본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

위법운전자에 대한 정책수단 선택의 효과 비교

Comparison the Effectiveness of Policy Means on Violating Drivers

명묘희
한국법정책학회 (Korean Association Of Law And Politics)|2009.07|법과정책연구 (Journal of Law and Politics research)|제9권 제1호|pp. 249-272|DOI 10.17926/kaolp.2009.9.1.249

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

교통안전정책효과정책순응정책수단Traffic safetyPolicy effectivenessPolicy compliancePolicy meansTraffic law violation
주제분류법학

초록

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to make comparison of policy means to find which one can ensure compliance to the traffic safety regulatory policies. The comparison among effects to ensure compliance among policy mean was done i)between punishment and incentive measures under the condition of strict punishment in case of future disobedience for the same act of disobedience and ii)between punishment and the persuasive mean of traffic safety education under the condition of relieving administrative measures. This paper aimed to analyze which policy measures are more effective, through a longitudinal research on the drivers’ repeated violations of traffic regulations. In order to raise the credibility of analysis in both, two kinds of analysis methodology were used, which are first, analysis of covariance and t-test after sample matching, and second, analysis of covariance and logistic regression analysis. Regardless of the difference in analysis methodology, the same results were deduced. As a result of comparing effects between punishment measures and incentive measures, incentive measures were found to have higher effect. Also, in comparison of effect of securing obedience to traffic regulations between punishment measures and persuasive measures, persuasive measures were found to be more effective in the rate of violation of traffic regulations. Based on these findings, this paper suggested that compliance-friendly ways of regulations be introduced that have various and flexible strategies to help drivers to voluntarily comply to the policy, comprehensive strategies for regulations be established, regulation strategies that are divided by the character of regulation or types of noncompliance be established and be used and traditional punishment measures be changed to incentive measures or persuasive measures that have higher effect of securing compliance.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. 김중규, "뉴밀레니엄 행정학" (2002), 성지각
  2. 김태윤, "시장유인적 규제방식의 개발", 한국행정연구원, ~ (1999)
  3. 도로교통공단, "07 도로교통사고비용의 추계와 평가" (2008), 도로교통공단
  4. 도로교통안전관리공단, "위법운전자 제재수단의 효율성 확보방안 연구" (2006), 도로교통안전관리공단
  5. 박경효, "규제순응의 확보전략: 규제대안 및 규제다원주의 관점에서", 한국행정연구, 10(2), pp.173~200 (2001)
  6. 박상주, "정책불응에 관한 합리선택론적 연구", 박사, pp.1998
  7. 삼성교통안전문화연구소, "교통범칙금 및 과태료 수준에 관한 연구" (2004), 삼성교통안전문화연구소
  8. 설재훈, "교통문화 선진화 방안", 교통개발연구원, ~ (1998)
  9. 정정길, "정책학원론" (2003), 대명출판사
  10. 최병선, "정부규제론" (2003), 법문사
  11. 최유성, "대안적 규제전략에 관한 연구", 한국행정연구원, ~ (2004)
  12. 홍성삼, "교통안전규제의 억제효과에 관한 연구: 음주운전을 중심으로", 박사, pp.1998
  13. 홍세희, "이항 및 다항 로지스틱 회귀분석" (2005), 교육과학사
  14. Akers, R, "Social Learning and Deviant Behavior: A Specific Test of a General Theory", American Sociological Review, 44, pp.636~655 (1979)
  15. Anderson,J.E, "Public Policy-Making-An Introduction, 6th ed" (2006), Houghton Mifflin Company.
  16. Ayres, I, "Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate" (1992), Oxford University Press
  17. Balch,G.I, "The Stick, the Carrot, and Other Strategies in Policy Implementation" (1980), Sage Publication
  18. The effects of the National Drivers Improvement Scheme on re-offending rates, "Broughton, J", Transportation Research Laboratory, ~, pp.Report 649 (2005)
  19. DeYoung,D.J, "An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Alcohol Treatment, Driver License Actions and Jail Terms in Reducing Drunk Driving Recidivism in California", Addiction, 92(8), pp.989~997 (1997)
  20. Freeman, J, "An Application of Stafford and Warr's Reconceptuali -zation of Deterrence to a Group of Recidivist Drink Drivers", Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38(3), pp.462~471 (2006)
  21. Greenberg,D.F, "Methodological Issues in Survey Research on the Inhibition of Crime", Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 71(3), pp.1094~1101 (1981)
  22. Gunningham, N, "Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy" (1998), Clarendon Press
