본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

메가스포츠이벤트와 사회적 자본의 역할: 갈등이론을 중심으로 한 한국과 미국의 이벤트 유치지역사회의 관점 비교에 대한 연구

Mega Sport Event and Social Capital: A Host Community Perspective Comparison in Korea and the US through Social Conflict Theory

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose – The current study is to compare the cognition of stakeholders on hosting a mega sports event between Korea and the United States. In particular, to understand their cognition and perceptual conflict towards hosting a mega sports event, the study employed conflict theory. Furthermore, the study reviewed the role of social capital in the process of managing the mega sports events. Research Design, Data, and Methodology – Of homogeneous sampling, purposeful sampling method and criterion-based selection approach were used to collect interview data from key stakeholders who have been involved in hosting a mega sports events in Korea and the United States. In-depth interview transcripts were reviewed multiple tiems after transcription to extract concepts and meanings that were pertinenet to the experience involving hosting a mega sports event. Further member checks was conducted to increase the credibility of the results. Results – Results can be summarized as followed: First, stakeholders of Korea have a strong desire for positive economic effects of a mega sports event, compared to those in the United States who are more concerned in enhancing the public interests and concerns. Second, in Korea, various socio-political issues emerged at the same time and conflicts among multiple stakeholders have aggravated the situations to coordinate the issues. This was because legal system supporting socio-trust has not been established. On the other hand, major stakeholders of the United States consisted of community members who have socio-trust and networks. Thereby these social resources have been found playing a key role in building social capital that assists the stakeholders to coordinate the current issues and to solve them. Conclusions – The current study analyzed the cognition and perceptual conflict of stakehoders in a mega sports event. Social capital has beend found as a key catalyst to increase a network and cooperation among stakeholders. In order to enhance social capital in managing a mega sports event hosted in Korea, legal systems that establish networks and relationships among the related stakeholders need to be developed. Furthermore, the systematic guideline needs to be developed, organizing the sub-committees according to the types of stakeholders and the categorized common needs.

Abstract

Purpose – The current study is to compare the cognition of stakeholders on hosting a mega sports event between Korea and the United States. In particular, to understand their cognition and perceptual conflict towards hosting a mega sports event, the study employed conflict theory. Furthermore, the study reviewed the role of social capital in the process of managing the mega sports events. Research Design, Data, and Methodology – Of homogeneous sampling, purposeful sampling method and criterion-based selection approach were used to collect interview data from key stakeholders who have been involved in hosting a mega sports events in Korea and the United States. In-depth interview transcripts were reviewed multiple tiems after transcription to extract concepts and meanings that were pertinenet to the experience involving hosting a mega sports event. Further member checks was conducted to increase the credibility of the results. Results – Results can be summarized as followed: First, stakeholders of Korea have a strong desire for positive economic effects of a mega sports event, compared to those in the United States who are more concerned in enhancing the public interests and concerns. Second, in Korea, various socio-political issues emerged at the same time and conflicts among multiple stakeholders have aggravated the situations to coordinate the issues. This was because legal system supporting socio-trust has not been established. On the other hand, major stakeholders of the United States consisted of community members who have socio-trust and networks. Thereby these social resources have been found playing a key role in building social capital that assists the stakeholders to coordinate the current issues and to solve them. Conclusions – The current study analyzed the cognition and perceptual conflict of stakehoders in a mega sports event. Social capital has beend found as a key catalyst to increase a network and cooperation among stakeholders. In order to enhance social capital in managing a mega sports event hosted in Korea, legal systems that establish networks and relationships among the related stakeholders need to be developed. Furthermore, the systematic guideline needs to be developed, organizing the sub-committees according to the types of stakeholders and the categorized common needs.

참고문헌 (57)

