체질의학 임상연구자의 피험자 동의서 취득에 대한 인식도 조사
Attitude and awareness of Sasang Constitution Investigators on the Informed Consent
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
1. Objectives We surveyed the attitude and awareness of Sasang Constitution investigators on informed consent in clinical study. This study was performed in order to improve the quality of ethical aspects in clinical study by surveying the process of obtaining informed consent. 2. Methods We sent the questionnaire by email to Sasang Constitution investigators who had the experience in clinical study. The question was about the necessity of informed consent and the process of obtaining it. 3. Results Twenty-two out of 24 questionnaires were collected. All of investigators recognized that informed consent is needed for clinical study. Sixty-four percent of the respondents ‘fully’ or ‘mostly’ explained the informed consent but they added only 41% of participants ‘fully’ or ‘mostly’ understood. Fifty-four point five percent of respondents provided participants enough time and opportunity to inquire the study in details to decide whether or not to participate in the study, the rest of respondents obtained informed consent without providing enough time for decision. 4. Conclusions Sasang Constitution investigators had high awareness of necessity for informed consent in clinical study. But participants’ understanding was low despite of the degree of investigators’ explanation. A various strategies should be designed for improving consent forms and process. Most of all, investigators should make sure that informed consent intends to protect participants and promote ethical research conduct.
Abstract
1. Objectives We surveyed the attitude and awareness of Sasang Constitution investigators on informed consent in clinical study. This study was performed in order to improve the quality of ethical aspects in clinical study by surveying the process of obtaining informed consent. 2. Methods We sent the questionnaire by email to Sasang Constitution investigators who had the experience in clinical study. The question was about the necessity of informed consent and the process of obtaining it. 3. Results Twenty-two out of 24 questionnaires were collected. All of investigators recognized that informed consent is needed for clinical study. Sixty-four percent of the respondents ‘fully’ or ‘mostly’ explained the informed consent but they added only 41% of participants ‘fully’ or ‘mostly’ understood. Fifty-four point five percent of respondents provided participants enough time and opportunity to inquire the study in details to decide whether or not to participate in the study, the rest of respondents obtained informed consent without providing enough time for decision. 4. Conclusions Sasang Constitution investigators had high awareness of necessity for informed consent in clinical study. But participants’ understanding was low despite of the degree of investigators’ explanation. A various strategies should be designed for improving consent forms and process. Most of all, investigators should make sure that informed consent intends to protect participants and promote ethical research conduct.
참고문헌 (24)
- Sakett DL, "Evidence-based medicine London", Haricourt
- Buetow S, "Evidence-based medicine the need for a new definition", J Eval Clin Pract, 6, pp.85~92 (2000)
- "임상시험정책방향" (2011), 식품의약품안전청[URL]
- The Nuremberg Code, "Nuremberg Military Tribunal", ~ (1947)
- "Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects" (2000)[URL]
- "The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behaviral Research April 18, 1979"[URL]
- ICH-GCP, "Guidelines for Goodl Clinical Practice for Trials on Pharmaceutical Products" (1995), World Health Organization
- Emanuel E, "What makes Clinical Research Ethical", JAMA, 283(20), pp.2701~2711 (2000)
- Kim OJ, "Bioethics and Protection of Personal Information in Observational Studies", Korea Jounal of Epidemiology, 28(2), pp.129~137 (2006)
- Kim OJ, "Bioethics and Protection of Personal Information in Experimental Studies", Korea Jounal of Epidemiology, 29(1), pp.1~12 (2007)
- "약사법 시행규칙 별표 3의 2. 의약품 임상시험 관리기준(제32조 관련)", ~ (2011)
- 심명진, "임상연구 동의 과정의 새로운 분류와 각 단계별 개선방안", 임상약리학회지, 17(1), pp.5~26 (2009), 대한임상약리학회
- 김세원, "항암화학치료시 사전동의서 취득에 관한 의사의 인식도와 행위 조사", 대한내과학회지, 78(5), pp.610~615 (2010), 대한내과학회
- 이성희, "의약품 임상시험 및 피험자 동의서에 대한 인식도", 임상약리학회지, 17(1), pp.72~92 (2009), 대한임상약리학회
- Moon HL, "A survey of the Cognition on Clinical Trial and Informed Consent of Cancer patients and Their families", Pharmacol Ther, 3(2), pp.141~150 (1995)
- 신희영, "피험자 동의의 개선방안", 임상약리학회지, 16(1), pp.13~20 (2008), 대한임상약리학회
- 정인숙, "임상연구에서 피험자 서면동의의 질 평가", 한국의료윤리학회지, 13(1), pp.43~58 (2010), 한국의료윤리학회
- 이시우, "사상체질 임상 연구 현황에 대한 조사연구 -사상체질의학회지를 중심으로-", 사상체질의학회지, 20(2), pp.21~29 (2008), 사상체질의학회
- Michael K, "Readability standards for informed consent forms as compared with actual readability", New England Journal of Medicine, 348(8), pp.721~726 (2003)
- Mosely TH, "Effect of presentation method on the understanding of informed consent", Br J Ophthalmol, 90, pp.990~993 (2006)
- Robert Mudur, "Institutional Review Board: management and function", pp.282~286 (2002)
- Jefford M, "Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents", Lancet oncology, 9, pp.485~493 (2008)
- 맹광호, "공중보건 활동에서의 '사전 동의' 문제 -유네스코<생명윤리 및 인권에 관한 선언>을 중심으로-", 예방의학회지, 41(5), pp.339~344 (2008), 대한예방의학회
- 이덕환, "의료행위와 법", pp.25~32 (1998), 서울: 문영사