역사 기록 메타픽션으로서 하 진의 『전쟁쓰레기』
Ha Jin’s War Trash as Historiographic Metafiction
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article analyzes Ha Jin’s novel War Trash through the lens of historiographic metafiction, drawing on Linda Hutcheon’s theories such as ‘intertextuality,’ ‘paratextuality,’ and ‘self-reflexivity’. Historiographic metafiction challenges the notion of a singular, objective history by embracing a multiplicity of truths. It argues that history is no longer a monolithic narrative, but rather a collection of fragmented and individual histories. This perspective also applies to literary historiography. Hutcheon destabilizes the distinction between history and fiction, contending that historiographic metafiction creates a new form of historicity through “the textual incorporation of intertextual past(s) as a constitutive structural element” (“Historiographical Metafiction” 4). This article examines how War Trash functions as both a work of historical fiction and a fictionalized account of history. To support this analysis, the article explores the techniques of historiographic metafiction employed by Jin, such as paratextuality, intertextuality, and self-reflexivity. Lastly, it argues that historiographic metafiction holds significant potential for amplifying the voices of POWs in modern Chinese history, a group whose narratives have often been marginalized or silenced.
Abstract
This article analyzes Ha Jin’s novel War Trash through the lens of historiographic metafiction, drawing on Linda Hutcheon’s theories such as ‘intertextuality,’ ‘paratextuality,’ and ‘self-reflexivity’. Historiographic metafiction challenges the notion of a singular, objective history by embracing a multiplicity of truths. It argues that history is no longer a monolithic narrative, but rather a collection of fragmented and individual histories. This perspective also applies to literary historiography. Hutcheon destabilizes the distinction between history and fiction, contending that historiographic metafiction creates a new form of historicity through “the textual incorporation of intertextual past(s) as a constitutive structural element” (“Historiographical Metafiction” 4). This article examines how War Trash functions as both a work of historical fiction and a fictionalized account of history. To support this analysis, the article explores the techniques of historiographic metafiction employed by Jin, such as paratextuality, intertextuality, and self-reflexivity. Lastly, it argues that historiographic metafiction holds significant potential for amplifying the voices of POWs in modern Chinese history, a group whose narratives have often been marginalized or silenced.