  1. Anagnostopoulos, C., "Passion in the workplace : empirical insights from team sport organisations", European Sport Management Quarterly, 16(4), pp.385~412 (2016)
  2. Bacharach, S. B., "Bargaining: Power, Tactics and Outcomes" (1981), Jossey-Bass Inc
  3. 조은성, "마케팅에서 갈등 연구 : 이론적 고찰 및 제안", 산업경제연구, 19(4), pp.1319~1353 (2006), 한국산업경제학회
  4. Cho, J. G., "Global negotiation" (2013), Parkyoungsa
  5. A study on the evaluation and management of a local unit social capital, "Choi, K. S.", Daejeon Development Institution, ~ (2013)
  6. Coleman, J. S., "Social capital in the creation of human capital", American Journal of sociology, pp.S95~S120 (1988)
  7. Fisher, R., "Getting to yes:Negotiating agreement without giving in" (2011), Penguin
  8. Frederick, E. L., "Examining the Presence of Agenda Setting on Twitter During the 2012 London Olympics", Communication &Sport, 3(3), pp.312~333 (2015)
  9. c. 2), "Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity (No. D10 301 c. 1", pp.1995, Fukuyama, F.
  10. Guan, J., "The impact of multilevel networks on innovation", Resarch Policy, 44(3), pp.545~559 (2015)
  11. Guion, L. A., "Conducting an in-depth interview. University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service", Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, EDIS, ~ (2001)
  12. Harper, R., "Measuring social capital in the United Kingdom" (2003), London Office for National Statistics
  13. A study on the index development &evaluation of social capital, "Hong, Y. R.", Institution for the Korea Education Development, ~ (2007)
  14. Hyundai Economic Institution, , Economic weekly, 19(21), pp.1~17 (2014)
  15. 장용석, "한국의 사회적 자본과 갈등: 사회적 자본의 다면적 속성에 대한 재조명", 조사연구, 10(2), pp.45~69 (2009), 한국조사연구학회
  16. 조용환, "교육인류학과 질적 연구", 교육인류학연구, 15(2), pp.1~21 (2012), 한국교육인류학회[DOI]
  17. "Denver City surrendering the Olyjmpic flag" (1972)[URL]
  18. Kangwon Research Institution, "A better health-care management by medical big data", Kangwondo, ~ (2018)
  19. Lawler, E. J., "Coercive capability in conflict : A test of bilateral deterrence versus conflict spiral theory", Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, pp.93~107 (1998)
  20. LeCompte, M. D., "Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research" (1993), Academic Press
  21. "IOC suggested the co-host between Korea and Japan" (2014)[URL]
  22. 이재혁, "신뢰와 시민사회:한미 비교연구", 한국사회학, 40(5), pp.61~98 (2006), 한국사회학회
  23. Lee, K. M., "Conflict theory and sports", pp.11~36 (2010), Korean Society for the Sociology of Sport
  24. Miall, H., "Contemporary Conflict Resolution" (2011), Polity Press
  25. Miles, M. B., "Quantitative data analysis: An expanded source book" (1994), Sage Publications
  26. Mueller, G. E., "The Hegel legend of"Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis"", Journal of the History of Ideas, 19(3), pp.411~414 (1958)
  27. Nahapiet, J., "Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage", The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), pp.242~266 (1998)
  28. Nicholson, M., "Sport and social capital" (2008), Butterworth-Heinemann
  29. O’Brien, D., "Executive training exercise in sport event leverage", International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 1(4), pp.296~304 (2007)
  30. Ostrom, E., "Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action" (1990), Cambridge
  31. "Restoration or maintenance of Gariwang Mountain?" (2018)[URL]
  32. 박소은, "문화적응스트레스가 결혼이주여성의 양육효능감에 미치는 영향: 사회적 자본의 조절효과를 중심으로", 한국가족복지학, (38), pp.359~384 (2012), 한국가족사회복지학회[DOI]
  33. "Issues on the PyeongChang Olympic Games" (2014)[URL]
  34. "Who are the owner of the PyeongChang Olympic Games?" (2015)[URL]
  35. Patton, M. Q., "Qualitative evaluation and research methods" (1990), Sage
  36. Peachey, J., "Building social capital : Examining the impact of Street Soccer USA on its volunteers", International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 48(1), pp.20~37 (2013)
  37. Putnam, R. D., "The prosperous community", The american prospect, 4(13), pp.35~42 (1993)
  38. Putnam, R. D., "Tuning in, tuning out : The strange disappearance of social capital in America", Political science & politics, 28(4), pp.664~683 (1995)
  39. Putnam, L. L., "Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective", pp.549~599 (1987), Sage Publications, Inc
  40. "Sustainability Interim Report" (2017)[URL]
  41. "Pre-Games Sustainability Report. Furthering benefits to People and Nature" (2017)[URL]
  42. Rothstein, B., "Generating social capital", pp.191~209 (2003), Palgrave Macmillan
  43. Saha, M., "Impact of social capital on small firm performance in West Bengal", Journal of Entrepreneurship, 24, pp.91~114 (2015)
  44. Developing politics for enhancing social capital, "Samsung Economic Research Institute", SERI, ~ (2009)
  45. Sanginga, P. C., "The dynamics of social capital and conflict management in multiple resource regimes : A case of the Southwestern Highlands of Uganda", Ecology and Society, 12, pp.6~ (2007)
  46. Schulenkorf, N., "Sport for Development : An Integrated Literature Review", Journal of Sport Management, 30(1), pp.22~39 (2016)
  47. Sherry, E., "(Re)engaging marginalized groups through sport : The Homeless World Cup", International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 45, pp.59~71 (2010)
  48. Skinner, J., "Development through sport : Building social capital in disadvantaged communities", Sport Management Review, 11, pp.253~275 (2008)
  49. Smith, E., "Social Psychology" (2015), Psychology Press
  50. Sorm, S., "An Integration of social paradigms into the analysis of social development theories", International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 7(4), pp.65~83 (2016)
  51. Statistics Korea, "Local medical use statistics", National Health Insurance Service, ~ (2015)
  52. "It is not too late to co-host the Olympic Games" (2015)[URL]
  53. Tanasescu, A., "The limits of social capital", Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 37(4), pp.97~122 (2010)
  54. Thoma, J. E., "Sport governance in the global community" (1996), Fitness Information Technology
  55. Tonts, M., "Competitive sport and social capital in rural Australia", Journal of Rural Studies, 21(2), pp.137~149 (2005)
  56. Valeri M., "Corporate Social Responsibility and Reporting in Sports Organizations. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance" (2019), Springer
  57. Yang, C. S., "Making good society and roles of organizations", The Korean Journal of Humanities and the Social Sciences, 23(1·2), pp.119~139 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)