본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

改定된 四象體質分類檢査紙Ⅱ의 信賴度와 妥當度에 대한 硏究

A Study on the Reliability and Validity Test of the QSCCⅡ+ (Revised Questionnaire for the Sasang Constitution Classification)

2

조회

0

다운로드

15

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류한의학

초록

Abstract

A Study on the Reliability and Validity test of the QSCCⅡ+ (Revised Questionnaire for the Sasang Constitution Classification) Choi Kyung-Ju, Choi Yang-Sik, Cha Jae-Hoon, Hwang Min-Woo, Lee Soo-Kyung, Song Il-Byung Kyung Hee Medical Center Dep. of Sasang Constitutional Medicine 1. Objectives This is a statistical study on the Reliability and Validity of the Revised Questionnaire for the Sasang Constitution Classification(QSCCⅡ+). 2. Methods To analyze the reliability, we gathered the results of the QSCCⅡ+ of 266 people. Each person took the questionnaire three times, and the interval of the examinations were about one year. With the results, we used stratified analysis to check up the consistency rate of three examinations, and analyzed the tendency of agreement by crosstabs to get the kappa value. For the validity, we gathered the results of the QSCCⅡ+ of 587 people who were Taeumin, Soyangin, Soeumin. They took the questionnaire once, and SCM specialists strictly examined to diagnose their Sasang constitutions. We compare their results of the QSCCⅡ+ to the diagnostic result of their Sasang constitutions, and analyzed by crosstabs to get the rate of accuracy of the the QSCCⅡ+, and the kappa value for the measure of agreements. 3. Results and Conclusions The expected rate to get the same results was 54.5% in Soyangin, 68.1% in Taeumin, 65.7% in Soeumin, and kappa value was 0.311~0.414, which means the reliability of the QSCCⅡ+ is analytically significant. The accuracy of the results of QSCCⅡ+, compared to the diagnosis of the SCM specialists, was 58.4%, but increased up to 60.8%, and validity also became moderately good(K=0.412) by age limitation. Because in the 70's results of the QSCCⅡ+ isn't likely to agree to the diagnosis of the SCM specialists.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. "개정된 사상체질분류검사Ⅱ의 타당화 연구" (2003), 경희대학교 대학원
  2. "개정된 사상체질별분류검사지Ⅱ에 대한 임상적 고찰", 13(3), pp.15~22 (2001)
  3. "의학보건학 통계분석" (2000), 고려정보산업
  4. "평생 건강 관리 프로그램의 건강 위험 평가 설문지의 신뢰도에 관한 조사", 13(4), pp.354~363 (1992)
  5. "Statistical Methods for rates and proportions", pp.212~235 (1981)
  6. "설문지에 의한 연구방법", 15(1), pp.30~38 (1994)
  7. "가정의학회지에 게재된 논문 중 설문지와 관련된 논문 분석", 17(9), pp.748~760 (1996)
  8. "알기 쉬운 사상의학", pp.48~65 (1996), 사상사
  9. "사상체질분류검사(QSCC)의 타당화연구", 5(1), pp.61~80 (1993)
  10. "사상체질 분류 검사지(QSCCⅡ)의 표준화 연구", 8(1), pp.187~246 (1996)
  11. "사상체질 분류 검사지(QSCCⅡ)의 타당화 연구", 8(1), pp.247~294 (1996)
  12. "사상체질분류검사지(QSCC)Ⅱ에 의한 소음인 진단의 타당성 연구", pp.94~103 (2000)
  13. "사상체질분류검사지Ⅱ에 의한 소음인 진단의 타당성 연구" (2001), 경희대학교 대학원
  14. "사상체질분류검사지(QSCCⅡ)에 의한 태음인 진단의 타당성 연구", 13(1), pp.45~50 (2001)
  15. "사상체질분류검사지(QSCC II)의 Upgrade 연구 (I).", pp.27~38 (2003)
  16. "사상체질분류검사지(QSCC II)의 Upgrade 연구 (II).", pp.39~49 (2003)
  17. "신경행동학적 증상 설문지의 타당도 및 신뢰도에 관한 연구", 7(1), pp.21~27 (1995)
  18. "연구방법론 특강통계" (2003), 고려의학
  19. "연구방법론 특강통계" (2003), 고려의학

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)