation: episodic and semantic memory activation) * 2(two types of advertising information: event-focused and product feature-focused advertising information) between-subjects design was used to make four types of questionnaire according to the type of experimental groups. Through the survey platform, „questionnaire stars‟ of „WeChat‟ in China, 219 questionnaire data were collected for empirical study. The structural equation model in AMOS 26 and Anova were used to verify hypotheses. Results - First, the ownership affected the usage intent positively. Second, the imagining did not affect the psychological ownership but did directly affect the usage intention, and the considering affected the ownership positively. Third, the episodic memory activation positively influenced the imagining and negatively affected the considering, whereas the semantic memory activation positively influenced the considering and negatively affected the imagining. Fourth, event-advertising information increased the effects of the activated episodic memory on the imagining, and feature-advertising information increased the effects of the activated semantic memory on the considering. Conclusions - marketers should develop and advertise their product-related event message to trigger the imaging that directly increase the intent to purchase or use their product, when consumers are under the activation of their episodic memory. And marketers should advertise their product feature-related message to trigger the considering that could induce consumers‟ ownership for their product to increase the intent to purchase or use their product, when they are under the activation of their semantic memory.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Anderson, J. R., "A spreading activation theory of memory", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, pp.261~295 (1983)
  2. Aron, A., "Close relationships as including other in the self", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, pp.241~253 (1991)
  3. Baumgartner, H., "Autobiographical memories, affect and consumer information processing", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1(1), pp.53~82 (1992)
  4. Baumgartner, T., "The emotional power of music : how music enhances the feeling of affective pictures", Brain research, 1075(1), pp.151~164 (2006)
  5. Beggan, J. K., "Association as a psychological justification for ownership", The Journal of Psychology : Interdisciplinary and Applied, 128(4), pp.365~380 (1994)
  6. Belk, R. W., "Possessions and the extended self", Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), pp.139~168 (1988)
  7. Bless, H., "Advances in Experimental Social Psychology", pp.319~373 (2010), Elsevier
  8. Brann, E. T., "The world of the imagination: Sum and substance" (1991), Rowman & Utttefield Publishers
  9. Brewer, W. F., "Autobiographical memory", pp.25~49 (1986), Cambridge University Press
  10. Brown, G., "Psychological ownership, territorial behavior, and being perceived as a team contributor: The critical role of trust in the work environment", Personnel Psychology, 67(2), pp.463~485 (2014)
  11. Buckner, R. L., "Self-projection and the brain", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, pp.49~57 (2007)
  12. Chiang, H. -H., "A multilevel investigation of relationships among brand-centered HRM, brand psychological ownership, brand citizenship behaviors, and customer satisfaction", European Journal of Marketing, 46(5), pp.626~662 (2012)
  13. Beet-Na Choi, "Impacts of Value Inclination and Self-Expressive Consuming Propensity upon Eco-Friendly Product Purchasing Intention", Asian Journal of Business Environment, 4(4), pp.39~49 (2014), 한국유통과학회
  14. 최낙환, "프라이드의 유형과 광고유형의 광고제품평가에 대한 상호작용효과", 유통과학연구, 13(5), pp.61~70 (2015), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  15. 최낙환, "Roles of Power State and Message Types on Restaurant Store Brand Attitude", 유통과학연구, 15(10), pp.5~14 (2017), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  16. Corballis, M. C., "From mating to mentality:Evaluating evolutionary psychology", pp.155~171 (2003), Psychology Press
  17. Escalas, J. E., "Imagine yourself in the product: Mental simulation, narrative transportation, and persuasion", Journal of Advertising, 33(2), pp.37~48 (2004)
  18. Essig, E., "Theoretical Orientations and Practical Applications of Psychological Ownership", pp.203~228 (2017), Springer International Publishing
  19. Gibbons, F. X., "Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23", pp.249~303 (1990), Academic Press
  20. Hoyer, W. D., "Consumer Behavior" (2013), Cengage Learning
  21. Huifeng, P., "Perceived risks and restaurant visit intentions in China: Do online customer reviews matter?", Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 43, pp.179~189 (2020)
  22. Kappes, H. B., "Mental simulation as substitute for experience", Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(7), pp.405~420 (2016)
  23. Kirk, C. P., "Property lines in the mind: Consumers‟ psychological ownership and their territorial responses", Journal of Consumer Research, 45(1), pp.148~168 (2018)
  24. Lamberton, C., "Ownership: A perennial prize or a fading goal? A curation, framework, and agenda for future research", Journal of Consumer Research, 47(2), pp.301~309 (2020)
  25. MacInnis, D. J., "The role of imagery in information processing: Review and extensions", Journal of Consumer Research, 13, pp.473~491 (1987)
  26. Peck, J., "In search of a surrogate for touch: The effect of haptic imagery on perceived ownership", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(2), pp.189~196 (2013)
  27. Peck, J., "Individual differences in haptic information processing: The “need for touch” scale", Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), pp.430~442 (2003)
  28. Peck, J., "The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership", Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), pp.434~447 (2009)
  29. Pezzulo, G., "Thinking as the control of imagination: A conceptual framework for goal-directed systems", Psychological Research, 73(4), pp.559~577 (2009)
  30. Pierce, J. L., "Psychological Ownership and the Organizational Context, Theory, Research Evidence and Application" (2011), Edward Elgar Publishing Limited
  31. Pierce, J. L., "The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research", Review of General Psychology, 7(1), pp.84~107 (2003)
  32. Reimann, M., "Handbook of Brand Relationships", pp.65~81 (2009), Sharpe
  33. Samuelsen, B. M., "Promising attributes and experiences", Journal of Advertising, 39, pp.65~77 (2010)
  34. Schacter, D. L., "Memory systems 1994" (1994), MIT Press
  35. Schlosser, A. E., "Experiencing products in the virtual world: The role of goal and imagery influencing attitudes versus purchase intentions", Journal of Consumer Research, 30, pp.184~198 (2003)
  36. Schneider, W., "Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search and attention", Psychological Review, 84, pp.1~66 (1977)
  37. Shaw, J. S. I., "Recognition instructions and recognition practice can alter the confidence–response time relationship", Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, pp.93~103 (2001)
  38. Spears, N., "Revealing obstacles to the consumer imagination", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(3), pp.363~372 (2014)
  39. Sweller, J., "Natural information processing systems", Evolutionary Psychology, 4, pp.434~458 (2006)
  40. Szpunar, K. K., "Episodic future thought and its relation to remembering: Evidence from ratings of subjective experience", Consciousness and Cognition, 17, pp.330~334 (2008)
  41. Van Dyne, L., "Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, pp.439~459 (2004)
  42. Weiss, L., "Egocentric categorization and product judgment: Seeing your traits in what you own (and their opposite in what you don't)", Journal of Consumer Research, 40(1), pp.185~201 (2013)
  43. Weiss, L., "Products as self-evaluation standards: When owned and unowned products have opposite effects on self-judgment", Journal of Consumer Research, 42(6), pp.915~930 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)