『자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 법률』의 수시공시 규제체계에 관한 고찰
A Study on the Non-Periodic Disclosure Regulation in the Newly Enacted the『Capital Market and Financial Industry Act』
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article addresses the non-periodic disclosure regulation in the secondary market introduced in the newly enacted "Capital Market and Financial Industry Act." The Act substantially changes the non-periodic disclosure or timely disclosure regulation from the current one in the "Securities and Exchange Act." One of the most significant changes is the introduction of "Current Report" and making the current non-periodic disclosure system having been based on a law as a pure self-regulation by the Korea Exchange (KRX) without legal delegation. The paper argues against the new disclosure regulation. First, the regulation causes duplication between the "current report" and timely disclosure policies by the Exchange, accordingly makes a burden on listed companies. Second, since the new Act gets rid of legal basis from timely disclosure regulation by the KRX, it becomes impossible to sanction with legal measures violations of "disclosure by inquiry" of the Korea Exchange. The other is the permission of withholding timely disclosure in some cases, which seems incompatible with the current timely disclosure system. This study suggests some solutions to deal with the above problems in the new disclosure regulation. First, it recommends the non-periodic disclosure regulations in the secondary market be integrated into a single system to avoid burdensome duplication. As pre-conditions for the successful integration, the paper suggests two important measures: monetary penalty for violations of the Exchange's timely disclosure policies and delegation of detailed regulation to the Exchange's rule specifying and limiting the mandated scope. Second, the paper insists the permission of withholding disclosure be limited to the "disclosure by inquiry" exceptionally.
Abstract
This article addresses the non-periodic disclosure regulation in the secondary market introduced in the newly enacted "Capital Market and Financial Industry Act." The Act substantially changes the non-periodic disclosure or timely disclosure regulation from the current one in the "Securities and Exchange Act." One of the most significant changes is the introduction of "Current Report" and making the current non-periodic disclosure system having been based on a law as a pure self-regulation by the Korea Exchange (KRX) without legal delegation. The paper argues against the new disclosure regulation. First, the regulation causes duplication between the "current report" and timely disclosure policies by the Exchange, accordingly makes a burden on listed companies. Second, since the new Act gets rid of legal basis from timely disclosure regulation by the KRX, it becomes impossible to sanction with legal measures violations of "disclosure by inquiry" of the Korea Exchange. The other is the permission of withholding timely disclosure in some cases, which seems incompatible with the current timely disclosure system. This study suggests some solutions to deal with the above problems in the new disclosure regulation. First, it recommends the non-periodic disclosure regulations in the secondary market be integrated into a single system to avoid burdensome duplication. As pre-conditions for the successful integration, the paper suggests two important measures: monetary penalty for violations of the Exchange's timely disclosure policies and delegation of detailed regulation to the Exchange's rule specifying and limiting the mandated scope. Second, the paper insists the permission of withholding disclosure be limited to the "disclosure by inquiry" exceptionally.
참고문헌 (40)
- "3C Bloomenthal and Wolff, Sec. & Fed. Corp. Law (2nd ed)" (2003)
- "American Stock Exchange Company Guide §402(a)", ~
- Feuerstein, "The Corporation's Obligations of Disclosure Under the Federal Securities Laws: When It Is Not Trading in Its Stock", N.Y.L.F, 15 (1969)
- "Intercontinental Indus. Inc. v. American Stock Exchange, 452 F.2d 935 (5th Cir. 1971)", ~ (1971)
- J. Robert Brown, Jr, "The Regulation of Corporate Disclosure (3rd ed)" (2000)
- "New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual §202.01", ~
- "Additional Form 8-K Disclosure Requirements and Acceleration of Filing Date, Release Nos. 33-8400; 34-49424, 69 F.R. 15,594" (2004)[URL]
- 강신웅, "위약벌의 인정문제", 민사법연구, 5 (1996), 대한민사법학회
- "거래소 공시규정 제28조(자율공시)", ~
- "거래소 유가증권시장공시규정 제49조(공시문안 정정)", ~
- "기업내용등의공시에관한내각부령, 제19조(임시보고서의 기재내용 등)", ~
- 김병연, "증권시장의 수시공시체계에 대한 검토 - 우리나라와 미국의 경우를 비교하여", 비교사법, 12(1)통권 : 28 (2005), 한국비교사법학회
- "대법원 1989.10.10. 선고 88다카25601 판결", ~ (1989)
- "대법원 1993.4.23. 선고 92다41719 판결", ~ (1993)
- "대법원 2002.4.23. 선고 2000다56976 판결", ~ (2002)
- "대판 1968.6.4. 68다491", ~ (1968)
- "대판 1979.9.11. 79다1270", ~ (1979)
- "대판 1989.10.10. 88다카25601", ~ (1989)
- "대판 1991.4.26. 90다6880", ~ (1991)
- 매일경제, "솜방망이 처벌 불성실공시 부추겨", 매일경제, 2008.4.30, ~ (2008)
- "민법 제398조 (배상액의 예정)", ~
- 박홍래, "손해배상액의 예정과 위약벌", 민사법연구, 9 (2001), 대한민사법학회
- 성희활, "엔론사태 이후의 미국의 임시보고서 개편에 따른수시공시 규제체제의 변화와 그 시사점", 비교사법, 11(4), pp.197~231 (2004), 한국비교사법학회
- "유가증권의 발행 및 공시등에 관한 규정 제69조제1항제20호", ~
- 이명웅, "위임입법의 위헌심사기준 및 위헌결정사례 분석", 저스티스, (96), pp.65~87 (2007), 한국법학원
- 이상돈, "團體協約違反罪 條項의 違憲與否와 代替立法의 方向", 저스티스, 32(3) (1999), 한국법학원
- "자통법 입법예고안 제154조(상장법인의 공시)", ~
- "자통법 제120조제3항", ~
- "자통법 제161조(주요사항보고서의 제출)", ~
- "자통법 제391조 (공시규정)", ~
- "증권거래법 제188조의4(시세조종등 불공정거래의 금지)", ~
- 지원림, "민법강의(제4판)", 홍문사 (2005)
- 최창열, "손해배상액의 예정과 위약벌의 구별에 관한 연구", 민사법학, (21) (2002), 한국민사법학회
- 공시제도 선진화 방안, "한국증권연구원", ~ (2002)
- "헌법 제37조", ~
- "헌법재판소 2005.4.28, 2003헌바40 결정", ~ (2005)
- "헌법재판소 전원재판부 1998.3.26, 96헌가20 결정", ~ (1998)
- "헌법재판소 전원재판부 2001.1.18. 99헌바112 결정", ~ (2001)