구약성서의 문서적 기원
Documental Origin of the Old Testament
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구의 목적은 '하나님 말씀'의 문서적 기원을 탐구하는 데 있다. 먼저 종래의 경향인 근동 전통의 수용과정을 살펴보았고, 나아가 예레미야의 예언 논쟁과 여기에서 파생되는 계시의 문서화의 필요성을 살펴보았고, 그리고 계속되는 역사과정에서의 하나님 계시의 기록 필요성과 '기록문화'의 형성과정도 살펴보았다.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the documental origin of the ‘Word of God.’ Even though the topic of this study has been considered as an issue concluded in the Old Testament study, it was raised anew due to the new information providing that most of the Old Testament scriptures were only established since the exilic period. Regarding the documental origin of the ‘Word of God,’ this study discusses that the Old Testament accepted a certain part of the traditions of the Near East and Canaan in accordance with the traditional trends. Then it explores the documental origin from a fundamentally different tradition, that is, a prophetic tradition. Jeremiah’s prophecies had a mainly negative tone, stating “one shall serve the Babylonians.” Therefore, he faced a great amount of political opposition, and there arose the debate of ‘True or False Prophecy’ in the process (cf. Jer 27-28). Such a debate of ‘True or False Prophecy’ also lasted in the exilic period. On the other hand, because the prophecy of Jeremiah was proven true by the historical events in the exilic period, the criterion of the true prophecy was established as a historical fulfillment of prophecy (Deut 18:9-22; Jer 28:8-9). The criterion required a certain time of waiting until the words of the prophet would be fulfilled, and also documental records as evidence for future reference (cf. Jer 29:4-7; 32:1-15). These processes gave birth to the course of the documental establishment of God’s revelations. The course of documental establishment of God’s revelations proceeded in quite diverse ways. One of them was the re-surfaced necessity to record the revelations of God, as the wait for salvation from God should always be fulfilled historically. This religious movement finally resulted in a ‘recording culture’ which documents the revelations of God (cf. Hab 2:2, Isa 30:8). This recording culture, along with the theology(s) facilitating the documentation of God’s Word, has actively expanded the Old Testament, and, as a result, it finally formed today’s Old Testament. In order to clarify the process of the documental formation of the Old Testament further, we need to study the contents of the theology continually, which facilitated the documentation of the Word of God that developed in a diverse fashion in the Pentateuch, historical books, and prophetic books.
참고문헌 (23)
- 레빈, "새 계약의 약속" (2006), 한우리
- 레빈, "구약성서" (2006), 한우리
- 브라이트, 존, "이스라엘 역사" (1988), 크리스챤 다이제스트
- 슈미트, H.-Ch., "구약성서 어떻게 공부할 것인가?" (2014), 대한기독교서회
- 알베르츠, 라이너, "이스라엘 종교사 I" (2003), 크리스찬 다이제스트
- 이종근, "함무라비 법의 종교성", 구약논단, 16(4), pp.157~187 (2010), 한국구약학회
- 최종원, "소위 “불평” 이야기의 문맥 안에 있는 예언자적 현상에 관한 연구: 민수기 11장에 나타난 역사적인 상황화를 중심으로", 구약논단, 22(3), pp.105~136 (2016), 한국구약학회
- 포오르, "이스라엘 역사" (1986), 성광문화사
- 포오르, "구약성서개론(상)" (1985), 성광문화사
- 한동구, "사울과 다윗의 갈등 -왕의 권력이 해체 과정에서 체험한 성스러움(삼상 19:18-24)", 한국기독교신학논총, (82), pp.49~73 (2012), 한국기독교학회
- 헤르만, "이스라엘 역사" (1989), 나단출판사
- Brueggmann, W., "I Samuel 1: A Sence of a Beginning", ZAW, 102, pp.33~48 (1990)
- Coats, G. W., "Rebellion in the Wilderniss" (1968), Abingdon Press
- Greßmann, H., "Mose und seine Zeit" (1913), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
- Kratz, R. G., "Die Komposition der erzählenden Bücher des Alten Testaments. Grundwissen der Bibelkritik" (2000), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
- Noth, M., "Überlieferungsgeschichtlichen Studien, I" (1943)
- Rendtorff, R., "Kanon und Theologie. Vorarbeiten zu einer Theologie des Alten Testaments", pp.132~140 (1991), Neukirchener Verlag
- Rendtorff, R., "Das Alte Testament. Eine Einführung" (1995), Neukirchener Verlag
- Rudolph, W., "Der Elohist als Erzähler ein Irrweg der Pentateuchkritik?" (1933), Verlag von Alfred
- Rudolph, W., "Jeremia" (1968), J. C. B. Mohr <Paul Siebeck>
- Schmitt, Hans-Christoph, "Theologie in Prophetie und Pentateuch: gesammelte Schriften", pp.3~18 (2001), Walter de Gruyter
- Seebass, H., "Numeri XI, XII und die Hypothese des Jahwist", VT, 28, pp.214~223 (1978)
- Wolff, H. W., "Das Kerygma des deuteronomischen Geschichtswerks", ZAW, 73, pp.171~186 (1961)
