본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

서비스실패의 회복방안에서 지각된 공정성유형의 회복만족도효과에서소비자의 사회적 관계의 역할

Roles of Consumer’s Social Relationship and Perceived Justice Type on Service Recovery Satisfaction

임아영|박수민|최낙환
한국유통과학회 (Korea Distribution Science Association)|2018.01|산경연구논집 (The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business)|제9권 제1호|pp. 77-88

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Justice TypeService Failure RecoverySocial Relationship.

초록

Purpose – Past research has not given much attention to the roles of consumers’ social relationship type in the effects of justice type of service failure recovery alternatives on their satisfaction to the alternative exposed to them. Current research aimed at exploring the moderation role of consumers’ social relationship central versus peripheral in the effects of justice types of service failure recovery alternatives on the recovery satisfaction, and this research also explored whether the level of satisfaction to interaction justice-focused alternative are significantly different between the two, their social relationship central and peripheral relationship. Research design, data, and methodology – 2(social relationship central versus peripheral) between-subjects design was employed. 50 participants for each experimental group there were. Participants of each group took forceful steps in choosing one between the procedural justice-focused alternative and the distribution justice-focused alternative. χ2-analysis was used to verify that the number of choosing each alternative becomes different between the two experimental groups, and a one way ANOVA was used to verify that the extent to which participants are satisfied to the alternative chosen by them becomes different between the two groups. Results – The number of participants choosing procedural justice-focused alternative at the group of social relationship central was larger than that at the group of social relationship peripheral, whereas the number of participants choosing distribution justice-focused alternative at the group of social relationship peripheral was larger than that at the group of social relationship central. And the level of satisfaction to procedural justice-focused alternative at the group of social relationship central was higher than that at the group of social relationship peripheral, whereas the level of satisfaction to distribution justice-focused alternative at the group of social relationship peripheral was higher than that at the group of social relationship central. In addition, the level of satisfaction to interaction justice-focused alternative was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions – Marketers should give attention to the type of justice when developing alternatives by which consumers’ service failure can be recovered. They should suggest procedural justice-focused alternative to consumers under social relationship central, whereas they should develop distribution justice-focused alternative for consumers under social relationship peripheral. And in the process of recovering service failure they also should focus on interaction justice.

Abstract

Purpose – Past research has not given much attention to the roles of consumers’ social relationship type in the effects of justice type of service failure recovery alternatives on their satisfaction to the alternative exposed to them. Current research aimed at exploring the moderation role of consumers’ social relationship central versus peripheral in the effects of justice types of service failure recovery alternatives on the recovery satisfaction, and this research also explored whether the level of satisfaction to interaction justice-focused alternative are significantly different between the two, their social relationship central and peripheral relationship. Research design, data, and methodology – 2(social relationship central versus peripheral) between-subjects design was employed. 50 participants for each experimental group there were. Participants of each group took forceful steps in choosing one between the procedural justice-focused alternative and the distribution justice-focused alternative. χ2-analysis was used to verify that the number of choosing each alternative becomes different between the two experimental groups, and a one way ANOVA was used to verify that the extent to which participants are satisfied to the alternative chosen by them becomes different between the two groups. Results – The number of participants choosing procedural justice-focused alternative at the group of social relationship central was larger than that at the group of social relationship peripheral, whereas the number of participants choosing distribution justice-focused alternative at the group of social relationship peripheral was larger than that at the group of social relationship central. And the level of satisfaction to procedural justice-focused alternative at the group of social relationship central was higher than that at the group of social relationship peripheral, whereas the level of satisfaction to distribution justice-focused alternative at the group of social relationship peripheral was higher than that at the group of social relationship central. In addition, the level of satisfaction to interaction justice-focused alternative was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions – Marketers should give attention to the type of justice when developing alternatives by which consumers’ service failure can be recovered. They should suggest procedural justice-focused alternative to consumers under social relationship central, whereas they should develop distribution justice-focused alternative for consumers under social relationship peripheral. And in the process of recovering service failure they also should focus on interaction justice.

참고문헌 (58)