  23. Hagen,R.E, "Effectiveness of License Suspension or Revocation for Drivers Convicted of Multiple Driving - under the Influence Offenses", Department of Motor Vehicles, ~ (1977)
  24. Homel,R, "Policing and Punishing the Drinking Driver: A Study of General and Specific Deterrence" (1988), Springer-Verlag
  25. Jones, R. L, "Evaluation of an Individualized Sanctioning Program for DWI Offenders", National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, ~ (1998), DOT-HS-808-842
  26. Kim. K. S, "Evaluating the Effects of Safety Policy Measures on Traffic Fatalities in Korea", Transport Reviews, 26(3), pp.293~304 (2006)
  27. Lapham, S. C, "Impaired Driving Recidivism among Repeat Offenders Following an Intensive Court-Based Intervention", Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38(1), pp.162~169 (2006)
  28. Mann, R. E, "Sentence Severity and the drinking Driver: Relations with Traffic Safety Outcome", Accident Analysis and Prevention, 23(6), pp.483~491 (1991)
  29. Mann, R. E, "A Critical Review on the Effectiveness of Drinking-driving Rehabilitaion Programs", Accident Analysis and Prevention, 15(6), pp.441~461 (1983)
  30. McKnight, A. J, "Accident Prevention Versus Recidivism Prevention Courses for Repeat Traffic Offenders", Accident Analysis and Prevention, 29(1), pp.25~31 (1997)
  31. Meier, R. F, "Deterrence as Social Control: The Legal and Extralegal Production of Conformity", American Sociological Review, 42, pp.292~304 (1977)
  32. Nicholas, J. L, "The Specific Deterrent Effectiveness of ASAP Education and Rehabilitation Programs", Journal of Safety Res, 10(4), pp.177~187 (1978)
  33. OECD, "The State of Regulatory Compliance: Issues, Trends and Challenges", PUMA, 1999
  34. Paternoster,R, "The Deterrent Effect of the Perceived Certainty and Severity of Punishment: A Review of the Evidence and Issues", Justice Quarterly, 4(2), pp.173~217 (1987)
  35. Paternoster, R, "The Deterrent Effect of Perceived Severity: A Reexamination", Social Forces, 64, pp.751~777 (1986)
  36. Peck,R.C, "The General and Specific Deterrent Effects of DUI Sanctions: A Review of California's Experience: Alcohol", Drugs and Driving, 7, pp.13~42 (1991)
  37. Piquero, A. R, "Beyond Stafford and Warr's Reconceptualization of Deterrence: Personal and Vicarious Experiences, impulsivity and Offending Behavior", Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39(2), pp.153~186 (2002)
  38. Sadler,D.D, "An Evaluation for the California Drunk Driving Counter-measure System: Volume 4, An Evaluation of the Process Efficiency and Traffic Safety Impact of the California Implied Consent Program", Department of Motor Vehicles, ~ (1986)
  39. Sadler, D. D, "The Long-term Traffic Safety Impact of a Pilot Alcohol Abuse Treatment as an Alternative to License Suspensions: Volume 2 of An Evaluation of the California Drunk Driving Countermeasure system(Report No. 90)", Department of Motor Vehicles, ~ (1984)
  40. License Revocation and Alcoholism Treatment Programs for Habitual Traffic Offender, "Salzburg, P. M", Unpublished Report Prepared for Department of Licensing, ~ (1981)
  41. Salzberg, P. M, "An Evaluation of Washington's Driving while Intoxicated law: Effect on Drunk Driving Recidivism", Journal of Safety Research, 15(3), pp.117~124 (1984)
  42. Schneider, A, "Behavioral Assumptions of Policy Tools", Journal of Politics, 52(2), pp.510~529 (1990)
  43. Schultze,C.L, "The Public Use of Private Interest" (1977), Brookings
  44. Siskind, V, "Does license disqualification reduce reoffence rates?", Accident Analyis and Prevention, 28(4), pp.519~524 (1996)
  45. Stewart, K, "An Evaluation of the Specific Deterrence Effects of Administrative License Revocation", 35th International Congress on Alcohol and Drug Dependence (1988)
  46. Struckman-Johnson, D. L, "Comparative Effects of Driver Improvement Programs on Crashes and Violations", Accident Analysis and Prevention, 21, pp.203~215 (1989)
  47. Tashima, H. N, "An evaluation of the specific deterrent effects of alternative sanctions for first and repeat DUI offenders: Volume 3 of An evaluation of the California drunk driving countermeasure system(Report No. 95)", Department of Motor Vehicles, ~ (1986)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)

건강기능식품법의 문제점과 개선방안조태제pp. 9-35건강기능식품법의 개정 및 의의신현아, 엄애선, 이상화pp. 37-48건강기능식품법의 현황과 과제문상덕pp. 49-80식품법의 체계적 지위최봉석pp. 81-109미국의 건강기능식품법 - 미국연방식약청(FDA)의 규제현황을 중심으로 -정하명pp. 111-128
원문 보기