  1. Adams, J. S., "Inequity in social exchange", Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, pp.267~299 (1965)
  2. Alexander, S., "The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior", Social Justice Research, 1(2), pp.177~198 (1987)
  3. Anderson, C., "The experience of power : Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), pp.1362~1377 (2002)
  4. Anderson, C., "Power, optimism, and risk‐taking", European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(4), pp.511~536 (2006)
  5. Bargh, J. A., "Attractiveness of the underling : An automatic power-sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), pp.768~781 (1995)
  6. Basso, K., "Trust recovery following a double deviation", Journal of Service Research, 19(2), pp.209~223 (2016)
  7. Bettman, J. R., "Constructive consumer choice processes", Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), pp.187~217 (1998)
  8. Blodgett, J. G., "The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on postcomplaint behavior", Journal of Retailing, 73(2), pp.185~210 (1997)
  9. Bohns, V. K., "It hurts when I do this(or you do that) : Posture and pain tolerance", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), pp.341~345 (2012)
  10. Carney, D. R., "Power posing : Brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance", Psychological Science, 21(10), pp.1363~1368 (2010)
  11. Cha, G. Y., "Effect of power on consumer responses to differentiated marketing", Master, pp.2014
  12. Chen, S., "Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), pp.173~187 (2001)
  13. 조현진, "서비스 품질이 쇼핑가치와 재이용의도에 미치는 영향:커피전문점을 중심으로", 유통과학연구, 10(4), pp.21~28 (2012), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  14. 조문식, "호텔종사원의 서비스회복 공정성이 재구매 의도에 미치는 영향", 관광연구, 26(1), pp.371~386 (2011), 대한관광경영학회
  15. 최낙환, "문화 지향성별 파워개념에 대응하는 로컬푸드점포에 대한 태도요인", 유통과학연구, 14(8), pp.129~138 (2016), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  16. Clemmer, E. C., "Advances in services marketing and management Vol.5", pp.109~126 (1996), JAI Press
  17. Deci, E. L., "The ‘what’ and ‘why’of goal pursuits : Human needs and the self-determination of behavior", Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), pp.227~268 (2000)
  18. Dubois, D., "The accentuation bias : Money literally looms larger(and sometimes smaller)to the powerless", Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(3), pp.199~205 (2010)
  19. Fast, N. J., "The destructive nature of power without status", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), pp.391~394 (2012)
  20. French, J. R., "The bases of social power in Studies in Social Power Cartwright" (1959), University of Michigan Press
  21. Galinsky, A. D., "From power to action", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), pp.453~466 (2003)
  22. Goodwin, C., "Consumer responses to service failures : Influence of procedural and interactional fairness perceptions", Journal of Business Research, 25(2), pp.149~163 (1992)
  23. Greenberg, J., "Organizational justice : Yesterday, today, and tomorrow", Journal of Management, 16(2), pp.399~432 (1990)
  24. Greenberg, J., "The Interpersonal Aspects of Procedural Justice : A New Perspective in Pay Fairness", Labor Law Journal, 41(3), pp.580~585 (1990)
  25. Halstead, D., "Product warranties and post-purchase service : A model of consumer satisfaction with complaint resolution", Journal of Services Marketing, 7(1), pp.33~40 (1993)
  26. Hoffman, K. D., "Tracking service failures and employee recovery efforts", Journal of Services Marketing, 9(2), pp.49~61 (1995)
  27. Howard, J. A., "Sex, power, and influence tactics in intimate relationships", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), pp.102~109 (1986)
  28. Karatepe, O. M., "Customer complaints and organizational responses : The effects of complainants’ perceptions of justice on satisfaction and loyalty", International Journal of Hospitality Management, 25(1), pp.69~90 (2006)
  29. Karremans, J. C., "Having the power to forgive : When the experience of power increases interpersonal forgiveness", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(8), pp.1010~1023 (2010)
  30. Kelley, S. W., "Antecedents to customer expectations for service recovery", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(1), pp.52~61 (1994)
  31. Keltner, D., "Power, approach, and inhibition", Psychological Review, 110(2), pp.265~284 (2003)
  32. 김미정, "고객의 시간 지향성: 소매업체에서의 서비스 편의성과쇼핑 성과의 관계에 대한 조절효과", 유통과학연구, 14(2), pp.123~133 (2016), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  33. 김상철, "서비스품질 관리를 위한 프로세스 접점에 관한 연구: 프랜차이즈 외식업을 중심으로", 유통과학연구, 11(8), pp.25~30 (2013), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  34. 이재진, "서비스실패에 대한 소비자의 2단계 반응 연구- 브랜드선호상황과 성별을 중심으로", 마케팅연구, 29(5), pp.51~75 (2014), 한국마케팅학회
  35. Leventhal, G. S., "Justice and Social Interaction" (1980), Springer Verlag
  36. Levesque, T. J., "Service problems and recovery strategies : An experiment", Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 17(1), pp.20~37 (2000)
  37. Lind, E. A., "The social psychology of procedural justice" (1988), Plenum Publishing Corporation
  38. Lusch, R. F., "Service-Dominant logic : Reactions, reflections and refinements", Marketing Theory, 6(3), pp.281~288 (2006)
  39. Magee, J. C., "8 Social hierarchy : The self‐reinforcing nature of power and status", Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), pp.351~398 (2008)
  40. Maxham, J. G., "Modeling customer perceptions of complaint handling over time : The effects of perceived justice on satisfaction and intent", Journal of Retailing, 78(4), pp.239~252 (2002)
  41. McGraw, A. P., "Taboo trade-offs, relational framing, and the acceptability of exchanges", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1), pp.2~15 (2005)
  42. Miller, J. L., "Service recovery : A framework and empirical investigation", Journal of operations Management, 18(4), pp.387~400 (2000)
  43. Mourali, M., "The dual role of power in resisting social influence", Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), pp.539~554 (2013)
  44. Parasuraman, A., "A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research", The Journal of Marketing, 49(4), pp.41~50 (1985)
  45. 박은경, "Kano모델을 고려한 서비스회복 공정성 지각과 고객만족에 관한 연구 - 20-30대 여성 커피전문점 이용고객을 대상으로 -", 관광연구, 25(2), pp.137~155 (2010), 대한관광경영학회
  46. 박은지, "서비스 회복이 고객의 행동 의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 서비스 회복의 공정성과 진정성을 중심으로", 유통과학연구, 13(2), pp.63~73 (2015), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  47. Richins, M. L., "A multivariate analysis of responses to dissatisfaction", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 15(3), pp.24~31 (1987)
  48. Rucker, D. D., "Power and consumer behavior : How power shapes who and what consumers value", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), pp.352~368 (2012)
  49. Sembada, A., "The positive effects of customers’ power on their behavioral responses after service failure", Journal of Service Research, 19(3), pp.337~351 (2016)
  50. Smith, A. K., "An experimental investigation of customer reactions to service failure and recovery encounters : Paradox or peril?", Journal of Service Research, 1(1), pp.65~81 (1998)
  51. Smith, A. K., "A model of customer satisfaction with service encounters involving failure and recovery", Journal of Marketing Research, 36(3), pp.356~372 (1999)
  52. Smith, P. K., "You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees : Power priming and abstract information processing", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), pp.578~596 (2006)
  53. Sparks, B. A., "Justice strategy options for increased customer satisfaction in a services recovery setting", Journal of Business Research, 54(3), pp.209~218 (2001)
  54. 성형석, "고객의 자기조절성향이 서비스 실패에 따른부정적 감정과 고객반응에 미치는 영향 -귀인과정에 따른 조정적 역할을 중심으로-", 아시아마케팅저널, 12(2), pp.83~110 (2010), 한국마케팅학회
  55. Tax, S. S., "Customer evaluations of service complaint experiences : Implications for relationship marketing", The Journal of Marketing, 62(2), pp.60~76 (1998)
  56. Weiner, B., "Handbook of Personality:Theory and Research", pp.465~484 (1990), Guilford
  57. Zeelenberg, M., "Beyond valence in customer dissatisfaction : A review and new findings on behavioral responses to regret and disappointment in failed services", Journal of Business Research, 57(4), pp.445~455 (2004)
  58. Zemke, R., "Service recovery : Doing it right the second time", Training, 27(6), pp.42~48 (1990)

관련 논문AI추천

서비스복구의 공정성 지각이 고객의 만족과 그 행동적 결과에 미치는 영향강명주, 조상리대한경영정보학회 · 경영과 정보연구2014 · 제33권 제1호공정성 지각과 고객 용서: 서비스 회복에서 관계 품질이 미치는 조절 효과주커, 공태식경영경제연구소 · 아태비즈니스연구2025 · 제16권 제1호유통점의 서비스회복 노력이 회복만족에 미치는 영향: 공정성, 진정성, 조언수용을 중심으로신용선, Moon-Seop Kim한국유통과학회 · 유통과학연구2018 · 제16권 제12호회복공정성과 만족의 관계에서 관계마케팅 요인의 조절효과양희진, 이수형, 이종환한국산업경영학회 · 경영연구2006 · 제21권 제2호서비스 회복에 대한 공정성 지각과 고객만족 및 행동의도의 관계에 관한 연구 -인터넷 접촉 서비스를 중심으로-김립인한국상품학회 · 상품학연구2004 · 제33호서비스회복 과정에서 고객 성별의 효과: 지각된 공정성과 회복성과간 관계를 중심으로김미정, 박상일한국상품학회 · 상품학연구2012 · 제30권 제7호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

Do Teams Perform Better than Singles? : Evidence from the Mutual Fund Industry in Korea김지현pp. 9-23Donor Country’s Fiscal Status and ODA Decisions before and after 2008 Global Financial Crisis박단비, Hyeonmi Ahnpp. 25-38A Study on the Effects of SMVEs Export Modes on Export Amount and PeriodByung-Mo Coopp. 39-49Factors Influencing Users’ Word-of-Mouth Intention Regarding Mobile Apps : An Empirical StudyYu-Fei Shang, Yao Chenpp. 51-65문화적 유사성이 의료관광산업에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구이훈영, ZHANGJUNpp. 67-76
원문 보기